- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Posts
- 19,574
- Reaction score
- 78
- Location
- Celtic Utopia
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- The Boston ones.
- Banned
- #51
All you're doing each time you say it is highlighting your complete lack of knowledge.
Who would you take with a late pick that would be better to have on our list than McLean?
Who would you take with a late pick that has a better chance of succeeding than Mclean?
This is not the draft to be making poor trades like that, when we have no issues with our salary cap we don't need to make trades that will weaken our list.
You mean it's your opinion our list is better with him on.
At the price we're paying him I don't view it as such. Also I don't think he's made us a better team when he's got a game.
I'm happy ro take a punt on a kid at pick 60 that "might" play 200 games for us than a guy who has no hope in hell of even playing 50 for us the way he's going.
Losing BM doenst weaken our list so greatly as you seem to be suggesting given he's done sod all for us.
Given how none of us are privy to the clubs salary cap and how it's distributed I'm not sure how you can categorically state that having his wage off our books couldn't be useful. Maybe it is, maybe it isnt.
I just don't like paying decent money to a non contributor.









