Why the fu** is crouch looking at GC metalcrusher please explain!!!
One way or another, more cash robbo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why the fu** is crouch looking at GC metalcrusher please explain!!!
Come on mate spill it!!Slow news day, or is it....
Do not want then.One way or another, more cash robbo
Do not want then.
Fair callAn AFL career is a decade to fifteen years. More if you're exceeding lucky to have a mostly good run like Simmo.
If you were on 400-500k per year and suddenly a team offered more than twice that - frontloaded too - it would be incredibly difficult to turn it down. Loyalty to your family must come first as the second you break down and can no longer do what you once did the club will push you out.
I do not begrudge Crouch at all. The Blues were offering somewhere in the vicinity of 650-700k which over a 4 year deal is a million more than the Crows. That he can ma make a million on top of that and become a real leader, something Adelaide has overlooked him for, is bloody tempting.
An AFL career is a decade to fifteen years. More if you're exceeding lucky to have a mostly good run like Simmo.
Fair call
Actually on the average an AFL career is about 3 years. But the stats are skewed because so many don't make itAn AFL career is a decade to fifteen years. More if you're exceeding lucky to have a mostly good run like Simmo.
If you were on 400-500k per year and suddenly a team offered more than twice that - frontloaded too - it would be incredibly difficult to turn it down. Loyalty to your family must come first as the second you break down and can no longer do what you once did the club will push you out.
I do not begrudge Crouch at all. The Blues were offering somewhere in the vicinity of 650-700k which over a 4 year deal is a million more than the Crows. That he can ma make a million on top of that and become a real leader, something Adelaide has overlooked him for, is bloody tempting.
I would SO love for one if the ITKs to respond to this with a random name. It'd send this place into a tailspin.Anyone Im missing?
I would SO love for one if the ITKs to respond to this with a random name. It'd send this place into a tailspin.
Give it a shot and take into consideration -
1. Our needs
2. Prospective targets' situation (Contract - Opportunity - Personal situation - Happiness?)
3. Bang for buck
We can go back weeks now and the names Coniglio, Papley and Martin made sense. Even Betts and Butler to a lesser extent make sense.
Take into account also that without trading out premium quality players of our own, the only real asset we have after our primary capture is our 2020 1st.
Given we missed on Coniglio, a quality midfielder makes the most sense and then you have to find a club that is happy trading quality for a future pick.
Gold Coast and GWS make most sense.
Gold Coast because they've plenty of new kids coming their way this year.
GWS because they can afford to sit and wait...to some degree at least, given they get a relatively free hit at Green this year and are holding two first rounders as things stand already.
It may even involve another club, but these two seem to make the most sense in acquiring a future pick
SEN reports from this morning that B Crouch could be headed to GC.
It would be an opportunity missed for any Victorian club - especially us - if we didn’t chase him if he wants out.
Hope the question is being asked...
Speculation Harks, or do you know something and you are dropping clues?Give it a shot and take into consideration -
1. Our needs
2. Prospective targets' situation (Contract - Opportunity - Personal situation - Happiness?)
3. Bang for buck
We can go back weeks now and the names Coniglio, Papley and Martin made sense. Even Betts and Butler to a lesser extent make sense.
Take into account also that without trading out premium quality players of our own, the only real asset we have after our primary capture is our 2020 1st.
Given we missed on Coniglio, a quality midfielder makes the most sense and then you have to find a club that is happy trading quality for a future pick.
Gold Coast and GWS make most sense.
Gold Coast because they've plenty of new kids coming their way this year.
GWS because they can afford to sit and wait...to some degree at least, given they get a relatively free hit at Green this year and are holding two first rounders as things stand already.
It may even involve another club, but these two seem to make the most sense in acquiring a future pick
They were prepared to for Shiel and cogs thoughHe wants 5 years on more money than what he is actually worth.
SOS and The board have a responsible and prudent attitude in not paying overs contract wise for any player.
Happy to save our Dollarydoos for now and go for broke for Whitfield next year.
Give it a shot and take into consideration -
1. Our needs
2. Prospective targets' situation (Contract - Opportunity - Personal situation - Happiness?)
3. Bang for buck
We can go back weeks now and the names Coniglio, Papley and Martin made sense. Even Betts and Butler to a lesser extent make sense.
Take into account also that without trading out premium quality players of our own, the only real asset we have after our primary capture is our 2020 1st.
Given we missed on Coniglio, a quality midfielder makes the most sense and then you have to find a club that is happy trading quality for a future pick.
Gold Coast and GWS make most sense.
Gold Coast because they've plenty of new kids coming their way this year.
GWS because they can afford to sit and wait...to some degree at least, given they get a relatively free hit at Green this year and are holding two first rounders as things stand already.
It may even involve another club, but these two seem to make the most sense in acquiring a future pick
Give it a shot and take into consideration -
1. Our needs
2. Prospective targets' situation (Contract - Opportunity - Personal situation - Happiness?)
3. Bang for buck
We can go back weeks now and the names Coniglio, Papley and Martin made sense. Even Betts and Butler to a lesser extent make sense.
Take into account also that without trading out premium quality players of our own, the only real asset we have after our primary capture is our 2020 1st.
Given we missed on Coniglio, a quality midfielder makes the most sense and then you have to find a club that is happy trading quality for a future pick.
Gold Coast and GWS make most sense.
Gold Coast because they've plenty of new kids coming their way this year.
GWS because they can afford to sit and wait...to some degree at least, given they get a relatively free hit at Green this year and are holding two first rounders as things stand already.
It may even involve another club, but these two seem to make the most sense in acquiring a future pick
Stop giving it away.....well at least you did name 2 clubs
We will not pay overs for any player, so let’s save the money so we can pay overs for Whitfield next year.He wants 5 years on more money than what he is actually worth.
SOS and The board have a responsible and prudent attitude in not paying overs contract wise for any player.
Happy to save our Dollarydoos for now and go for broke for Whitfield next year.
Actually on the average an AFL career is about 3 years. But the stats are skewed because so many don't make it
On CPH1831 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Honestly - just had a squizz at both lists.
GCS
Apart from Martin I can't see too many mids I'd be interested in - Maybe Fiorini - but is he worth trading out a 1st?.
GWS
Can't see too many they'd let go for a solitary 1st...
Maybe someone like Jacob Hopper? Good size and age profile, and we've been interested before.
doubt they'd let Hopper go for a future first...same with Williams.
I'd be all over either though...
What if - our future first for Caldwell and a 2nd in this draft?
doubt they'd let Hopper go for a future first...same with Williams.
I'd be all over either though...
What if - our future first for Caldwell and a 2nd in this draft?