- May 15, 2013
- 13,781
- 16,814
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Ok guys, lets get this started.
We need a team name
We need a team name
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Ok guys, lets get this started.
We need a team name
I nominate the Saint Kilda Football Club.Lets pick a charity, so if any money is won it goes to that.
dont you mean the Essendon Football ClubI nominate the Saint Kilda Football Club.
No I want Essendon to leave this planet for good.dont you mean the Essendon Football Club
It's not a league, though. It's a team.Needs to start with "BF SC" - that's the rule on community leagues.
BF SC Campaigners sounds good
Not Lids.Shaw
Danger
Goldy
Lids
Locked imo
+1Not Lids.
An option? Maybe. But definitely not a lock.
LockFyfe and Danger for mid premos IMO
Shaw and Goldy also
Barlow as well
348k on the bench? i suppose we could, but what do we sacrifice?Lycett needs to be locked in at R3.
Cull Ablett, Goldy, Shaw, Fyfe etc.348k on the bench? i suppose we could, but what do we sacrifice?
Or, you know, just spend 123k on Grimley.Lycett needs to be locked in at R3.
how aboutWe need to figure out some way to get a structure somehow. Otherwise it's just gonna be different people calling different players locks and we will have 45 locks
so maybe, as toxic said, load up in the mids, leaving the other lines a bit weak - which means we have to pick some break out contendersWhile I understand the 'group think' Team of the Century idea, wouldn't it be more interesting if we take a couple of big risks? Maybe even one on each line? Like trying to pick a couple of break-out premo's, or giving a more radical structure a go. You know, the things we don't have the balls to do with our own precious teams.
It would certainly interest me a little more to do something different
While I understand the 'group think' Team of the Century idea, wouldn't it be more interesting if we take a couple of big risks? Maybe even one on each line? Like trying to pick a couple of break-out premo's, or giving a more radical structure a go. You know, the things we don't have the balls to do with our own precious teams.
It would certainly interest me a little more to do something different