Remove this Banner Ad

Big changes to SuperCoach in 2013

  • Thread starter Thread starter timster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The captaincy hole is now a lot bigger. No double points for captains would be better IMO.

Crazy Call - would just be better if they eliminated the loophole, thats why we have a vice captain, plain and simple really
 
Crazy Call - would just be better if they eliminated the loophole, thats why we have a vice captain, plain and simple really
Yeah but how would the Hun get all those extra clicks? Supercoach this year is all about the HUN maximising profit. Extra clicks via extra trades, extra clicks by leaving the loopholes open.

First prize? Still the same measly $50k the offered first time 6 yrs ago.

Money grubbing bastards.

I'll still play of course.:p
 
Yeah but how would the Hun get all those extra clicks? Supercoach this year is all about the HUN maximising profit. Extra clicks via extra trades, extra clicks by leaving the loopholes open.

First prize? Still the same measly $50k the offered first time 6 yrs ago.

Money grubbing bastards.

I'll still play of course.:p

Heaps of extra clicks by the rolling lockout.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Yeah but how would the Hun get all those extra clicks? Supercoach this year is all about the HUN maximising profit. Extra clicks via extra trades, extra clicks by leaving the loopholes open.

First prize? Still the same measly $50k the offered first time 6 yrs ago.

Money grubbing bastards.

I'll still play of course.:p
Yeah, the HUN should give us more prizemoney and try to get less people clicking their online interests and run at a loss. :p
 
Yeah, the HUN should give us more prizemoney and try to get less people clicking their online interests and run at a loss. :p
Well considering how the participation numbers have gone through the roof since the first & the money they now collect from SC Gold, I don't think it's unreasonable to up the Prize money or at least maybe some money for second & third.

Where the heck did I say the should get LESS clicks. This year the clicks are going to go through the roof though. All those social players who burn their trades will be clicking later in the year. The Cap loophole, the emg loophole, the extra trades in general. People who can afford the time will be on all weekend (with advantages over others who can't).

If they are running SC at a loss for the last 6yrs then someone needs to be held accountable.

It won't help their other online business, as it's a separate cost to go behind the news paywall if that's what you're suggesting.
 
Well considering how the participation numbers have gone through the roof since the first & the money they now collect from SC Gold, I don't think it's unreasonable to up the Prize money or at least maybe some money for second & third.
Agree with this
Where the heck did I say the should get LESS clicks. I was being a little bit facetious here - you're calling them money hungry for wanting more people to visit their website (it's implied in your text)This year the clicks are going to go through the roof though. All those social players who burn their trades will be clicking later in the year. The Cap loophole, the emg loophole, the extra trades in general. People who can afford the time will be on all weekend (with advantages over others who can't). People are over-reacting to this, not even the biggest social ****** in the world has all weekend to follow rolling lockouts and the same hopeless people who burn trades early will just burn even more trades early - this game is brilliantly designed to tap in to the most basic human psychological conditioning processes.

If they are running SC at a loss for the last 6yrs then someone needs to be held accountable.
Not sure about this, maybe you know something I don't.
It won't help their other online business, as it's a separate cost to go behind the news paywall if that's what you're suggesting.
They get money from the ads on the SC website, not just the paywall.
 
46 trades is a disgrace, I might just start with all rookies now.


Wrecked the game.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

44 trades and no lock out is only for DT NOT supercoach, another reason why SC a better game than DT. I wonder how many people will be crossing over to SC as a result.
 
Most decent supercoach players start with similar looking sides. Trading is what separated the good from the elite players. More trades lessens that advantage.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Well considering how the participation numbers have gone through the roof since the first & the money they now collect from SC Gold, I don't think it's unreasonable to up the Prize money or at least maybe some money for second & third.

Where the heck did I say the should get LESS clicks. This year the clicks are going to go through the roof though. All those social players who burn their trades will be clicking later in the year. The Cap loophole, the emg loophole, the extra trades in general. People who can afford the time will be on all weekend (with advantages over others who can't).

If they are running SC at a loss for the last 6yrs then someone needs to be held accountable.

It won't help their other online business, as it's a separate cost to go behind the news paywall if that's what you're suggesting.

WTF, how does that one work?????????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom