- Jul 13, 2015
- 36,489
- 40,667
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I thought she left DJ's to win more premierships at Myers?
Bloody ripper.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought she left DJ's to win more premierships at Myers?
If the rumours of where his money has gone are true, that might not be the case.
I see Geelong are saving themselves for the big dance again this year?Your Geelong obsession is admirable.
Maybe you’ll get within 70 points of us this Easter Monday?
Enlighten me of these rumours or point me in the right direction?
I'm aware of that one but the "rumours" Abasi was alluding to seem to has something to do with his finances.
The rumour that he is rich?
Wouldn't have thought someone could be sacked because of their spouse's actions.
So that must be 3 strikes now then .
"Oh" .... he must be on his second set of 3 strikes..It was 3 strikes a few years ago, remember that finals series he missed?
"Oh" .... he must be on his thirty-second set of 3 strikes..
Apparently they changed the rules to give players a clean slate and wipe all strikes after 4 yrs .... well not apparently , that is fact .Apparently Buddy has, according to rumours anyway, been on a final strike for about 10 years now.
His entire career has been plagued by the rats and the filth of the internet besmirching his bad name on trumped up drug use accusations.
May he snort in peace.His entire career has been plagued by the rats and the filth of the internet besmirching his bad name on trumped up drug use accusations.
Oh!His entire career has been plagued by the rats and the filth of the internet besmirching his bad name on trumped up drug use accusations.
Really?Apparently they changed the rules to give players a clean slate and wipe all strikes after 4 yrs .... well not apparently , that is fact .
The timing of that change however was rather interesting .
You can banter but not slander...Does the word "defamation" mean anything to you? I'd delete this post ASAP if I were you unless;
1. You can prove what you have written
2. You can subpoena said premiership player who can prove what you have written, if indeed he is willing to even admit what you claim he has said to you
3. You are confident that you can subpoena documents supporting your assertions
The veil of Big Footy does not indemnify you from defamation law in Australia.
Really?
Wouldn't surprise me as the AFL isn't serious about drugs in sport.
Absolutely , it was changed awhile after the medical records of hawthorn players were found . Not saying that was the link but what may have happened after may well have been . Just joining the dots .
It is not something the obviously talk about on air but it has been discussed and confirmed a few times on the telly .
So with the self reporting and the clean slate you could essentially have 9 strikes and 3-4 self reports over a 12-15 yr career .
Then you also have the forced rest issue ( injury ) to protect players . It is pretty laughable but that is the AFL .
First of all, it was after the records were “found” that the media began attacking the afl for no drug policy. Joining the dots would be saying that those records were what encouraged the AFL to make the changes.Absolutely , it was changed awhile after the medical records of hawthorn players were found . Not saying that was the link but what may have happened after may well have been . Just joining the dots .
It is not something the obviously talk about on air but it has been discussed and confirmed a few times on the telly .
So with the self reporting and the clean slate you could essentially have 9 strikes and 3-4 self reports over a 12-15 yr career .
Then you also have the forced rest issue ( injury ) to protect players . It is pretty laughable but that is the AFL .
I think he's being geoblocked.How come Dank420 is quiet on Buddy related matters? Dank420 usually has good word coming out of the Swans.....