It has to stay how it is. If teams drafted badly, then they need to trade to make up for their mistake. If it costs them a few good players, that is the cost.
I don't understand what the problem is - but maybe I am a bit simple..
What about those of us that never got to draft at all?

I reckon I could've killed the draft if I was involved (though I'm sure everyone else says that).
Another point - I'd love to have 1 ruck and extra util. That's obvious for me though as I have shithouse rucks. I also believe that fantasy footy squads should look similar to AFL squads, and I believe we've done everything right with categories and positions, however not many clubs will play 2 pure ruckmen anymore. Most will play 1 ruck, and 1 ruck/CHF type (eg, Cox, NicNat, Roughy, TV, Hale, Griffin, Tippett, Jenkins, etc).
In terms of the Witts trade, well I can see it a little one-sided but I know for a fact that Rocky has worked hard to try and get the value he has wanted out of him, so good on him. He was offered to me (I didn't bite) and I looked at him seriously. But in saying that, I'm not vetoing nor approving (just staying on the fence here).
But I'm more worried about the crazy value of ruckmen in this league than I am about the trade itself.
Same. I really wish people lowered their standards and let me have a good one
We cant change to one ruck. ....if it was an extra utility gained I would have much prefered ebert over kreuzer and pettard over Bailey.
Is there a possibilty we can have a vote? Obviously those in favour of having 2 rucks would usually have 2 good ruckmen. Those that have 1 decent ruckmen are obviously going to vote for the extra utility. It's not rocket science, but at the end of the day surely we want a more even league where shitty teams like I inherited have at least a chance?
*note: this is all coming from bias that I never had a chance to draft 2 good ruckmen and have had to pay a price since that*
We all joined this league, drafted and traded with certain parameters in effect and I don't see why those parameters should change now.
Not I.
But in saying this, I think we should do a North Melbourne and make it so 75% have to agree to Major Rule changes for it to be approved.