Brodie Holland Woman Basher

LVAK

All Australian
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Posts
748
Likes
36
Location
East St.Kilda
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Richmond
#76
What? Loud minority? Get over it.
Loud minority. I don't even think you know what you're saying just regurgitating a Murdoch line that's been drummed into you.

I was making no personal comment regarding my views , just giving you the dynamics of popular thought. You are the one here revealing your myopic view
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

RememberMe

Club Legend
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Posts
1,538
Likes
0
Location
North WA
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
-
#77
Loud minority. I don't even think you know what you're saying just regurgitating a Murdoch line that's been drummed into you.

I was making no personal comment regarding my views , just giving you the dynamics of popular thought. You are the one here revealing your myopic view
Yes, keep telling yourself that.
 

Cassius_Clay

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 6, 2004
Posts
5,043
Likes
1,105
AFL Club
Collingwood
#78
LMFAO!!
Scotland slapped a girl.


Holland grabbed a girl, put her in a headlock, held her on the ground, punched her numerous times in the head, and made her head blead.

Let me see.... someone needs to go to anger management session and take his **** of a girlfriend with him.
Are you the ugly ho he hit?

You deserved it slapper.
 

Aristotel

Club Legend
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Posts
2,092
Likes
7
Location
X
AFL Club
Collingwood
#80
LMFAO!!
Scotland slapped a girl.


Holland grabbed a girl, put her in a headlock, held her on the ground, punched her numerous times in the head, and made her head blead.

Let me see.... someone needs to go to anger management session and take his **** of a girlfriend with him.
So you're saying that sometimes it's o.k to asault a woman?

Thanks for clearing that up.
 

jacko57

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 20, 2006
Posts
23,654
Likes
5,418
Location
melbourne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
#81
You can try and label me all you wan't. On the same level, however, I have a pretty clear image of you too. :) It's funny that the 'loud minority' are getting behind David Hicks. You're right though, he's an upstanding member of society. His kids must be so proud of him... Wait, hang on - no they're not! In fact Hicks will never see them again! It's just like you ignorant fools getting behind Schapelle Corby, because she was like innocent and stuff... :thumbsdown:
On the contrary, you're the fool. My view of Hicks is that he may be a terrorist, he may be a naive fool, or something in between. But the bogus trial over in Cuba did not prove he was guilty of anything. All that has been proved is that the Howard government would abandon the legal rights of an Australian citizen because it suited their political agenda, and they didn't want to offend their masters in the White house.
If Hicks did commit a crime, he should have been tried, and sentenced long ago. If he didn't actually commit a crime (ie, break a law that existed at the time of his actions), the Australian government should have stood up for his rights, just as the British government did for their citizens. It's bleeding obvious.........to everyone but you, Howard, Downer, Ruddock & Bolt. And (I'm guessing) Sam Newman.
 

twoforjoy

All Australian
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Posts
976
Likes
0
Location
on the Epping Line
AFL Club
Collingwood
#82
I can not believe that anyone is swallowing the government line on Hicks. He had no chance of a fair trial, he was called guilty and labelled a terrorist by Howard, Downer, Ruddock and members of the US govt and military before any evidence was ever presented. He was called an illegal combatant and stripped of his rights to a fair trial so they could set up a kangaroo court. He pleaded guilty because if he did not he would rot in jail for longer than if he contested his innocence under a prejuiducial system. He has been pressured to plead guilty. He will stay safely put away until after the federal election and then will go free.

Brodie Holland is tool. This is hardly an incoming newsflash.
 

Claude Balls

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Posts
5,180
Likes
3,269
AFL Club
Geelong
#83
I can not believe that anyone is swallowing the government line on Hicks. He had no chance of a fair trial, he was called guilty and labelled a terrorist by Howard, Downer, Ruddock and members of the US govt and military before any evidence was ever presented. He was called an illegal combatant and stripped of his rights to a fair trial so they could set up a kangaroo court. He pleaded guilty because if he did not he would rot in jail for longer than if he contested his innocence under a prejuiducial system. He has been pressured to plead guilty. He will stay safely put away until after the federal election and then will go free.

Brodie Holland is tool. This is hardly an incoming newsflash.
Good post. The people who don't quite understand what the issue actually is regarding David Hicks are nothing more than hicks themselves, and by and large seem to be those who think Brodie Holland's behaviour is acceptable:thumbsdown:
 

jacko57

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 20, 2006
Posts
23,654
Likes
5,418
Location
melbourne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
#84
I can not believe that anyone is swallowing the government line on Hicks. He had no chance of a fair trial, he was called guilty and labelled a terrorist by Howard, Downer, Ruddock and members of the US govt and military before any evidence was ever presented. He was called an illegal combatant and stripped of his rights to a fair trial so they could set up a kangaroo court. He pleaded guilty because if he did not he would rot in jail for longer than if he contested his innocence under a prejuiducial system. He has been pressured to plead guilty. He will stay safely put away until after the federal election and then will go free.

Brodie Holland is tool. This is hardly an incoming newsflash.
Correct. And correct.:thumbsu:
 

LuvMyHawks

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Posts
10,804
Likes
5,166
Location
Wimmera
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#85
How can anyone on here say that Hicks is innocent? He was CAUGHT fighting and Training with the Taliban, FGS!!!. He is a TRAITOR, and as such should be dealt with accordingly. I do agree he should have been charged with an offence much earlier, but he IS Guilty of being a traitor,
Just look at the other name he uses, MUHAMMAD DAWOOD, one of many Islamic names he uses. IF he didn't intend to become a terrorist AND a traitor, why would he change his name??? And why should we keep him here in a prison..Let him stay over there, he made a choice many years ago!!!..Send him to Afghanistan, or Iraq, he would love that!!!
 

jacko57

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 20, 2006
Posts
23,654
Likes
5,418
Location
melbourne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
#86
How can anyone on here say that Hicks is innocent? He was CAUGHT fighting and Training with the Taliban, FGS!!!. He is a TRAITOR, and as such should be dealt with accordingly. I do agree he should have been charged with an offence much earlier, but he IS Guilty of being a traitor,
Just look at the other name he uses, MUHAMMAD DAWOOD, one of many Islamic names he uses. IF he didn't intend to become a terrorist AND a traitor, why would he change his name??? And why should we keep him here in a prison..Let him stay over there, he made a choice many years ago!!!..Send him to Afghanistan, or Iraq, he would love that!!!
There is a difference between saying Hicks is innocent, and saying he has not been proved to be guilty of breaking any law. Sorry if that's too big a challenge for your brain cell to process.
That's one of the problems with this farce of a process : he may well be a terrorist, but they've thrown away any chance of getting a credible verdict, one way or the other.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

twoforjoy

All Australian
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Posts
976
Likes
0
Location
on the Epping Line
AFL Club
Collingwood
#87
At the time he was caught there was no law against what he was doing. Howard did not want to bring him to trial here because that would mean making a law against something that was not illegal when Hicks did it. But Howard is happy to let an Australian citizen be tried by similar retrospective legislation by the US military. (not the US justice system even) Hypocritical much? That makes Howard the traitor for selling out an Australian citizen.
 

stickman11

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Posts
5,382
Likes
175
Location
Littlefooty.com
AFL Club
Melbourne
#88
How can anyone on here say that Hicks is innocent? He was CAUGHT fighting and Training with the Taliban, FGS!!!. He is a TRAITOR, and as such should be dealt with accordingly. I do agree he should have been charged with an offence much earlier, but he IS Guilty of being a traitor,
!
He is Australian... he was fighting for the Taliban FGS!!! who weren't fight Australia. We helped the US invade... FGS!!!
 

jacko57

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 20, 2006
Posts
23,654
Likes
5,418
Location
melbourne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
#89
He is Australian... he was fighting for the Taliban FGS!!! who weren't fight Australia. We helped the US invade... FGS!!!
Yeah, I'm no fan of the Taliban, and can't understand why anyone would want to go & fight for them ; but they were the government of Afghanistan at the time Hicks went over there. Not sure how Hicks was supposed to predict that they would become 'the enemy'.
 

goalpie

Premiership Player
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Posts
4,734
Likes
15
Location
Up a crack
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Pink Sydney Swines
#90
LMFAO!!
Scotland slapped a girl.


Holland grabbed a girl, put her in a headlock, held her on the ground, punched her numerous times in the head, and made her head blead.

Let me see.... someone needs to go to anger management session and take his **** of a girlfriend with him.
Go away you stupid women.
 
Top Bottom