Opinion Bottom 4 and top 4 teams in 3 years

Discussion in 'Lists' started by Feder98, May 31, 2010.

Put it out there
  1. LicoriceAllsorts

    LicoriceAllsorts Brownlow Medallist

    Brisbane Lions
    Other teams:
    Denver Broncos, Denver Nuggets
    Joined:
    Feb 13
    Posts:
    29,614
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Top 4:
    GWS
    Bulldogs
    Demons
    Saints

    Bottom 4:
    Tigers
    Kangaroos
    Port Adelaide
    Collingwood
     
    12Chill likes this.

    (Log in to remove this ad.)

  2. frenchfri12

    frenchfri12 Suspended

    Essendon
    Other teams:
    Joined:
    Jul 12
    Posts:
    3,156
    Top 4:
    GWS
    St. Kilda
    Bulldogs
    Melbourne

    Bottom 4:
    Richmond
    Collingwood
    Geelong
    Hawthorn
     
  3. Kangaroos4eva

    Kangaroos4eva Brownlow Medallist

    North Melbourne
    Other teams:
    West Ham United
    Joined:
    Aug 12
    Posts:
    28,379
    Location:
    NSW
    A bit harsh on port and the pies. As for us, I'm almost willing to bet my account that we won't finish bottom 4.
     
  4. frenchconnection

    frenchconnection Club Legend

    West Coast
    Other teams:
    Joined:
    Aug 09
    Posts:
    2,724
    Location:
    Wembley downs
    Think you are getting a bit carried away there.:rolleyes: Not saying that there won't be improvement by some of those teams but think trading has changed things a fair bit which means a team like say Hawthorn will be thereabouts. Successful teams over a number of years most times seem to be able to attract players on the move. I'm just usung Hawthorn as an example of course!
     
  5. treefingers

    treefingers the mighty hawks

    Hawthorn
    Other teams:
    Joined:
    Jan 08
    Posts:
    5,995
    Well, I got Sydney and Brisbane. Bit of wishful thinking with Geelong down there though
     
  6. FlowersByIrene

    FlowersByIrene Brownlow Medallist

    Carlton
    Other teams:
    Knicks, Giants, Man U
    Joined:
    Apr 12
    Posts:
    14,496
    Location:
    Perth via Carlton Land
    One year on;

    2016: Hawthorn were top 4 before the finals, finished fifth, WBD were 7th but went on to win. West Coast were fifth but finished 7th. Freo no where near it. As for the bottom four, got Essendon and Brisbane spot on, underestimated my Blueboys, but was only out by two spots, and underestemiated St Kilda.

    2017: I wouldn't change a lot; besides taking Gold Coast out of the top 4 and putting them into the bottom 4. I'll take Geelong out and replace them with GC. I'll put Sydney in the top 4 in place of GC. Actually Richmond need to be bottom four somewhere, maybe take Essendon out as well
    Top 4: (1) GWS (2) WBD (3) Sydney (4) WCE
    Bottom 4 (18) Brisbane (17) Richmond (16) GC (15) North

    2018: I'll keep roughly the same, I didnt expect Essendon to be rewarded for cheating with Pick #1 so I see them climbing out of the bottom #4. Fremantle won't be bottom 4 but i'll keep North and Geelong in there for now. Richmon will stay, and Brisbane probably arent getting fixed any time soon. As for the top #4, GC wont be there obviously; i'll back the Blues and think Melbourne will be the other side

    Top 4: (1) GWS (2) Dogs (3) Melb (4) Carlton
    Bottom 4: (18) North (17) Richmond (16) Geelong (15) Brisbane
     
  7. SaintsSeptember

    SaintsSeptember Hall of Famer

    St Kilda
    Other teams:
    .
    Joined:
    Mar 08
    Posts:
    31,257
    Location:
    Narre Warren North
    AFL didn't expect the Wada ban, so prematurely stripped picks from the cheats. They can't really do it again.
     
    Bipolarbear likes this.
  8. FlowersByIrene

    FlowersByIrene Brownlow Medallist

    Carlton
    Other teams:
    Knicks, Giants, Man U
    Joined:
    Apr 12
    Posts:
    14,496
    Location:
    Perth via Carlton Land
    They definitely could.. they wont because they've done everything to prop that club up during the whole process; but they should have
     
  9. SaintsSeptember

    SaintsSeptember Hall of Famer

    St Kilda
    Other teams:
    .
    Joined:
    Mar 08
    Posts:
    31,257
    Location:
    Narre Warren North
    So what would be the justification given that they have already taken draft picks.
    Are you suggesting they can continually punish for the same actions.

    What i believe is that if WADA also applies to team sports they need to get their heads outside the olympics/cycing box and get a suitable system, which would also include performance based drafting after the year of penalty.
    .
     
    Bipolarbear likes this.
  10. Bipolarbear

    Bipolarbear Browns Fan

    Essendon
    Other teams:
    Parramatta, San Antonio, Everton
    Joined:
    May 08
    Posts:
    19,745
    Location:
    Hobart
    :rolleyes: Ah yes, and what would you have liked? two years worth of first rounders, millions of dollars in fines, taken out of the finals when we had a certain first round one win, players copping a one year ban, first wooden spoon in 75 years. Keep beating the nonsensical drum FBI, we came last, we deserve the pick.
     
    bomberman31 likes this.
  11. JRyan23

    JRyan23 All Australian

    Carlton
    Other teams:
    Gold Coast Suns, Charlotte Hornets
    Joined:
    Oct 16
    Posts:
    669
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Top 4 in 2020: 1. GWS, 2. Port 3. St. Kilda 4. Gold Coast
    Bottom 4: Hawthorn, Geelong, Essendon, Collingwood
     

    (Log in to remove this ad.)

  12. The Blue Baggers

    The Blue Baggers Club Legend

    Carlton
    Other teams:
    Joined:
    Apr 13
    Posts:
    2,798
    Top 4

    Carlton
    Giants
    Saints
    Bulldogs

    Bottom

    Geelong
    Hawks
    Collingwood
    Richmond
     
  13. Skipper_

    Skipper_ Club Legend

    Essendon
    Other teams:
    Joined:
    Sep 16
    Posts:
    1,859
    Top 4

    Giants
    Saints
    Demons
    Bulldogs

    Bottom 4

    Fremantle
    Hawthorn
    Port Adelaide
    Geelong