- Joined
- Apr 20, 2001
- Posts
- 28,335
- Reaction score
- 11,347
- Location
- Adelaide Oval / Anfield
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Utd,Liverpool, WWT Eagles.
The captaincy hole is now a lot bigger. No double points for captains would be better IMO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

The captaincy hole is now a lot bigger. No double points for captains would be better IMO.
Yeah but how would the Hun get all those extra clicks? Supercoach this year is all about the HUN maximising profit. Extra clicks via extra trades, extra clicks by leaving the loopholes open.Crazy Call - would just be better if they eliminated the loophole, thats why we have a vice captain, plain and simple really

Yeah but how would the Hun get all those extra clicks? Supercoach this year is all about the HUN maximising profit. Extra clicks via extra trades, extra clicks by leaving the loopholes open.
First prize? Still the same measly $50k the offered first time 6 yrs ago.
Money grubbing bastards.
I'll still play of course.![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yes, that's what I said.Heaps of extra clicks by the rolling lockout.
Heaps of extra clicks by the rolling lockout.

Yeah, the HUN should give us more prizemoney and try to get less people clicking their online interests and run at a loss.Yeah but how would the Hun get all those extra clicks? Supercoach this year is all about the HUN maximising profit. Extra clicks via extra trades, extra clicks by leaving the loopholes open.
First prize? Still the same measly $50k the offered first time 6 yrs ago.
Money grubbing bastards.
I'll still play of course.![]()

Well considering how the participation numbers have gone through the roof since the first & the money they now collect from SC Gold, I don't think it's unreasonable to up the Prize money or at least maybe some money for second & third.Yeah, the HUN should give us more prizemoney and try to get less people clicking their online interests and run at a loss.![]()
Well considering how the participation numbers have gone through the roof since the first & the money they now collect from SC Gold, I don't think it's unreasonable to up the Prize money or at least maybe some money for second & third.
Agree with this
Where the heck did I say the should get LESS clicks. I was being a little bit facetious here - you're calling them money hungry for wanting more people to visit their website (it's implied in your text)This year the clicks are going to go through the roof though. All those social players who burn their trades will be clicking later in the year. The Cap loophole, the emg loophole, the extra trades in general. People who can afford the time will be on all weekend (with advantages over others who can't). People are over-reacting to this, not even the biggest social ****** in the world has all weekend to follow rolling lockouts and the same hopeless people who burn trades early will just burn even more trades early - this game is brilliantly designed to tap in to the most basic human psychological conditioning processes.
If they are running SC at a loss for the last 6yrs then someone needs to be held accountable.
Not sure about this, maybe you know something I don't.
It won't help their other online business, as it's a separate cost to go behind the news paywall if that's what you're suggesting.
They get money from the ads on the SC website, not just the paywall.
46 trades next year?



I always was one step ahead of the pack.Don't laugh DT or 'AFL Fantasy' as it's now known is moving to 46 this year![]()
Last years winner traded out gazza rd3 then bought him back in about rd 7/8.....It's frustrating because some nuffie who trades Ablett to Stanton in round 1 can easily swap them back without really feeling any effect.
For those complaining about the extra trades killing the advantage for the strategists, you have to remember the game is geared for the social player (who I imagine makes up the bulk of the competition).All those social players
Well considering how the participation numbers have gone through the roof since the first & the money they now collect from SC Gold, I don't think it's unreasonable to up the Prize money or at least maybe some money for second & third.
Where the heck did I say the should get LESS clicks. This year the clicks are going to go through the roof though. All those social players who burn their trades will be clicking later in the year. The Cap loophole, the emg loophole, the extra trades in general. People who can afford the time will be on all weekend (with advantages over others who can't).
If they are running SC at a loss for the last 6yrs then someone needs to be held accountable.
It won't help their other online business, as it's a separate cost to go behind the news paywall if that's what you're suggesting.