H
I'd be more comfortable with Howard and I'm almost sure he'll play.
well he had better find some form quickly. Hopefully he has a better day in our next game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
H
I'd be more comfortable with Howard and I'm almost sure he'll play.
Hard to argue with that team . Interesting with Brown , according to Champion Data , last season he recorded the third most spoils per game of any player in the AFL . He also conceded just 17 goals across his 14 match ups that exceeded 40 minutes , 4 of which came in one game against Franklin . in one on one contests he lost only 16% of the 62 contests he defended , the second best percentage of the top 50 contest defenders. So yes we have recruited Howard but we shouldnt dismiss Brown out of our team too quickly . i just think that as we are playing against North they may go with Brown against Brown first up but i could be wrong lol.BT66, Brown was shown where he stood when they took so long before re-signing him - he most probably fitter than anytime in his career and he is as you say one of the best defensive players around , but I feel they are going to try and use Howard in his place.
Long is another who if he performs strongly in these practice games could well play on the halfback flank and if he does where does Hunter Clark , Coffield play because they most probably go with Geary , Howard , Wilkie , Long , Carlisle , Roberton or Webster.
The thing that will be good to see is if Brown , Austin and Clavarino get a run in the preseason.
A guy like Savage could well be playing in the 2s because we can't fit him into the team , the same with Sinclair because how can you fit him in the team with all the players we have.
Ok position wise I don't have a clue where they will play but I feel this will be around our best 22 - I'm picking Roberton because they must have confidence in him in giving him a leadership role.
Geary - Howard - Wilkie
Hunter Clark - Carlisle - Roberton or Webster
Jones - Hannebery - Hill
Billings - Membery - Battle
Lonie - King - Butler
Marshall / Ross / Gresham
Ryder - Dunstan - Steele - XXXX
Guys like Sinclair , Savage , Paton , Long , Marsh , Kent and Bytel will all be looking for a run - King may well be given time in the 2s , or we get a few injuries , but whatever happens we now have strength on our bench.
So Marley Williams is out for round one.
Also quite a few best 22 players missing on the weekend for North.
Are all these guys expected to be back before round one?
Brown, Ziebell, Polec, Tarrant are all currently injured and Higgins might be as well. Didn't play on the weekend.Which players?
So Marley Williams is out for round one.
Also quite a few best 22 players missing on the weekend for North.
Are all these guys expected to be back before round one?
Seems like they might be a bit underdone for match fitness round one though.Brown, Tarrant, Polec, Ziebell & LDU should all be right for Round 1.
Not sure Polec will be much chop but others should be fine.
Stats wise, interestingly we’ve only won 1 of our last 10 Round 1 games.
Thanks for the info mate.Brown, Tarrant, Polec, Ziebell & LDU should all be right for Round 1.
Not sure Polec will be much chop but others should be fine.
Stats wise, interestingly we’ve only won 1 of our last 10 Round 1 games.
Brown, Tarrant, Polec, Ziebell & LDU should all be right for Round 1.
Not sure Polec will be much chop but others should be fine.
Stats wise, interestingly we’ve only won 1 of our last 10 Round 1 games.
That was a North supporter saying North has only won 1 of their last 10 rd1 games.Lies
Brissie 2018
Gold Coast 2019
We’ve won our last 2 R1 games.
He is a north supporterLies
Brissie 2018
Gold Coast 2019
We’ve won our last 2 R1 games.
Thanks for the info mate.
Where is Polec up to? Is he back running yet?
That was a North supporter saying North has only won 1 of their last 10 rd1 games.
BT any word if Bytel will get a run on Friday against Hawthorn.Hard to argue with that team . Interesting with Brown , according to Champion Data , last season he recorded the third most spoils per game of any player in the AFL . He also conceded just 17 goals across his 14 match ups that exceeded 40 minutes , 4 of which came in one game against Franklin . in one on one contests he lost only 16% of the 62 contests he defended , the second best percentage of the top 50 contest defenders. So yes we have recruited Howard but we shouldnt dismiss Brown out of our team too quickly . i just think that as we are playing against North they may go with Brown against Brown first up but i could be wrong lol.
I'm not great at percentages. We may have to call plugger66 in for this equation...Back to battle debate....potentially need some education....
if we’re set on 3 talls back and forward along with a ruck and each tall plays 85-90% do we not need a 7th tall in battle to replace the 7*10-15%?
Appreciate that we may still have an additional tall to the oppos who may use a tall mid/hb to plug the tall rotations but simplistically at least the time on field for a swinging tall is there isn’t it?
It's simple. Just take out 7 oranges, a protractor and a knife.I'm not great at percentages. We may have to call plugger66 in for this equation...
View attachment 828964
I thought the exact same thing the other day. He can cover 10 mins up forward and 10 mins down back per quarter, with occasionally rotations on a wing. If they organise their rotations right it could work.Back to battle debate....potentially need some education....
if we’re set on 3 talls back and forward along with a ruck and each tall plays 85-90% do we not need a 7th tall in battle to replace the 7*10-15%?
Appreciate that we may still have an additional tall to the oppos who may use a tall mid/hb to plug the tall rotations but simplistically at least the time on field for a swinging tall is there isn’t it?
I think it’s pretty obvious. 70% of people like dimmies 39% don’t. Am I on track?I'm not great at percentages. We may have to call plugger66 in for this equation...
View attachment 828964
See there in a nutshell is why you have the Blake Acres role. People hate it but there is a need for a tall(ish) swingman in the team.Back to battle debate....potentially need some education....
if we’re set on 3 talls back and forward along with a ruck and each tall plays 85-90% do we not need a 7th tall in battle to replace the 7*10-15%?
Appreciate that we may still have an additional tall to the oppos who may use a tall mid/hb to plug the tall rotations but simplistically at least the time on field for a swinging tall is there isn’t it?
What if he’s spudding it up for the other 85-90% of the game? Don’t think that’s worth the 2-3 minutes a quarter to cover a tall on the bench.Back to battle debate....potentially need some education....
if we’re set on 3 talls back and forward along with a ruck and each tall plays 85-90% do we not need a 7th tall in battle to replace the 7*10-15%?
Appreciate that we may still have an additional tall to the oppos who may use a tall mid/hb to plug the tall rotations but simplistically at least the time on field for a swinging tall is there isn’t it?