Bruce Francis has replied.

[Boxhead_31]

Bruce has finally delivered his mangum opus 103 pages of madness
http://twitdoc.com/view.asp?id=3552...raft-asat-9am-111115-2-.pdf&usr=TheGovernorSM

 

[Slartibartfast]

Bruce has finally delivered his mangum opus 103 pages of madness
http://twitdoc.com/view.asp?id=3552...raft-asat-9am-111115-2-.pdf&usr=TheGovernorSM

Think I might wait until someone posts the abridged version.

 

[Gavin Excell]

Puts the A back into Apologist

 

[Muggs]

Bruce has finally delivered his mangum opus 103 pages of madness
http://twitdoc.com/view.asp?id=3552...raft-asat-9am-111115-2-.pdf&usr=TheGovernorSM

That's from 2015.

I'm personally wondering why he's never posted the reply he received from the Ombudsman. He's sworn about them a few times as being corrupt... so guess he got a no...

 

[Swerving Irv]

His son was here too, and then one day we decided good riddance to bad trash.

Nice to see you too Doss. Checked the papers recently? Hope you're enjoying the keyboard life cobber. Love you!

 

[jenny61_99]

What a bizarre thread bump.

 

[Oscarman]

I thought Bruce must have put another missive out. Disappointing.

 

[Satan]

I blame too many coronas

 

[savagelunchbox]

Nice to see you too Doss. Checked the papers recently? Hope you're enjoying the keyboard life cobber. Love you!

How's Brucey doing, m8?

He went a bit Trumpy in the head. Hope he's had a bex and a lie down, and is talking to a professional about those delusional conspiracies that he was peddling. Didn't help that the Essendon mouth breathers were clinging onto his daft conspiracies as a last ditch hope of 'freeing' the druggies.

We were all worried for a little while there.

 

[blackshadow]

What a day folks, everybody's favourite crackpot is back adding to his 15000 hours of "research" and single finger typing with a letter to the new Essendon president.

 

[Satan]

What a day folks, everybody's favourite crackpot is back adding to his 15000 hours of "research" and single finger typing with a letter to the new Essendon president.

Not a Dan Fan either

 

[savagelunchbox]

Has all the warning signs of an avid Fox News watcher.

Surprised there was no mention of Hilary Clinton in that email.

 

[kane249]

This could be fun

 

[3rd Grade Maggy]

This bump got me as excited as when the Chrisco thread appears.

Dear Mr Brasher.

There are too many players. Please remove three. I am not a crackpot.

 

[citizen-erased]

there it is.
the focus on footy moment.

ahead of schedule too
#17 in 2021. nothing more assured

 

[citizen-erased]

This bump got me as excited as when the Chrisco thread appears.

Dear Mr Brasher.

There are too many players. Please remove three. I am not a crackpot.

Saad, Joey, Raz.

Done

 

[The 747]

What a day folks, everybody's favourite crackpot is back adding to his 15000 hours of "research" and single finger typing with a letter to the new Essendon president.

Woot, today is a great day!

 

[matthew_s]

Has all the warning signs of an avid Fox News watcher.

Surprised there was no mention of Hilary Clinton in that email.

Fairly sure Bruce typed this from the non-existant basement of a pizza shop.

 

[branedotorg]

Are decisions with written reasons published in full?

Many decisions with written reasons are published in full, but not all decisions.

The AAT must not publish information if its disclosure is prohibited or restricted by law. For example, published decisions in most child support cases and all cases about protection (refugee) visas must not include names or other details which may identify the applicant and some other people. The AAT can also direct in individual cases that information not be published. Decisions are prepared for publication to comply with these requirements.

If you are concerned about information that has been, or might be, published in a decision, you can apply to us not to publish some information or the entire decision. Write to us stating what you want kept confidential and why. If we are satisfied there is a good reason, the AAT can decide to:

• edit a decision to remove information
• not publish a decision, or
• recall a published decision.

health records act may mean we never get to read Danksie's submission but it's the christmas in february we all deserve

 

[matthew_s]

health records act may mean we never get to read Danksie's submission but it's the christmas in february we all deserve

As if Dank actually follows through in any meaningful way.

 

[branedotorg]

As if Dank actually follows through in any meaningful way.

How dare you suggest Bruce's star witness won't provide substantive evidence!

Allan Hird must be a game changer and this guy:

“The evidence of a stitch-up is compelling”

Bob O'Dea - Freedom of Information requests

www.righttoknow.org.au

Robert O'Dea - Freedom of Information requests

www.righttoknow.org.au

 

[Sir Hugh Percy]

Ahhh, this brings back memories. Great days.... great days.

 

[Moquo]

Are we getting the banned back together?

 

[kane249]

Are we getting the banned back together?

View attachment 983655

Time to get out the dumplings and sea kayaks

 

[Ancient Tiger]

As if Dank actually follows through in any meaningful way.

He's had 5 years to forge invoices and spreadsheets. Any decent crook would have impeccable records by now....