Sorry thought you meant AFL not VFL
-
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Traded Braydon Preuss [traded with #62 to Melbourne for Tyson]
- Thread starter Rod Stroker
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Cheers thanks for the level headed response you must be sick and tired of questions being asked of half your team.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Kangaroos4eva
TheBrownDog
Veteran
North Melbourne - Bella Eddey and Vicki Wall Player Sponsor - Season 7
North Melbourne - 2023 Aaron Hall and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
10k Posts
30k Posts
Chocolate
North Melbourne AFLW - 2021 Aileen Gilroy and Kaitlyn Ashmore Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2021 Taylor Garner and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
You won’t match what north’s offering and if you do, we won’t bother as we are knee deep into Polec and gaff would cost north too much in picks.
BLERN
Voted 2nd best BLERN on regularsizedfooty
- Oct 13, 2016
- 7,573
- 11,292
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Say you do force a trade and we dont have our first in the assumption we have already traded it to port for polec.
And add another assumption that we say our 2019 1st is off the table.
Can you see any other options or offers that would entertain west coast. I know that you would demand our 2019 first. Just curious if you see anything else that might make a worthwhile trade in those circumstances
Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,169
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Banned
- #356
The compo pick, because that's all they're getting.
Hopefully the AFL award them a pick before Carlton & GC(18).
BLERN
Voted 2nd best BLERN on regularsizedfooty
- Oct 13, 2016
- 7,573
- 11,292
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
I was just curious as to who/what we could even offer that would actually even be more beneficial than the compo.
Pruess and mountford are probably gettable but we really dont have much else that i can see interesting them. And i doubt they would see that as even close to appropriate value to make them match.
Our offer is clearly so much higher than they can justify matching for that reason.
blackshadow
Hall of Famer
Could join in for a Dahlhaus bukkake with that Ziebull campaigner
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
The only thing I can think of is a side trade where the Eagles allow Gaff to go as a FA and the Eagles trade in Goldie or Preuss for a 4th rounder.
I know the Eagles almost landed Anderson and you guys beat our offer, you wont want to let Joey going anywhere.
BLERN
Voted 2nd best BLERN on regularsizedfooty
- Oct 13, 2016
- 7,573
- 11,292
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Yeah i suppose if it came to it, something along those lines could potentially happen
There are some crazy theories in this thread. Why people think a trade is possible I just don't get.
The North offer is only so high because he is a free agent. If North traded for him the offer would be similar to what WC are currently offering and he would rather stay.
If West Coast are willing to match he would also stay.
Unless Gaff wants to come to North for similar to the current WC offer, there won't be a trade.
The North offer is only so high because he is a free agent. If North traded for him the offer would be similar to what WC are currently offering and he would rather stay.
If West Coast are willing to match he would also stay.
Unless Gaff wants to come to North for similar to the current WC offer, there won't be a trade.
Pretty sure that's draft tampering
- Mar 28, 2018
- 10,491
- 8,454
- AFL Club
- GWS
We had a reducing list. Your point is?
- Jun 15, 2012
- 786
- 2,288
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
The steak knives weren't very sharp though
- Nov 14, 2013
- 1,484
- 5,494
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Colts, Raptors, Milan, FU Crabs
The top part is referring to contract money, the bottom part is talking about draft capital.
Really not that hard to understand what he means.
Ok looks like i might have to elaborate
If they cant match what the roo's are offering then why the need to worry about having the draft capital to match ???
If you get it great , If you dont then please dont respond
- Nov 14, 2013
- 1,484
- 5,494
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Colts, Raptors, Milan, FU Crabs
That's exactly what was said, and that's why it looks like we aren't trying to move anything around to build up that draft capital in the unlikely event the eagles match.
What you are saying here is almost exactly the point he is making.
The cash offer is so high to deter WCE from matching because if they do we wont be trading.
Thats what he said
Thats what you said
If you don't get it don't bother replying
The point is GWS has off loaded a lot of reasonably talented players for nothing but cap space and the AFL allowed it.
We all know the your club is the new AFL's favourite son in NSW but other clubs should be able to do the same.
- Mar 28, 2018
- 10,491
- 8,454
- AFL Club
- GWS
Rubbish
We had a reducing list size.
If matched IMO Gaff would still go.
From reports he loves the Eagles and the players. He will be well paid where ever he goes.
The Brayshaw thing, family and friends in Melbourne and now a ill father are all non cash reasons to move.
Six clubs in Melbourne who would trade for him and pay more than the Eagles to land him as well.
Similar threads
