In seriousness I've seen him rated as a pick in the 50-60s range, similar to where Jack went.He's been hyped on this board for years but just isn't good enough to warrant a selection. The fact is the only reason people are interested is his surname. I'll be frustrated if we use anything more than a rookie pick on him.
He definitely has scope for development but there is also a conflict of interest. We have the luxury of waiting on draft night to see if a bid comes so I'm not concerned about overpaying, I think the right decision will be made. Happy to have him taken as a rookie and to be proven wrong but having watched a bit of him and told by people in the know that he probably hasn't got 'it', I'm certainly not hanging my hopes on him. Apologies if I come off a bit rude about this!In seriousness I've seen him rated as a pick in the 50-60s range, similar to where Jack went.
KM seems to be sure that he deserves a draft spot in about that range. Rates his contested marking in particular