Sure. My original question was do you have an example of that in the field of criminal investigations?The reasoning is that sometimes even salient facts become a taboo, in both.
Maybe the #metoo thing, where for a time people jumped to conclusions, or Matt Damon got in trouble for differentiating between different levels of bad behaviour.Sure. My original question was do you have an example of that in the field of crime?
For me his point was, let's try and find out why he did it, was there any contributing factors that we can uncover to hopefully prevent this from ever happening again?His point was that in Marriage, violence against a partner can be sometimes be justified.
This is a shocking admission from a member of the same institution that endorses Marriage.
Sure that's fine. Happy with that. But let's not have Men's Rights groups jump on board and turn him into some sort of martyr either.For me his point was, let's try and find out why he did it, was there any contributing factors that we can uncover to hopefully prevent this from ever happening again?
If he was just a plain, jealous evil bastard then so be it but they have to look. On the other hand, the coppers could just say, he's dead, the wife and kids are dead, no one is going to get charged with anything, so why even bother. It's open and shut.
Maybe he was angry with the courts for denying him as much access as he wanted, maybe he wasn't even angry at her or the kids but he took his anger at the courts out on them. Who the fu** knows, but they have to try and find out.
There will be all sorts of things we don't know about. Have they absolutely, conclusively said he was 100% the perp yet, that's it's an open and shut, slamdunk case against him?
Everything we're hearing from family and friends say that he was a jealous, evil prick, I'd just like the coppers and coroner to dot their i's and cross their t's.
Sometimes with a certain kind of man, the jealous, evil, entitled kind where the image is more important than the reality and who assumes a self righteous ownership of his wife and kids an AVO can inflame them either further. Maybe that needs to be looked at because the bottom line is, they're utterly useless against this type.or me his point was, let's try and find out why he did it, was there any contributing factors that we can uncover to hopefully prevent this from ever happening again?
If he was just a plain, jealous evil bastard then so be it but they have to look.
They didn't with that prick, whom shall remain nameless, that threw his little girl off the Westgate Bridge and they didn't with John Sharpe who spear gunned his pregnant wife and little girl (he had to reload and shoot a 2nd time to finish her off).Sure that's fine. Happy with that. But let's not have Men's Rights groups jump on board and turn him into some sort of martyr either.
I've just read that she gave detailed information to emergency responders before she died. She did that with burns to 97% of her body. Incredible.For me his point was, let's try and find out why he did it, was there any contributing factors that we can uncover to hopefully prevent this from ever happening again?
If he was just a plain, jealous evil bastard then so be it but they have to look. On the other hand, the coppers could just say, he's dead, the wife and kids are dead, no one is going to get charged with anything, so why even bother. It's open and shut.
Maybe he was angry with the courts for denying him as much access as he wanted, maybe he wasn't even angry at her or the kids but he took his anger at the courts out on them. Who the fu** knows, but they have to try and find out.
There will be all sorts of things we don't know about. Have they absolutely, conclusively said he was 100% the perp yet, that's it's an open and shut, slamdunk case against him?
Everything we're hearing from family and friends say that he was a jealous, evil prick, I'd just like the coppers and coroner to dot their i's and cross their t's.
Were there custody issues involved with both of those crimes.They didn't with that prick, whom shall remain nameless, that threw his little girl off the Westgate Bridge and they didn't with John Sharpe who spear gunned his pregnant wife and little girl (he had to reload and shoot a 2nd time to finish her off).
Westgate Bridge yes, Mornington Monster I no, I think from memory that he just wanted out of the marriage.Were there custody issues involved with both of those crimes.
I was offered a job speaking to secondary students on this same thing, while I was thinking about how I could weave it in I had an accident and couldn't even string a sentence together for a while so that was out. I don't think anybody in the org followed through with it, great idea though.is it time we start teaching domestic violence and personality traits such as controlling behaviour etc
I'm thinking this should start in primary school, long before kids pursue meaningful relationships. Then when they do, they could be in an informed position and a little better aware of the dangers they find themselves in early.
Just tagging on to your discussion, why do you think this is the case?They didn't with that prick, whom shall remain nameless, that threw his little girl off the Westgate Bridge and they didn't with John Sharpe who spear gunned his pregnant wife and little girl (he had to reload and shoot a 2nd time to finish her off).
he was a lot of things martyr will never be one of themSure that's fine. Happy with that. But let's not have Men's Rights groups jump on board and turn him into some sort of martyr either.
I hope my next comment isn't taken as victim blaming...............I was offered a job speaking to secondary students on this same thing, while I was thinking about how I could weave it in I had an accident and couldn't even string a sentence together for a while so that was out. I don't think anybody in the org followed through with it, great idea though.
It's too late once you've been sucked into it and this might shock people but many women don't even see the signs until they're pregnant and showing, when at their most vulnerable. It can be so stunning and utterly terrifying, they just hope it was a one off stress incident or write it off as their pregnant brain skewing their perception.So the most powerful way is to teach individuals and society, how to recognise the warning signs. So people can avoid entering relationships and or getting out early. By educating society, we could see the warning signs and ask questions to help victims early.
I'm pro empowerment, education and choices
I'd also suggest some women find the same traits that end up being dangerous, quite attractive in the early stages.It's too late once you've been sucked into it and this might shock people but many women don't even see the signs until they're pregnant and showing, when at their most vulnerable. It can be so stunning and utterly terrifying, they just hope it was a one off stress incident or write it off as their pregnant brain skewing their perception.
The program though was to focus on recognition and choices.
That comes down to immaturity imo and it needs to be called. Women with men who have a history of violence should not think it will never come for them because it probably will.I'd also suggest some women find the same traits that end up being dangerous, quite attractive in the early stages.
That's the problem, most women especially younger ones are caught up In the "romance" and don't recognise the early warning signs. Afterwards it's hard to leave the relationship especially if she falls pregnantIt's too late once you've been sucked into it and this might shock people but many women don't even see the signs until they're pregnant and showing, when at their most vulnerable. It can be so stunning and utterly terrifying, they just hope it was a one off stress incident or write it off as their pregnant brain skewing their perception.
The program though was to focus on recognition and choices.