gillo94
Norm Smith Medallist
Brad Hill for me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brad was being knocked for being a soft player a couple 2 years ago.I'm reading it as Brad gets a few more uncontested possessions (in a team that's way better than Stephens, in a higher possession footy style overall), but Stephen beats him in goals, clearances, contested possessions, and one percenters, (you know the kind of important stuff) which is ironic considering Stephen used to get knocked for being a soft outside player. I wonder what that makes Brad?
Brads heaps good. But hes not on stephens level.I couldnt imagine the absolute belting B Hill would cop if he recieved a Crowley tag. Stephen on the other hand has dealt with tags his whole career and gotten to the stage where he's still having a very good impact on games (20+ possies) whilst getting a hard run with player- almost ready to break out atm.
Crowley would keep brad hill to 8 touches.Crowley wouldn't be able to keep up.
Maybe not 8 touches but he would go alright on him.Crowley would keep brad hill to 8 touches.
I couldnt imagine the absolute belting B Hill would cop if he recieved a Crowley tag.
Hill would struggle to get the ball with crpwley nagging him all day. Think about it. If crowley did to hill what he does to steve johnson hill would do * allMaybe not 8 touches but he would go alright on him.
Johnson and Brad Hill are completely different players and in no universe can you compare them in this way. I am not saying Brad Hill would not struggle. I am saying using Johnson as your reasoning is silly.Hill would struggle to get the ball with crpwley nagging him all day. Think about it. If crowley did to hill what he does to steve johnson hill would do **** all
Johnson would be harder to tag then brad hillJohnson and Brad Hill are completely different players and in no universe can you compare them in this way. I am not saying Brad Hill would not struggle. I am saying using Johnson as your reasoning is silly.
2 completely different players. You cannot compare them. Hill requires a very different type of tag as he has one of the bigger tank in the game. Johnson is does not have that same attribute so he would attract a Crowley type tag. If Crowley would (unlikely as a host of others before him) get the job tagging Hill it would be on a rotational basis. Crowley would never be able to keep up with him.Johnson would be harder to tag then brad hill
Johnson would be harder to tag then brad hill
Stephen is once again stretching the gap, and yes I know its only 2 games in. He played the best game of his career yesterday and its a game Brad has not yet got close to.
Immense game from Stephen Hill, He's incredibly gifted, when he's delivering the ball inside 50 he utterly fools everyone, Even camera men who quickly jerk the camera because he's picked out a guy surrounded by 5 opposition jumpersStephen is once again stretching the gap, and yes I know its only 2 games in. He played the best game of his career yesterday and its a game Brad has not yet got close to.
Stephen is once again stretching the gap, and yes I know its only 2 games in. He played the best game of his career yesterday and its a game Brad has not yet got close to.
Imagine if Stephen got the same amount of space that Brad gets week in week out. Would be an AA lock.They don't even play the same role for starters. Stephen is better so far and probably will be for the remainder of his career, but as I've said before though Bradley Hill has outperformed Stephen in the finals over the last two years.
Imagine if Stephen got the same amount of space that Brad gets week in week out. Would be an AA lock.
Just on the finals, I wouldn't necessarily disagree, but Stephen has played some very good games. The final at Simonds he was awesome, people focus on the end goal but he had a great game before that as well. He also got 20 odd possessions in the GF, though he wasn't as damaging as he normally is.They don't even play the same role for starters. Stephen is better so far and probably will be for the remainder of his career, but as I've said before though Bradley Hill has outperformed Stephen in the finals over the last two years.
They don't even play the same role for starters.
Fair point. We also have to take into account that Hawthorn and Fremantle's game-plan are vastly different. Brad Hill is such a barrometer to our team, when he plays well, we win. With Stephen sometimes when he has an off game Fremantle still play quite well. I think we depend on Brad Hill playing well more then what Fremantle does for Stephen Hill in my opinion.