Brisbane Car Fire Deaths

[Lethality]

There won't be any charges and no court case to prosecute, the guy who burned his children to death is dead so WTAF was his point? It's a 1950's mindset that's given any narc going through a break up a sense of righteousness in violent acting out.

I assume they still have to do a post-mortem though. I think people are confusing cause with justification. Police are probably after the cause. As an outsider though it seems clear he was just an abusive prick from the beginning.

 

[Kurve]

I assume they still have to do a post-mortem though. I think people are confusing cause with justification. Police are probably after the cause. As an outsider though it seems clear he was just an abusive prick from the beginning.

Cop at the presser has been stood down from the investigation. Even if he was dragging for information and trying to draw out friends of the father, the message he sent to the wider community turned my stomach, it was so unnecessary. The cops can find all his friends on social media and out of the gym.

Just reading there was a history of violence, he was on bail after breaching an AVO.

 

[Lethality]

I worry that we're going to be badgered into not even publicly acknowledging any motive or circumstance or other piece of salient information, because it is seen as somehow diminishing the wrongness of the act.

 

[NSWCROW]

betty ardnt - not right in the head.

 

[NSWCROW]

International symbol for " rowan baxter "

 

[NSWCROW]

Absolutely Pathetic

Why?

ego

 

[Lethality]

International symbol for " rowan baxter "

View attachment 826570

There's nothing wrong with having a small dick. If we're going to dismantle toxic masculinity we probably have to stop making these kinds of jokes.

 

[Lethality]

betty ardnt - not right in the head.

I remember when she used to sound reasonable? Maybe it was just one article or TV appearance.

 

[NSWCROW]

Jesus , reckons the muslims deserved it in NZ and now he's crying about insulting a *en murderer.

Still the same mutt you were the day i blocked you lethal so well done on not improving yourself as a human in the meantime


* me some people.....

 

[Present Not Past]

I worry that we're going to be badgered into not even publicly acknowledging any motive or circumstance or other piece of salient information, because it is seen as somehow diminishing the wrongness of the act.

Do you have a precedent for that occurring or are you just hand wringing?

 

[Lethality]

Do you have a precedent for that occurring or are you just hand wringing?

In terms of ignoring facts out of consideration for one issue, possibly the transgender debate and inclusivity going so far that it disadvantages bio female athletes.

 

[Lethality]

Jesus , reckons the muslims deserved it in NZ and now he's crying about insulting a fu**en murderer.

I didn't say either of these things. Where's the quote about the NZ shooting?

Dropping the 'small dick' insult has nothing to do with defending Baxter, it's just the kind of insult we can do without . We're supposed to be dismantling toxic masculinity, part of that means not associating genitalia with manliness.

 

[NSWCROW]

I didn't say either of these things. Where's the quote about the NZ shooting?

Dropping the 'small dick' insult has nothing to do with defending Baxter, it's just the kind of insult we can do without . We're supposed to be dismantling toxic masculinity, part of that means not associating genitalia with manliness.

Yeah i just blocked you no reason after a comment in the NZ shooting thread

And you DID sook about the little dick comment , then you did again in the same post where you said you didn't



rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick
rowan baxter had a little dick

^^ just for you lethal

 

[Lethality]

Yeah i just blocked you no reason after a comment in the NZ shooting thread

That looks increasingly likely, given this recent display.

And you DID sook about the little dick comment , then you did again in the same post where you said you didn't

I'm not denying that I 'sooked' about the little dick comment. The point is it's not a defence of Baxter in any way. I object to it as a form of toxic masculinity.

 

[Present Not Past]

In terms of ignoring facts out of consideration for one issue, possibly the transgender debate and inclusivity going so far that it disadvantages bio female athletes.

I can see how those two issues are similar ...... not.

 

[Lethality]

I can see how those two issues are similar ...... not.

Well they're different subjects but it's similar in that we tend to ignore science sometimes when we feel strongly about something. The transgender thing is a possible example of that.

 

[NSWCROW]

That looks increasingly likely, given this recent display.



I'm not denying that I 'sooked' about the little dick comment. The point is it's not a defence of Baxter in any way. I object to it as a form of toxic masculinity.

Yeahnah i'm not in the habit of randomly blocking people.


Also , i'm gonna go on calling him that so you can make your own arrangements.

 

[Lethality]

Also , i'm gonna go on calling him that so you can make your own arrangements.

In my view you're part of the problem. You're promoting the same macho bullshit that Baxter probably believed in.

 

[Kurve]

I don't have an opinion on it myself.

Then why did you raise it?

 

[Lethality]

Then why did you raise it?

As a possible example of science denial.

 

[Present Not Past]

Well they're different subjects but it's similar in that we tend to ignore science sometimes when we feel strongly about something. The transgender thing is a possible example of that.

Can you explain how science and crime are similar. I'm trying to comprehend you're reasoning in this.

 

[Lethality]

Can you explain how science and crime are similar. I'm trying to comprehend you're reasoning in this.

The reasoning is that sometimes even salient facts become a taboo, in both.

 

[NSWCROW]

 

[Present Not Past]

The reasoning is that sometimes even salient facts become a taboo, in both.

Sure. My original question was do you have an example of that in the field of criminal investigations?

 

[Lethality]

Sure. My original question was do you have an example of that in the field of crime?

Maybe the #metoo thing, where for a time people jumped to conclusions, or Matt Damon got in trouble for differentiating between different levels of bad behaviour.