Disagree. Most analysts in the NBA recognise Embiid's ridiculous upside. What will make Embiid marketable is that to go along with the dominant game, he has the extreme personality off the court. Same kinda deal as Shaq.Agree that embiid is an absolute monster but imo (unless there is an obvious gulf between them) simmons will always be regarded as the better player because his game is "sexier"
It's between 8-16 feet or something like that. He's taken over 30. Granted a lot would be the hook shot/floaters he's making, but if he gets that down consistently, it's as much a money shot as a mid range jumper as it is not defendable.I'm not sure where you're pulling that number from on his mid-range and what you're defining as mid-range. He would have taken a handful of shots from 10-16 feet. That's not even a sample at all.
I definitely incorporate players' durability when I assess their worth. That is why I have Simmons over Embiid. There has never been a time in Embiid's career where he hasn't had constant injury red flags. With that said, Embiid definitely has more importance to Philly's overall team structure considering they have no real quality cover at center if he goes down, and have seemingly given up on Okafor. Their defense suffers greatly with him gone, and they return to lottery dwellars with potential if he injures himself again. That's an aside to discussing simmons though.
Fair enough on Embiid. But he's playing now, just like Simmons is after a year with injury, so I would personally assess them as they are and Simmons being the best prospect by the length of the straight is a bit much. Embiid hasn't had any issues with his foot for a while. The back issues in college were probably because of the guy growing, he's grown a legit 2 inches since he was drafted, and is 7'2. It's a concern, we'll see how much.