Moeydw
All Australian
With Brett Anderson saying that Collingwood are considering Richards at 6, would you say that it would be a big reach or would he be worthy of a selection at 6?
-
-
If you are seeing this notice, posts and uploads you make now may be lost when we cut over to the upgraded system. This should only last a few hours.
Post feedback, issues, errors and omissions here. Read the OP first, please.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Phantom Draft Bishop's 2017 Draft Thread
- Thread starter Bishop
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
HedgeFund
Norm Smith Medallist
Reeeeaaaccchhhh
Last edited:
Moeydw
All Australian
Thought so, could you see it happening on Friday? It would really sour my night if Hine ends up going with him.
Maybe the crazy decision to let Jake Kelly go has them too scared to let Ed slip.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Saints would be bloody fools to draft Hartung at 45. I know this draft is shallow but Hartung is an incredibly soft player that would disappear in a final and either lacks skills like toughness or refuses to use weapons like speed. He's panicky and indecisive. He's a dud and I totally get why he was delisted by the hawks. Richmond don't need outside types bu even if they did, I'd be praying they didn't draft Hartung.
Try a kid, have a crack, you may find a role player, or even better a gun player. Saints need to back their recruiters.
- Thread starter
- #2,156
Think Ballard will be gone by then, Ross I believe hasn't spoken to Saints. No idea on the other two.
I think it'd be a reach, but you've gotta back your recruiters in - they've seen more than me (or anyone else) of Richards playing.
Think things get blown out by the fact that fans watch a 2 minute highlight video and fall in love with player X, I've never seen a bad highlights package...
If Carlton are considering Richards at 10, then it certainly isn't a reach to take him at Pick 6.
CaptainMurphy
Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
Western Bulldogs - Ed Richards Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Mitch Honeychurch Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Nathan Mullenger-McHugh Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Nathan Mullenger-McHugh Player Sponsor 2017
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale Player Sponsor 2017
Western Bulldogs - Mitch Honeychurch Player Sponsor 2017
- Jun 4, 2015
- 5,715
- 7,754
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
I hope we consider him at 9
- Oct 10, 2012
- 8,395
- 16,152
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
+1000000
Please go and talk some sense to the Saints board. Sick of his name!
Dysfunctional
Team Captain
- Nov 17, 2017
- 597
- 928
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Murphy more likely at 6
dougy58
Rookie
- Jul 4, 2014
- 45
- 26
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Too true, the highlight draft experts at this time of the year come out of the woodwork. didn't know what the prospects looked like til last week
CaptainMurphy
Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
Western Bulldogs - Ed Richards Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Mitch Honeychurch Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Nathan Mullenger-McHugh Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Nathan Mullenger-McHugh Player Sponsor 2017
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale Player Sponsor 2017
Western Bulldogs - Mitch Honeychurch Player Sponsor 2017
- Jun 4, 2015
- 5,715
- 7,754
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Bishop, from what I can gather the two most likely at our pick 9 are Naughton and Murphy, is that what you're thinking? If they are both there, which do you think we'd take?
Seems like both the Collingwood and WB boards are convinced they're getting Naughton!
Dysfunctional
Team Captain
- Nov 17, 2017
- 597
- 928
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Will be one of them. I have him going to the dogs.
Dannnnnnnnnn
Moderator
- Aug 24, 2012
- 37,843
- 55,637
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- T'Wolves/Patrick Beverley/Footscray
- Moderator
- #2,164
Pls be right Collingwood board
WaynesWorld19
Post-Human
Just can't see it happening .....Shifter Sheehan said today that Richards had worked into first round consideration .....that's a long way though from #6
WaynesWorld19
Post-Human
Can't understand the talk of you guys taking a tall ......you have enough already, surely you'll be taking a Mid?
- Thread starter
- #2,168
I think Naughton is almost a lock at 9 - Pick 16 bit unsure right now as it stands.
Jonty Scharenberg's highlight video, well one of them, was really bad. He kept kicking it on the ground if front of the player he was aiming for.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
giblj
Cancelled
- Nov 15, 2014
- 2,100
- 4,910
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Neither can any of us
What about 6-8? Any certs there?
- Thread starter
- #2,172
Not at all, they're the hardest!
Dysfunctional
Team Captain
- Nov 17, 2017
- 597
- 928
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Yep agreed. They are the picks that could go any way. Except saints definitely take Coffield at one of their picks if he’s there
- Dec 22, 2006
- 10,526
- 13,038
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur
The Bradshaw at 1 continues to firm... changes so much in the first round... Freo prefer LDU over Raymor and Carlton need mids so could still take Dow or Cerra instead of Rayner who might end up at North
1. Brayshaw
2. LDU
3. Dow
4. Raynor
5. Fogarty
6. Coffield
7. Clark
8. Higgens
9. Brander
10. Stephenson
1. Brayshaw
2. LDU
3. Dow
4. Raynor
5. Fogarty
6. Coffield
7. Clark
8. Higgens
9. Brander
10. Stephenson
Last edited:
