Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Blair Hartley Project 2015

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tigerbob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Have we not learnt, never trade talls until they have had every chance to make it..
Astbury, vickers, Elton are all required....
Keep drafting kids, take some risks at the draft, unlike the safe vanilla options in the past
Recruit big bodies and big mids, recruit some speed, play more direct
6 or 7 years is long enough me thinks.:rolleyes:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

How is Schultz going?
Really well you think if he stayed he would be as good? Besides he cost the club sponsorship money as well as been a dud for us.Sometimes a good kick in the backside can bring out the best of you so it might have worked for him. Any other talls we got rid of recently that have excelled?
 
You just don't trade talls, you persist and persist and keep them in the 2's until you are sure they are duds then you delist them... How many other tall trades are doing well?
 
You just don't trade talls, you persist and persist and keep them in the 2's until you are sure they are duds then you delist them... How many other tall trades are doing well?
I can't think of many White for the woods but he isn't any better than he was a swans i think he's even worse. Daws for melb not much better than he was at woods, If you are talking about talls that moved on cause of the $ signs eg Franklin i think they don't count
 
I can't think of many White for the woods but he isn't any better than he was a swans i think he's even worse. Daws for melb not much better than he was at woods, If you are talking about talls that moved on cause of the $ signs eg Franklin i think they don't count

Agree, that's why I don't think you trade talls, any that are decent are too valuable and they just take so long to click that you need a lot of patience... An average tall today in 2 years with a better side could be the difference?
They are like pine cones, plant them and forget them and hope that one day they grow into amazing pine trees, but you need time and patience.
Look at Rance, once an absolute spud now AA, vickers has talent but is currently a spud, elton has talent as does mcbean,
 
Agree, that's why I don't think you trade talls, any that are decent are too valuable and they just take so long to click that you need a lot of patience... An average tall today in 2 years with a better side could be the difference?
They are like pine cones, plant them and forget them and hope that one day they grow into amazing pine trees, but you need time and patience.
Look at Rance, once an absolute spud now AA, vickers has talent but is currently a spud, elton has talent as does mcbean,
True that, probably that's why the coach talk now days and last couple of year's, play the f kin kids doesn't matter if we lose not that we are doing much better without them.
 
Agree, that's why I don't think you trade talls, any that are decent are too valuable and they just take so long to click that you need a lot of patience... An average tall today in 2 years with a better side could be the difference?
They are like pine cones, plant them and forget them and hope that one day they grow into amazing pine trees, but you need time and patience.
Look at Rance, once an absolute spud now AA, vickers has talent but is currently a spud, elton has talent as does mcbean,


Rance was never a spud except for some morons that could not envision his development.

It comes down to whether your recruiting prowess selects a dud or not when recruiting IMO and to a lessor extent development
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yes we can, and its not like he doesn't sook it up now!!

The point was that the club wouldn't, a disgruntled player is far worse than a sook. That's why no club has ever matched a restricted free agency offer and trade players who request trade around 75% of the time. Gws were never going to keep boyd and dogs were never going to keep griffin. This is all hypothetical at the moment anyway.
 
Agree that he would be a monumental upgrade in our best 22 as this wouldn't require much
However if he cannot get a game in a top four side under one of the best coaches then alarm bells start to ring as he may improve us , but yet again not enough to he competitive
Grigg pets Hunt Chaplin Thomas Morris so on so on are all players in this mould . They took us to 8th and that's it
I'm in for absolute A graders only bc I'm over battlers as its dragged on for too long
Saints are after Sloane I hear. If we get beaten to the line by them then I suspect the war chest is loaded up Monopoly money
We all know the saints will get him over us just because richmond dont have the balls to offer what is required to get so.eo e of his caliber
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

We all know the saints will get him over us just because richmond dont have the balls to offer what is required to get so.eo e of his caliber

Fair enough to because Sloane is not nearly worth what you think he is to us. Good luck to the Saints if they get Sloane but frankly for RFC Shiel will be a far more important player for us!:cool:
 
We all know the saints will get him over us just because richmond dont have the balls to offer what is required to get so.eo e of his caliber
Sloane would want 800K
Sheil 550K
Work it out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom