Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.


Potential 3 way trade if Griffen wants to head to Port. Not trying to say it's fair, just throwing it out there for some feedback on winners/losers and for general criticism.
Port gain: Ebert, Griffen, 45, 63
Port lose: 28, 33, 51
Eagles gain: 33, 38
Eagles lose: Ebert, 45, 63
Dockers gain: 28, 51
Dockers lose: 38, Griffen
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I don't think I'd trade 28 and 33 for Brad.
There is speculation Port could pick up Longer at 6 - why would we get Griffin if Longer is on the radar?
I think we'll get Ebert for 28 and even then I think 33 is more realistic. I think it's more likely Griffin might go to the PSD with Freo's unrealistic expectations. Personally I hope we don't get him. Play the young guys and get a mature aged rookie ruckman who can play if one of them goes down.
The messages you hear from the media and from Port aren't consistent. Port are saying they want to get games into Redden how do we do that if we get Griffin?
There is speculation Port could pick up Longer at 6 - why would we get Griffin if Longer is on the radar?
because longer wont be ready for 3-4 years. look at all the early first round ruckman who have been taken in the draft in years past. those without support who get played too early have their careers severely hindered and affected by injury.
He is 21/22 and had already played a season of VFL, hardly an 18 year old draftee. Leuenberger would be a better example to compare to, and he has only started hitting his straps in the past 2 seasons.Zac Smith???
I think we'll get Ebert for 28 and even then I think 33 is more realistic. I think it's more likely Griffin might go to the PSD with Freo's unrealistic expectations. Personally I hope we don't get him. Play the young guys and get a mature aged rookie ruckman who can play if one of them goes down.
im going to give some clarification here for you guys.
1. ebert wont be going in the psd as i am 100% certain he holds the club with much higher regard than that and the eagles have a history of making sure a fair trade gets done.
2. the eagles wont be accepting of picks 28 or 33 on their own. dispute it all you like but it wont be happening. this draft is quality for a about 15 picks, then its a lucky dip until about pick 30-35 and blind freddy would have as much success as the best recruiters after that.
3. the eagles will be looking at using 2, maybe 3 draft picks in this draft so any talk of 3rd round draft picks is pointless.
4. the eagles are looking to fill a couple of list holes with established players over the offseason. whether that is through trades or through seconds league players we'll see.
Believe me or not this is how it will happen and while ebert wont go down as a superstar player or a player with flair i would be willing to take any money that he will be in the top 10 players from the 2007 draft in games played once they reach the end of their careers.
Longterm i very much expect him to have a similar career to lingy and anybody suggesting the chances are likely of getting a better player with a pick outside 20 in the weakest draft of the professional drafting era are kidding themselves.
im going to give some clarification here for you guys.
1. ebert wont be going in the psd as i am 100% certain he holds the club with much higher regard than that and the eagles have a history of making sure a fair trade gets done.
2. the eagles wont be accepting of picks 28 or 33 on their own. dispute it all you like but it wont be happening. this draft is quality for a about 15 picks, then its a lucky dip until about pick 30-35 and blind freddy would have as much success as the best recruiters after that.
3. the eagles will be looking at using 2, maybe 3 draft picks in this draft so any talk of 3rd round draft picks is pointless.
4. the eagles are looking to fill a couple of list holes with established players over the offseason. whether that is through trades or through seconds league players we'll see.
Believe me or not this is how it will happen and while ebert wont go down as a superstar player or a player with flair i would be willing to take any money that he will be in the top 10 players from the 2007 draft in games played once they reach the end of their careers.
Longterm i very much expect him to have a similar career to lingy and anybody suggesting the chances are likely of getting a better player with a pick outside 20 in the weakest draft of the professional drafting era are kidding themselves.
Any sources for any of this or just pure speculation?
Problem with our second picks is that we need them.
Out brogan, cornes, motlop, motlop, Meyer
In ebert plus 4 draft picks currently 6, 28,33 and 50ish
Give up a second rounder and we will really be picking dregs or maybe someone in psd. Even if we give Surjan we still have to find an additional under 50 pick. So maybe it will go
Surjan, pick 33
Ebert, pick 45
Any sources for any of this or just pure speculation?
He is 21/22 and had already played a season of VFL, hardly an 18 year old draftee. Leuenberger would be a better example to compare to, and he has only started hitting his straps in the past 2 seasons.
And NicNat wasn't holding down 1st ruck in his first season, and only started becoming consistent this season (his 3rd).