boncer34
Formerly "Dos23"
North not trading Goldstein while he still had currency.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
lol - you think that is as bad as Manye for 4 years on good money?? We may have got an ok pick for Goldy and may have drafted a good player??North not trading Goldstein while he still had currency.
Lulz.lol - you think that is as bad as Manye for 4 years on good money?? We may have got an ok pick for Goldy and may have drafted a good player??
Not trading Goldy is as bad as giving Stanton and Watson another contract. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
Stantons teaching the junior players how to paint fences? If Boomer is not getting another year - no way we would give Watson a year.Lulz.
Watson would be in your top 5 players and Stants is providing valuable feed back to the kids in the VFL.
Not quite as bad as being dropped for a failed project player and a kid who looked like he spent no time as a junior playing the game.
Good try though Billy boy.
What I view as particularly bad trades currently
Geelong give up: Billie Smedts, pick 63, 2017 first round pick
Carlton give up: Zach Tuohy, 2017 second round pick
Pick 63 is basically irrelevant. What is relevant is the pick downgrade that Geelong took on this year. As it stands, it will be a minimal (2-6) pick downgrade into the early second round for a player that has made their team much better. Smedts is 25 and can't crack one of the worst 22s in the comp, and when he has, he has been anonymous. As it stands, Geelong got away with robbery here, and it's not like Tuohy's form is that much of a surprise, he has been a good defender for a number of years now.
This trade eventually became: Smedts, Williamson and Marchbank
For: Touhy and 2nd rnd.
In isolation the Tuohy trade was great for Geelong, however it allowed Carlton to get a 10+ year defender with Marchbank when they traded with the giants.
On form at this stage it's jom and prestia. Still hopeful on prestia though has only been able to train one day a week in the last month
Geelong for trading a Rd 1 for 2E and their Rd2.
What were they thinking?
Currently a 4 place downgrade. Madness..... just total madness.
GO Catters
My thoughts exactly. You could say you didn't trade a top 5 pick for Mayne.Mayne is horrible but cost us nothing besides money
Omeara has produced the same as Mayne on more money and cost a first rounded and 3 second round picks.
Omeara so far is the worst
Prestia and Adams looked like identical players a few years ago. Small yet tough inside midfielders with extremely poor skills.I think Prestia will come good jom I'm not sure of but time will tell. I think for this thread to serious all the trades have to be put up with what exactly who and what went where not just pick 12 name the player.
Sydney letting Tom Mitchell go.
10 + 23?
Gold Coast got 10 (2016) + 25 (2017, currently). Hawthorn gave up 7 and 25 (2017, currently) + 23 and 36 (2016) and got 68 (2016) back. It's a lot to give up. It's a bizarre trade because St Kilda got the best deal out of anyone.
The saving grace is that Tom Mitchell is about as proven a commodity as you can get for pick 14 so at least one player from the 2016/17 drafts can be pencilled in as a success.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing, we probably thought Bowes would go earlier, thus got that 10 pick as insurance. Also needed to have the foresight that Hawks wouldn't crash and burn like they did this year. Can't fault our work last year though with Ainsworth, Brodie, Scrimshaw, Bowes and Scheer all coming in.Gold Coast for digging their heels in so much with the JOM trade. A lot of hindsight here, but if they understood the Hawks desperation and got the Saints bounty instead of that "top 10 pick".
Bowes was bid just prior to the Saints pick, so they would have walked away with the same draft haul but matched with picks 23 & 36 instead (with change for Scheer) they'd then have the Hawks future first too.
Lulz.
Watson would be in your top 5 players and Stants is providing valuable feed back to the kids in the VFL.
Not quite as bad as being dropped for a failed project player and a kid who looked like he spent no time as a junior playing the game.
Good try though Billy boy.
Someone should tell Brad Majak was shading Tom I guess.If Majak can shade Bellchambers god help what Preuss would do to him, maybe check out the VFL from time to time.
They wouldn't have been on big coin though? What is the October master plan? Fyfe and May have signed contracts
Everyone already mentioned.Thinking Prestia might not live up to all the hype,just looks like an average player.
If Majak can shade Bellchambers god help what Preuss would do to him, maybe check out the VFL from time to time.
If Majak can shade Bellchambers god help what Preuss would do to him, maybe check out the VFL from time to time.
Ruck battles are so inconsistent, TBC smashed Mumford, Grundy, Ryder since he's been back and been beaten by Martin and Naismith. Form against one match up does not dictate it against another.
I wasn't very clear TBH - I was taking the piss out of those that said GFC had ****ed up by trading a Rd 1 pick for 2E -Looks shocking in isolation, but was needed to net us a 10 year CHB (Marchbank)
I think all Freo fans would not agree with you. They held Mayne in the highest regard and shattered, to a man, when he left.The whole compensation thing is ******
The fact that Richmond and Freo got early second rounders for flogs like Ty Vickery and Chris Mayne is ludicrous