Not sure about the disciplinary angle but if the intent is to re-rookie then it's quite a common practice for players on the last year of a contract.
We've brought in 6 mature-agers, so Clem slides down the pecking order. Not having Malthouse around as his backer, he won't be gifted games unless we have a LTI in any case.
We've brought in 6 mature-agers, so Clem slides down the pecking order. Not having Malthouse around as his backer, he won't be gifted games unless we have a LTI in any case.
Yes but if he has not even completed 1 year of a 2 year contract, and he isn't suffering from a major injury, then I could see him/his manager/the AFLPA kicking up a GIANT stink about the club delisting and rooking him. Otherwise what is the point of the 2 year contract for 1st year players ??? They need security and this gives them little/none .......

