- Joined
- May 5, 2009
- Posts
- 22,688
- Reaction score
- 31,313
- AFL Club
- Essendon
St Kilda won tactically. We had no answer to their flood.
You don't overcome a flood with tactics.
The players just need to think their way through the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

St Kilda won tactically. We had no answer to their flood.
Safe/slow ball retention wasn't the plan, Thompson has consistently said he wanted them to move the ball faster and more directly.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-05-17/mark-thompson-postmatch-r9-2014-
The players simply execute it better now.
You don't overcome a flood with tactics.
The players just need to think their way through the game.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think Clarkson's coaching has made his list look like it has more depth than it actually has.Agreed - does that speak to the depth of the roster or the coach though?
(I'd say roster considering Hawks kept Hawking on despite Clarksons unfortuante hospital visit)
I think Clarkson's coaching has made his list look like it has more depth than it actually has.
In terms of Clarko not being there for a month, I think they way that he coaches (and Bomber) is that they are such great teachers, that they can walk away for a period of time and the teams continues to be successful.
It would take a lot for somebody to convince me that Bomber was not the main reason Geelong won a premiership in 2011, despite not being there. He taught those players not only how to play, but how to coach themselves on field during a match. We're starting to see some of that come through now with players directing and instructing on field more than I've ever seen us do.
That is the genius in what Clarko and Bomber do - they develop a self-facilitating team that is able to coach themselves in many areas. They're not waiting on being told what to do every waking minute.
I think that's the only way Bomber would stay on as Senior Coach, I got the impression early on that if the board tried to approach him behind Hird's back he'd tell them to get stuffed.What I personally would like to see happen is Hird by his own admission come in and say to Bomber and Little "I want to come back and finish what I started but would like to do it as an assistant under bomber for the next 2 years and learn the caper from one of the best". I have no doubt Hirdy will be senior coach of the EFC again in the future just hoping bomber has a fair good go at it first for at least another 2 years. Has the capability of turning a good team into a premiership team (he's done it before)
Not sure Hirdy will give it up though. I love them both so whatever happens happens I guess
Bit harsh on Hird that now we are suddenly seen to be doing well he shouldnt coach and Bomber should stay on. There is no reason Hird cant be senior coach and Bomber can stay on in a development role. We have improved every year under Hird, we have improved under Bomber but who says the same thing wouldnt have happened under Hird? I think its a bit disrepectful to go "umm James we are winning atm so do you mind sitting back while Bomber gets some plaudits and wins some games with the team you helped build, and then when the team has peaked you can come in for its inevitable decline, Cheers mate".
The Prosecutor this isnt directed at you as i know you have been strong on Hird not coming back the whole time, more at people who have suddenly changed their minds after quickly changing their minds earlier in the season when we started doing poorly under Bomber. People hitch their wagon to whatever is the flavor of the month, its why the Media are so woeful.
Bit harsh on Hird that now we are suddenly seen to be doing well he shouldnt coach and Bomber should stay on. There is no reason Hird cant be senior coach and Bomber can stay on in a development role. We have improved every year under Hird, we have improved under Bomber but who says the same thing wouldnt have happened under Hird? I think its a bit disrepectful to go "umm James we are winning atm so do you mind sitting back while Bomber gets some plaudits and wins some games with the team you helped build, and then when the team has peaked you can come in for its inevitable decline, Cheers mate".
The Prosecutor this isnt directed at you as i know you have been strong on Hird not coming back the whole time, more at people who have suddenly changed their minds after quickly changing their minds earlier in the season when we started doing poorly under Bomber. People hitch their wagon to whatever is the flavor of the month, its why the Media are so woeful.
To be perfectly honest, the more I find out about the behind the scenes machinations from 2011/2012, the stronger my opinion that Hird shouldn't return.
I think Bomber is doing an outstanding job.
For a man who is only in the seat for a season, it would have been easy for him to simply foot his foot to the floor, disregard any future considerations and play our strongest team week in week out.
And we'd likely end up exactly where we've been the last few years.
The game plan isn't the problem.
We've got several senior players who are/were out of form, a consistent and deliberate policy of getting games into our younger players, and a forward line that we know is a work in progress.
We've played pretty poorly, yet we are still 4-5. And I don't think we've been this well placed to head into a second half of a season in a long time. Fit list, lots of experience into youngsters and a consistent game plan.
The ASADA horseshit is clearly having an effect - but that's out of our control.
Looking forward to the remainder of the year.
Bomber took Geelong and made them into one of the best teams in history. He is a proven, brilliant coach.
I dont understand this obsession with Hird and discounting Bomber if Hird returns. Sure Hird is great guy, a playing legend and has "respect" by many ppl in Essendon but his coaching is a roll of the dice. Why are so many ppl willing to putt him before Bomber for 2015?