I have no idea how to respond to that. You can ask 'what if' about everything. I am just calling it how I see it and from the knowledge I have.What if they've been told not to inflame tensions by shooting people?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea how to respond to that. You can ask 'what if' about everything. I am just calling it how I see it and from the knowledge I have.What if they've been told not to inflame tensions by shooting people?
I have no idea how to respond to that. You can ask 'what if' about everything. I am just calling it how I see it and from the knowledge I have.
get absolutely ****ed, is that a real quote?
I did some very basic knife training many years ago (and granted, it was rather informal and training changes over time), and the first rule about self-defence against a knife attacker is (I quote) "Run like the ******* wind". Trying to disarm someone is as last-resort as it gets.FFS, this didn't require anything special.
If cops aren't taught basic hand to hand defence techniques (AND THEY ARE) then we may as well not have cops.
I mean it's probably appropriate that the guy used the symbol of Melbourne's cafe hipster culture, a bentwood chair, to try and bring this guy down.'Straya
https://www.theguardian.com/austral...rolley-to-try-to-take-down-melbourne-attacker
Trolley man: passers-by use chair and trolley to try to take down Melbourne attacker
I agree, really. Given a choice between being too trigger-happy and too slow on the draw, I'd have to go with the latter. You can't take back a bullet once it's been fired.
Confirmed dead by Police gunshot right now in the press conference 30mins after he arrived in hospital.
Also confirmed he was known to Police and ASIO for terrorist links and it is now being treated as a terrorism event.
Press conference live now on the ABC.
I was going to say something along those lines, but you really never know. I mean, maybe they brass are pushing for better optics and PR by disincentives information use of firearms. I doubt they would ever be referring to a situation like this, but stranger things have happened.As if cops are ever told something like that.
I did some very basic knife training many years ago (and granted, it was rather informal and training changes over time), and the first rule about self-defence against a knife attacker is (I quote) "Run like the ******* wind". Trying to disarm someone is as last-resort as it gets.
The most obvious example is Gargasoulis. Had they used more force prior to him reaching Bourke St, many lives would have been saved. IMO, the moment someone decides to evade Police they loose the right to live. Police should be allowed to shoot offenders, if safe to do so, the moment this happens. In the Gargasoulis situation they had numerous opportunities to use more force but chose not to for fear of the legal repercussions.numerous examples, but from today's incident, allowing an armed offender to get within striking distance and not shooting him
thus being ineffectual in protecting themselves and the public
American cops - shoot first, ask questions later
Australian cops - let's talk it out, let a few people get injured, then clean up the mess, investigation suggests police should have been more proactive
I was going to say something along those lines, but you really never know. I mean, maybe they brass are pushing for better optics and PR by disincentives information use of firearms. I doubt they would ever be referring to a situation like this, but stranger things have happened.
You do what you can. Hell, I'd even try the "Look over there!" while pointing behind them trick first.Of course, but what if you were cornered with that guy? You take the hand the moment it comes down and neutralise it..
The most obvious example is Gargasoulis. Had they used more force prior to him reaching Bourke St, many lives would have been saved. IMO, the moment someone decides to evade Police they loose the right to live. Police should be allowed to shoot offenders, if safe to do so, the moment this happens. In the Gargasoulis situation they had numerous opportunities to use more force but chose not to for fear of the legal repercussions.
You do what you can. Hell, I'd even try the "Look over there!" while pointing behind them trick first.
I did some very basic knife training many years ago (and granted, it was rather informal and training changes over time), and the first rule about self-defence against a knife attacker is (I quote) "Run like the ******* wind". Trying to disarm someone is as last-resort as it gets.
Someone posted the video of 20 london police being totally embarrassed by one man with a knife. I wonder if that is what the majority of Australia wants for us now too? Shoot him in the leg? wtf the guy just butchered multiple people and is now attacking the cops.
Already got the "Mental illness" brigade in here acting like with the right dosage of Xanax this guy wouldn't have done anything. Our society may be completely gone in a couple decades with these people having any say at all.
The Israelis have Krav Maga
This video from the U.K shows a similar incident, with a bloke weilding a machete disarmed
shan isnt really a keyboard warrior lmfaoooooooooooooooWhy?
He was using the correct techniques they are trained with to disarm men with knifes.
Nobody got hurt from the moment they arrived and they did all they could not to use lethal force.
So many keyboard warriors
You don't know what your talking about. Medications are linked to incidents like this for which successful law suits have been launched against drug manufacturers.
The guy in America yesterday who killed eleven people. Experts in these crimes are pointing to the history of these events committed by people on these drugs.
You have no idea