Traded Brad Hill [traded with future 3rd to St Kilda for Acres, #10, #58, future 2nd and 4th]

Who won this trade?

  • Fremantle

    Votes: 5 100.0%
  • St Kilda

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Which is why they will get pick 5, which is already overs for a contracted, outside player.

Thats not overs. You havent really explained why its in freos interests to trade him for 5.
 
Thats not overs. You havent really explained why its in freos interests to trade him for 5.
Because he doesn't want to be there, it's the second year in a row he has asked to be traded and they can get a top 5 pick for him which is conveniently before their own pick which will be favourable come draft night.

Suggesting he is worth more than pick 5 would be saying he is in the very top echelon of players in the competition, which he isnt.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Why does Acres keep getting brought up?

He's contracted, hasn't requested a trade and isn't very good based off his last 2 years.

Baffling.
Acre's would be a handy pick up. If we got him and 5 for Hill we'd be doing well. 5 seems like a decent return for a guy who wants to leave. Get it done move on.
 
What about this , hill and next years 4th round pick for pick 5 plus Acres, I can't do any better than that.
 
Which is why they will get pick 5, which is already overs for a contracted, outside player.

It’s so cute when they think they’re in charge.
 
Back
Top