Bruce Francis has replied.

Remove this Banner Ad

Are there any Bombers supporters out there that think this might be a good thing?

On SM-A530F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Assuming you're talking about this:




It's done. Everyone moved on. Even with the sworn testimony, Dank has proven to be untrustworthy. He had all these years to assist and NOW he provides a sworn testimony years after careers were ruined and reputations damaged?

It won't amount to anything anyway and even if it does, we don't benefit from it.
 
Assuming you're talking about this:




It's done. Everyone moved on. Even with the sworn testimony, Dank has proven to be untrustworthy. He had all these years to assist and NOW he provides a sworn testimony years after careers were ruined and reputations damaged?

It won't amount to anything anyway and even if it does, we don't benefit from it.

Pages of Affidavits are working a treat for Rudi so Dank may as well give them a shot
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Dank has been bankrupted, shot at and charged with fraud since the ASADA fiasco.

The idea that an affidavit sworn by him, which presumably contains his ‘recollections’ only and doesn’t exhibit any of the documents he said would exonerate the players seven years ago, will have any bearing now is pure fantasy.

Whole thing was sad but even most Essendon supporters have moved on. Really wonder what possesses people like this after all these years.
 
New Essendon president Paul Brasher says the club won’t try and clear the names of players and staff who were caught up in the supplement saga, saying it would be “a distraction from our work on the field”.

Brasher has succeeded Lindsay Tanner as the Bombers president and in response to a question from a fan at Essendon’s virtual Annual General Meeting this week he said trying to change the outcome of the ASADA (now Sport Integrity Australia) investigation would not be in the club’s best interests.

“Members have heard me say before that our absolute focus is on winning games of football and putting this club in the best position to have on field success and not to have anything get in the way of that,” he said.

“We believe to revisit the ASADA decision to get involved in that again would be a distraction, it would be a distraction from our work on field and it’s something that we don’t intend to do.”

Stand by for a Bruce rant
 
Lawyers for the AFL and Australian Sports Anti-Doping Association have agreed to share their Essendon doping investigation correspondence with former Test cricketer Bruce Francis, who is seeking exoneration for the 34 Bombers players who were suspended for breaching the WADA code.

Will Bruce find the Kraken?
 
Lawyers for the AFL and Australian Sports Anti-Doping Association have agreed to share their Essendon doping investigation correspondence with former Test cricketer Bruce Francis, who is seeking exoneration for the 34 Bombers players who were suspended for breaching the WADA code.

Will Bruce find the Kraken?

Why on Earth would they give him this, it’ll just give him more air time
 
Still fighting
A secret document used to charge 34 Essendon players with anti-doping violations is being sought at a tribunal hearing on Monday.
Sport Integrity Australia is fighting the release of a key piece of evidence used to ban the Bombers players from the game and label them as drug cheats.

Campaigner Bruce Francis is taking the body to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Brisbane at 10am.
He is seeking the release of the “CEO Recommendation Show Cause Pack”.

It is understood that the AFL will give evidence supporting Sport Integrity Australia, the body that replaced the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, seeking to keep the document secret.

The AFL is expected to argue that releasing the document will compromise its relationship with the sport watchdog.

The CEO Recommendation Show Cause Pack was partly based on ASADA’s official briefing to the Anti-Doping Review Violation Panel.

That panel needed to sign off on any charges against players.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Still fighting
A secret document used to charge 34 Essendon players with anti-doping violations is being sought at a tribunal hearing on Monday.
Sport Integrity Australia is fighting the release of a key piece of evidence used to ban the Bombers players from the game and label them as drug cheats.

Campaigner Bruce Francis is taking the body to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Brisbane at 10am.
He is seeking the release of the “CEO Recommendation Show Cause Pack”.

It is understood that the AFL will give evidence supporting Sport Integrity Australia, the body that replaced the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, seeking to keep the document secret.

The AFL is expected to argue that releasing the document will compromise its relationship with the sport watchdog.

The CEO Recommendation Show Cause Pack was partly based on ASADA’s official briefing to the Anti-Doping Review Violation Panel.

That panel needed to sign off on any charges against players.
Campaigner lol
 
So why does Sport Integrity want to keep it a secret?
The most likely reason is that they are actually PROTECTING Essendon and also the AFL because it will show the latter knew a lot more than came out in the press. Essendon also would not want to go through this again just when some people had started to forget it and are looking to the future.
 
So why does Sport Integrity want to keep it a secret?
More than likely there are privacy issues for those involved.

Why should they give their information to some senile old busy body who's got nothing to do with the case?

.
 
More than likely there are privacy issues for those involved.

Why should they give their information to some senile old busy body who's got nothing to do with the case?

.
He played (a) test match for Australia. That's why!

Actually, he's just a senile old busy body who's got nothing to do with the case so bugger him.

The most likely reason is that they are actually PROTECTING Essendon and also the AFL because it will show the latter knew a lot more than came out in the press. Essendon also would not want to go through this again just when some people had started to forget it and are looking to the future.

It would be an absolute hoot if he did win his case and it turned out that the beans were fully spilled.

Political c.a.m.p.a.i.g.n.e.r aka a pudenda[sic] because the plural is much more mellifluous than the singular

I have missed your insightfulness AT and your very interesting ways of putting the doping issue into words BC.
 
The most likely reason is that they are actually PROTECTING Essendon and also the AFL because it will show the latter knew a lot more than came out in the press.
not quite

succour_moms[sic] and Australian fair-play sport mythos cannot be reconciled to pro-sport, pro-sport marketing , and youth sport pedagogy (versus youth sport pedagogy/mythos)
 
Last edited:

poor bruce.

im really surprised he hasnt fallen down a q-anon / covid rabbit hole.

just think of all the amazing research he could do.
 
giphy.gif
Poor Bruce will have a lot more one finger typing to do...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top