- Dec 8, 2007
- 4,708
- 8,827
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bulls
[/b]
Footy on a Tuesday now? Guess it had to happen.
Must be 27th then. I always thought 25th for some odd reason.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
[/b]
Footy on a Tuesday now? Guess it had to happen.
For those that rely on words on a screen to get a sense of the occasion, that was truly awesome. I still have goosebumps!!!
I wouldn't be surprised if he were. Would be surprised if it was anyone but Judd too. Given the likelyhood for Judd to attract possibly more than one tagger. Let Carrazzo, arguably the best ball winner in the team, be assigned to the tagger, and make Johnson have to choose between Judd and the bloke who's constantly near the pill.
With Judd at 80-85%, I don't mind him playing almost as a decoy so early in the year, if it means our other blokes get a stack of it.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I was interested to see Carazzo lay a perfect block releasing Judd in a pack.
Must be 27th then. I always thought 25th for some odd reason.....
In Eddies defence, I had a wuick chat with him after the game and he knows and willingly admits that he feels out of sorts. At least he has realised this and hopefully gets himself rightGame Day observations:
- Eddie Betts has been crap pre-season and more disturbingly, slow.
Krezuers tap work was sublime, i'd tip him to get 15 well directed tabs per game come start of the season next year. His disposal was quite good, and he was very versatile throughout the day.So while we know how well kreuzer did around the ground but how would he have done in terms of tapouts against the more seasoned ruckman? Would he have had 15 and were they well directed?
Also did he take many marks around the ground and was his disposal good?
Also I read on TC that Hartlett took 9 marks. Does this sound about right?
Krezuers tap work was sublime, i'd tip him to get 15 well directed tabs per game come start of the season next year. His disposal was quite good, and he was very versatile throughout the day.
Harts was taking marks left and right, it's a shame he only converted one though.
Honestly, I wouldn't play him at CHF, either on one of the Forward Flanks or leading long from the pocket, vacating the spot for someone like Fev. He kicked his only goal from 45 out on the boundary line with absolute ease, it makes sence to play him somewhere were we can utalise his kicking ability, aswell as still have CHF free for the taking.Great news. Thanks Eddie. Would you have Hartlett starting CHF round 1 then? I'd like to think so. Did he miss a couple of shots?
Also in terms of taps on the night would Kreuzer have broken even with Hudson and Street?
Honestly, I wouldn't play him at CHF, either on one of the Forward Flanks or leading long from the pocket, vacating the spot for someone like Fev. He kicked his only goal from 45 out on the boundary line with absolute ease, it makes sence to play him somewhere were we can utalise his kicking ability, aswell as still have CHF free for the taking.
I think the question refering to Kreuzer would be one you'd have to bring up with HBF or Gilly, one of the real close watchers.
CheersCool. Thanks again Eddie.
Don't take it the wrong way pal as everyone is entitled to an opinion,but I reckon footy smarts would be a long suit of Jakes.As has been mentioned earlier, we lined up today with a forward line reminiscent of Hawthorn's triangle. Fev playing the Franklin role, Hartlett as Roughead, Edwards as Boyle.
I can't see this working as I don't believe Edwards has the football smarts to be able to create enough space in the forward 50 for Fev, without being a passenger himself (see: Betts). Even so, it still requires someone with an ability to make the most of the rare opportunities that come their way (Boyle rarely gets more than 10 touches a game for the Hawks, but usually ends up with his 1 or 2 goals a game as a result of his man leaving to double team Franklin), and Edwards' kicking for goal both in the preseason and down at Preston hasn't been pretty.
If we're to adopt this model of a forward line, he'd need to either show enough to keep Brad Fisher out of the team, no small task in itself (although was a more than adequate substitution for him today), or be able to prove more handy a part of the triangle than Hartlett, given that Hartlett has a few more cm's on him, and the versatility to play down back, and perhaps pinch hit in the ruck.
He's not exceptionally crap by any standards, but the things he brings to the table, aren't as appealing to what the likes of Fisher, Hartlett and even Wiggins offer.
I'm with you, Edwards rotation around the forward line was great, and when we chucked him at FF at the start of the third I think it was, Fevola played from the Forward pocket. Call me crazy LondonCalling, but I think it should be more about Fevola creating space for Edwards, rather than vice versa. Fevola has the ability to take pack grabs, and he can deliver the ball forward aswell. Edwards just doesn't have that potential.Don't take it the wrong way pal as everyone is entitled to an opinion,but I reckon footy smarts would be a long suit of Jakes.
Fair enough if you don't rate him,but I just thought that was an odd reason.
I'm with you, Edwards rotation around the forward line was great, and when we chucked him at FF at the start of the third I think it was, Fevola played from the Forward pocket. Call me crazy LondonCalling, but I think it should be more about Fevola creating space for Edwards, rather than vice versa. Fevola has the ability to take pack grabs, and he can deliver the ball forward aswell. Edwards just doesn't have that potential.....
Exactly right, imagine what playing a small fella' who can drag his man all over the forward line at Full Forward and Fevola in the pocket would do to the minds of opposition teams defence! It also seems to workNot so sure. Edwards is a very good contested mark. And exceptionally fast on the lead. With Fev dragging 2-3 of the best defenders with him, both Edwards and Hartlett will have a massive opportunity. I like this KP forward mix.![]()
Exactly right, imagine what playing a small fella' who can drag his man all over the forward line at Full Forward and Fevola in the pocket would do to the minds of opposition teams defence! It also seems to work
You'd love to think so. Somehow, i can jump imagine Edwards playing at FF week after week.Jake has a bucket-load of natural talent, and seems incredibly determined this year. Even when things aren't going well for him, he stays focused and keeps at the one percenters and team oriented stuff. Fev seems to be helping his development as well.![]()