Bulldogs v West Coast - Rd 11, 2016

[DrEvil_]

Good game

 

[West Coast 06]

Well done Doggies. Best thing was that Masten and the Eags supporters thought they had it!

What do you call an Eagles player in Victoria? Owen

Have you spent ten weeks thinking that one up?

 

[AFDogs]

Just goes to show how much Morris flies under the radar, when they put Boyd's name and stats up during his interview.

 

[Substance]

Contested possessions 152 - 114

Absolutely smashed.

 

[Quinz]

Who was on kennedy? Bathed him. 3 kicks? wow

I'm blaming his new kid.

 

[peppy la pew]

Absolutely kissed on the dick. 3 goals in the first half assisted by the umps was the difference.

Hahahahaha, thanks plug

You had plenty of chances to win, but again fell short on the road

Mentally soft group of players

 

[demondavey]

Dogs just have too much polish and apply excellent midfield and defensive pressure. Foot skills are elite. The dogs can do some damage in September if they can hold their spot in top 4.

 

[Rod Stroker]

The team that can't win when it travels lost against the team that doesn't travel.

Sounds about right

Spot on. Can't put much weight on that win when they just got home by 9 points against a team who doesn't win in Vic.

Nevertheless, the splooge fest continues!

 

[peppy la pew]

I'm blaming his new kid.

Get on him for a bag next week

After some sleep

 

[wce_all_da_way]

Dogs were better today for most of the game and deserved the win. We just seem so soft around the ball sometimes, teams just bounce off and break our tackles with ease. Major problems there. Some very iffy and punishing calls that didn't make the job easy that caused some major frustration on my end. How the hell do you miss that push in the back in the first quarter or the unrealistic attempt by Stringer?

Personal peeve is constant mentions of the brave Doggies with Wood being out, then amazement at the Dogs forwards yet not a mention of McGovern being a late out. Hame is such a turd.

 

[BallaratBulldog]

Spot on. Can't put much weight on that win when they just got home by 9 points against a team who doesn't win in Vic.

Nevertheless, the splooge fest continues!

And the same Bigfooty posters are bitter!

 

[Igloo]

Spot on. Can't put much weight on that win when they just got home by 9 points against a team who doesn't win in Vic.

Nevertheless, the splooge fest continues!

I'm quite happy to keep winning while we have some important players sitting on the pine and playing some average footy. Bodes well for when they come back
Appreciate the concern.

 

[Rich01]

Absolutely kissed on the dick. 3 goals in the first half assisted by the umps was the difference.

Eagles had their chances, but couldn't kick well enough out of their back half in the last 4 minutes.
Can't blame the umps for bad kicking in the clutch.
Or their best forward been given a bath by a first year player.

Shame, I thought the intensity was there. Much improved.
Beaten by a better side.
Upside is you probably won't be playing at Etihad come September.

 

[Yippy Yi Yeo]

Better than a 40 point loss but disappointing when a couple of dodgy frees or non calls make the difference. Campbell's goal in the first after a clear push in the back and the stiff butler deliberate come to mind.

 

[WCE_phil]

Eagles had their chances, but couldn't kick well enough out of their back half in the last 4 minutes.
Can't blame the umps for bad kicking in the clutch.
Or their best forward been given a bath by a first year player.

Shame, I thought the intensity was there. Much improved.
Beaten by a better side.
Upside is you probably won't be playing at Etihad come September.

Oh we definitely had the chances to win but if you take out the 3 umpire assisted goals in the first half and the unrealistic attempt by stringer in the second half how do the scores line up?

 

[Chattanooga]

Stringer turned 720 in a tackle and still gets to play on? Another charity joke for the #freemorebulldogs

720??? Ha ha don't let the truth get in the way....

Anyway they never pay those as HTB - if the tackle doesn't ****** the player in any way shape or form, provided you dispose of it correctly it is play on.

 

[BarryMorgan]

Spot on. Can't put much weight on that win when they just got home by 9 points against a team who doesn't win in Vic.

Nevertheless, the splooge fest continues!

Seriously, what do Kangaroos fans have against the Dogs? Have I missed something?

 

[Smeg Head]

720??? Ha ha don't let the truth get in the way....

Anyway they never pay those as HTB - if the tackle doesn't ****** the player in any way shape or form, as long as you dispose of it correctly it is play on.

Well we know that is a rarity with the bulldogs too.

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Good win dogs, top 4 at the end of the year is very likely.

 

[Bulldog1954]

Lots of North fans seem pleased with our win

 

[ep2018]

west coast will beat the crows in perth next week and they will be contenders again

Pyke invented the 'weagles web' so theres a chance we'd drop the game as he'd know the weaknesses as well as the Crows being a decent team also.

If we lose tho it will be the only loss at home we'll have this yr.

 

[maddog37]

Pretty good game, fair result. Just find the Bulldogs such a hard team to like.

Pretty much how everyone else feels about your mob.

 

[Chattanooga]

720??? Ha ha don't let the truth get in the way....

Anyway they never pay those as HTB - if the tackle doesn't ****** the player in any way shape or form, provided you dispose of it correctly it is play on.

Wow, what a harsh old filter we have here?

Can I try 'impede' then?

 

[Bulldog1954]

Better than a 40 point loss but disappointing when a couple of dodgy frees or non calls make the difference. Campbell's goal in the first after a clear push in the back and the stiff butler deliberate come to mind.

Umps definitely the difference, the smashing in contested ball had nothing to do with the result.

 

[Rich01]

Oh we definitely had the chances to win but if you take out the 3 umpire assisted goals in the first half and the unrealistic attempt by stringer in the second half how do the scores line up?

Unfortunately games don't work like that - it's a very simplistic view.
If one of the frees wasn't paid, the play after that would have been different to the one that actually eventuated, and the outcome different.

Fact is when the game was on the line in the final five minutes, Nic Nat missed a mark he should have taken n the forward 50, Kennedy was invisible, LeCras missed a chance to get your team within a kick of winning and your players couldn't effectively kick the ball past centre.
Can't blame the umpires for any of that.