Bubkley should have won the 94 B+F @ Brisbane

[pies rule]

Just reading the topic about the Doggies, it refreshed my memory that Buckley should have won the 94 B+F at Brisbane but they tamperd with because they knew during the home and away season that he was going to leave. So basically they didn't want to give their B+F to a player that was not going to be there next season. I heard this yesterday. Can anybody else throw some light on to the situation?

 

[Olmy]

Yeah, but you can understand the Bears not wanting to award the 1994 B&F to a player who wasn't actually on their list at the time . . .

 

[JUBJUB]

That rumour has been around for years.I reckon its crap.
If they wanted any chance to keep him why didn't they give it to him ?

------------------
"Kick the bloody thing"

 

[carb70]

pies rule, In 1994 Buckley was a Collingwood player. I think you meant to say the 1993 Brisbane B&F. Anyway who did win the B&F at Brisbane in 1993?.

 

[pies rule]

Okay I f@#%d up. I ment to say 93. Any way I think it was Micheal Mclean (spelling). By the way I found out that this story was confirmed yesterday by an unknown caller on 3AW, claiming to be on the Bears commity at the time.

 

[AlfAndrews]

Originally posted by pies rule:
... By the way I found out that this story was confirmed yesterday by an unknown caller on 3AW, claiming to be on the Bears commity at the time ...

I'm glad you're very thorough with your research, mate. You've certainly chosen a very reliable source.

Have you thought of doing a Ph.D.?



------------------
**floreat pica**