Best Available 22

[King_snow]

Now that we are on the bye i think its time to rethink the team. ideas would be the 3 rucks is it working? Vez a forward or back? and other things like this so please through some ideas around.

 

[Fossie 32]

Don't like the three rucks tactic - I imagine it didn't help last week, can't remember what happened previously ....... unless they happened to be 3 Brownlow candidates

 

[King_snow]

Don't like the three rucks tactic - I imagine it didn't help last week, can't remember what happened previously ....... unless they happened to be 3 Brownlow candidates

Yeah i don't think the 3 rucks work. thats the thing about cordy though cuz he doesn't really ruck but can when need be and plays a FF role well. Roughy can a little but Minson can't forward. so id take Roughy out

 

[King_snow]

Id put Moles in our 22

 

[adam10]

Wood Lake Addison
Vez Markovic Murphy
Sherman/DJ Boyd Wallis
Dalhaus Jones Cooney
Dickson Cordy Higgins

Minson Griffen Picken

Libba, Howard, Tutt, Panos

 

[King_snow]

Wood Lake Addison
Vez Markovic Murphy
Sherman/DJ Boyd Wallis
Dalhaus Jones Cooney
Dickson Cordy Higgins

Minson Griffen Picken

Libba, Howard, Tutt, Panos

I wouldn't have Sherman. and the whole Marko vs Aussie is so hard to pick

 

[Igloo]

Sherman is definitely in our 22, imo. He had a down couple of weeks before being dropped, but his pace and good goal sense is important for us I think.

 

[King_snow]

Sherman is definitely in our 22, imo. He had a down couple of weeks before being dropped, but his pace and good goal sense is important for us I think.

I would have Moles over Sherman, they are very similar but Moles in form is better than an in form Sherman

 

[Igloo]

I would have Moles over Sherman, they are very similar but Moles in form is better than an in form Sherman

I disagree. I'm a big fan of Moles, but Sherman's best is better. I've seen every game Moles has played at AFL level, and not all of Sherman's, and I can comfortably say I have seen Sherman play much better than Moles' best.

 

[Lex22]

I would have Moles over Sherman, they are very similar but Moles in form is better than an in form Sherman

Moles is slow, Sherman is fast. It's a fair difference!

 

[King_snow]

Moles is slow, Sherman is fast. It's a fair difference!

Moles is pretty quick

 

[King_snow]

I disagree. I'm a big fan of Moles, but Sherman's best is better. I've seen every game Moles has played at AFL level, and not all of Sherman's, and I can comfortably say I have seen Sherman play much better than Moles' best.

Moles hasn't even given proper chances

 

[King_snow]

In your best available 22 would you guys have the 3 rucks?

 

[Shoota]

If jones is serviceable enough, then Cordy and Roughy isn't needed. IMO I see Brendan trying to get as much game time into all 3 mentioned based on form and injuries. It's hard to make a selection call, as all 3 at times have shown glimpses of great play, strong pack marks to follow up with a behind. A high percentage at times this has happened. I may be harsh but Jones and Grant just don't look and feel to me to be the players I so want them to be for our club.
Still I would still play them:
Jones Grant Cordy and Roughy as sub
Sherman in has the ability to get us goals and run he has pace

addison lake wood
hargrave aussie muph
wallis libba picken
sherman jones lukey
gia cordy cooney
minson boyd griffen
cross/higgins/grant/roughy

 

[_Mike_]

In your best available 22 would you guys have the 3 rucks?

No. We're too top heavy with not enough leg speed. We were caught out badly last Sunday as a result. 2 seems the limit these days although it's not rare to see teams go with 1 for a game