4b2’s son. Might be a 600 noggin, won’t do much damageWhom is this 2b4 you are referring?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
4b2’s son. Might be a 600 noggin, won’t do much damageWhom is this 2b4 you are referring?
Exactly, Teague is probably on the shortlist with Voss Scott and who knows who else.Nobody has ruled Teague out. Not Judd, not Liddle, nobody. Don't read into the media hysteria surrounding Judd's comments. It was taken out of context for a headline. He clarified this on Tuesday morning and again tonight on Triple M. The 'training wheels' comment was not directed at Teague.
Sort of a bit like Hacksaw Jim Duggan?It’s a piece of 4 inch by 2 inch timber that the Bearded one uses to dish out justice when needed.
Hopefully Ratts is on the short list as wellExactly, Teague is probably on the shortlist with Voss Scott and who knows who else.
The whole no coach ting makes for some interesting discussion though
Time will reveal all
Absolutely, that’s how I pictured it anywaySort of a bit like Hacksaw Jim Duggan?
Yep, here’s hoping. Would he want to come back though? I wouldn’t be too displeased if he did.Hopefully Ratts is on the short list as well
The massive jump in salary would cure any previous resentments (sacking)Yep, here’s hoping. Would he want to come back though? I wouldn’t be too displeased if he did.
I just don’t think I could fathom Scott or Voss in our coaches box, but it’s all out of our hands.
Wait and hope
This is an odd post.
MLG is the president, Judd's the Head of Football Operations; why wouldn't they be on the selection panel to recruit a coach? Why are they under the pump? Judd has said what? Your post uses 'suggests' and 'seems' and 'must'; there is an air of connotation to your post, bringing in hints of destabilization. And the last comment, too: 'Let's hope that wiser heads behind the scenes end up having a beneficial influence'; what is that? What does that mean?
You sound like Caroline Wilson. Either speak plainly or shut up.
Because he wants Ratten and the board are yet to agree.I don’t know about the rest of you but increasingly I lack confidence in the coaching selection panel to make the right decision. This pre-occupation with choosing someone who has been a senior coach in a rapidly shrinking market of available candidates will probably mean that they’ll pick from the last two standing, who are probably going to be Scott and Voss. Neither seem appropriate to me.
Why are MLG and Judd on the selection panel? They are two directors who are under the pump. Judd has said and done a number of things that suggest to me that he has poor judgment. Being a great footballer doesn’t mean you are suited to being the football person on the Board. And to compound the problem he is in the media, with all the conflict of interest problems that raises.
MLG must feel that he is fighting for his presidency after the failed Bolton experiment.
Let’s hope that wiser heads behind the scenes end up having a beneficial influence.
can do a lot if used correctly.4b2’s son. Might be a 600 noggin, won’t do much damage
What about Nancy and Frank Sinatras Saying Something Stupid Like I Love You.A duet? I request 'Jackson', the old Nancy Sinatra- Lee Hazlewood classic.
I'm not sure but wouldn't Lloyd answer to Judd?MLG and Adrian Gleeson weren't on the last panel to appoint the coach. (Judd was involved but not as a director)
(BTW - Judd isn't the Head of Football. LLyod is. His portfolio is Football and List management.)
MLG is under the pump and should be, as he publicly tied himself to Bolton. I doubt all the heat has left that room just yet.
Surprised that Thomas is not being offered another contract as well. Must be more to it than meets the eye because on form you would think he’s earned another year.Would be surprising if we cut daisy. Offers leadership and an experience body.
Has been playing well this year, would def keep him around another year
This seems the logical way to go. Problem when signing up an “experienced” coach we’ll also have to give them a long contract. Best we get it right.They only want Clarkson. He is presently unavailable.
Why not give Teague a 2 year contract. If he does well. End of search.
If he doesn’t set the world on fire then, after another year or two, and if Hawthorn are going nowhere, Clarkson may become available.
Agree with you and I don’t know why the club won’t get on with the announcement.Don’t think there is a shortlist.
Reckon we have our man/men.
Hopefully Teague continues as a senior assistant.
It’s a piece of 4 inch by 2 inch timber that the Bearded one uses to dish out justice when needed.
I'd rather Thy as head coach with Jimmae as coaching director than Brad Scott.
Sonny and Cher, 'I got you babe.'What about Nancy and Frank Sinatras Saying Something Stupid Like I Love You.
So if you were our list manager you'd move on all of Simmo/Daisy/Murphy...despite Murphy having a contract and Daisy being in good form and publicly stating he wants to play on. You'd happily alienate 3 of our most loyal servants in a soulless manner.
You'd also then happily sacrifice SPS or Fisher for B Hill...2 guys who look like future guns and are part of our elite young talent we want to develop into our core group...despite the fact we'd definitely find a way through draft picks.
I'm glad you're not in charge.
Voss was a great player but an equally terrible coach. Why would we choose someone who failed miserably the first time round has me stumped.Scott will be St Kilda coach
Which leaves Teague, Ratts or god forbid Voss
He said in an interview our 3 year offer was insulting. Who knows what that means. He got a 4 year deal from the Cats. They're not known for overpaying.
I hate the word hateHate this term.
Makes it sounds like the ammo’s.
When they are earning $500,000 per year ($10,000 per week) - they don’t qualify as “servants”.
Agree with you and I don’t know why the club won’t get on with the announcement.
The speculation is ridiculous and petty, so over hyped, footy shows and media involvement is becoming a farce and a distraction .
If ratten is interested in the job and he doesn’t make the shortlist, then the board needs to go. That would be a clear indication that the board is acting in its own self interest and self preservation at the expense of the clubs success.Yep, here’s hoping. Would he want to come back though? I wouldn’t be too displeased if he did.
I just don’t think I could fathom Scott or Voss in our coaches box, but it’s all out of our hands.
Wait and hope
Alternatively Ratten may not nominate if the current board remains. Maybe there is bad blood.If ratten is interested in the job and he doesn’t make the shortlist, then the board needs to go. That would be a clear indication that the board is acting in its own self interest and self preservation at the expense of the clubs success.
If this was genuinely the case, I would be absolutely filthy.