exe ex machina
Kylo was here
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2005
- Posts
- 153,625
- Reaction score
- 104,505
- Location
- San Marino
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
- Other Teams
- Dan Marino
Re: BigFooty Fantasy Football League
Next year, perhaps a tweaking of the rules around squad list, amount of starters required, how many rounds of drafting there are, and therefore more room for trade deals, future trade deals.
As is, there's a mandatory 9 required for starting, and maximum 6 bench, but the make up of that squad could be 6 WRs, or 6 RBs. Someone therefore would end up without a TE.
Maybe, if there's a mandatory minimum squad of 14 players, consisting of minimum 2 qb, 3 rb, 3 wr, 2 te, 2 dst, 2 k....that actually is your starting team and your reserves all there. starters is just 1 qb, 2 rb, 2 wr, 1 te, 1 dst, 1 k.
8 starters 6 bench minimum mandatory. But....there are actually perhaps 20 rounds of drafting, especially if we include an expansion team or two. In those extra draft rounds, people can draft more than the mandatory minimum or stay on the mandatory minimum.
In the end...I might have 20 players selected, while someone else only 15, because they either traded away 2 picks for 1, or they elected to release some in the FA period.
In the end...each person has a mandatory minimum of 14, 8 starters, 6 bench, but can have theoritically 20 or even 24 players on his list if he so chooses to draft all the way thru and/or accept trade deals where people trade him a spot for 3 of theirs.
It also ensures that every team has to have a minimum 2 TEs, DST and K, because if one gets injured or whatever, then they're not left without a TE, DST or K. Currently tho, for instance, i dont have to have 2 DST, or 2 TE.
Next year, perhaps a tweaking of the rules around squad list, amount of starters required, how many rounds of drafting there are, and therefore more room for trade deals, future trade deals.
As is, there's a mandatory 9 required for starting, and maximum 6 bench, but the make up of that squad could be 6 WRs, or 6 RBs. Someone therefore would end up without a TE.
Maybe, if there's a mandatory minimum squad of 14 players, consisting of minimum 2 qb, 3 rb, 3 wr, 2 te, 2 dst, 2 k....that actually is your starting team and your reserves all there. starters is just 1 qb, 2 rb, 2 wr, 1 te, 1 dst, 1 k.
8 starters 6 bench minimum mandatory. But....there are actually perhaps 20 rounds of drafting, especially if we include an expansion team or two. In those extra draft rounds, people can draft more than the mandatory minimum or stay on the mandatory minimum.
In the end...I might have 20 players selected, while someone else only 15, because they either traded away 2 picks for 1, or they elected to release some in the FA period.
In the end...each person has a mandatory minimum of 14, 8 starters, 6 bench, but can have theoritically 20 or even 24 players on his list if he so chooses to draft all the way thru and/or accept trade deals where people trade him a spot for 3 of theirs.
It also ensures that every team has to have a minimum 2 TEs, DST and K, because if one gets injured or whatever, then they're not left without a TE, DST or K. Currently tho, for instance, i dont have to have 2 DST, or 2 TE.
as i said earlier, no one should be made to have 2 K or 2 DST or 2 TE, thats just plain stupid in my opinion, we are leaving it at a squad of 16 with the 9 starting spots, i dont see the need to stuff around with it
