Remove this Banner Ad

Burgatron 2008 - Merged Threads

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Re: Burgatron's Phantom Draft Due Today

Oh I see now, I'm arguing with a kid, no mature person says that.
I believe 'How about a big cup of suck my baws' is a famous SweetLeftFoot quote:thumbsu:

BTW- you're wrong again.

Burgan changed his draft again, and this one is just about spot on for Melbourne needs. Seems he has recognised his original errors.

I will now be accepting apologies.
 
Re: Burgans Last Day Top 20

God that top 20 is insane. He's got balls or just has no brains. Rich at 11 is insanity...if the crows pass up on Rich for Trengove I'll shit nails in anger. Just think we are fine for talls and and sick of our obsession with taking talls with our first pick.
 
Re: Burgans Last Day Top 20

I'm sure Burgan knows his credibility is on the line. Remember, this is not and never has been his personal ranking of players, he's merely speculating on what will unfold given the talk within AFL recruiting circles.

I for one am glad that he's provided the updates this year because it demonstrates that a number of clubs are still finalizing their positions and he's picking up on their latest discussions and feeding this information to us, the supporters. Much more intrigue this way...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

ive got a feeling that hurley may slide right down the pecking list. not sure obviously but wouldnt surprise me if the dons took rich then 6-9 are yarren ziebell, vickery and sidebottom. this means adelaide will have to decide on hurley or trengove for their big man
 
But if we do end up getting Trengove then I'll be happy enough...just not over Rich! He aint a bad tall really. Just love the mids in this draft and we severely lack midfield grunt and depth.
 
Re: Burgatron's Phantom Draft Due Today

I believe 'How about a big cup of suck my baws' is a famous SweetLeftFoot quote:thumbsu:

Who? Oh that's right, he's the guy who tried to tell me that the majority of US people vote, and that Shannon Grant was better than Brad Johnson. Ahem. Even if another immature person does it, it doesn't make it any better, infact it makes it sadder that you're reading these people and copying them.

BTW- you're wrong again.

Burgan changed his draft again, and this one is just about spot on for Melbourne needs. Seems he has recognised his original errors.

I will now be accepting apologies.

Apologising for what? Burgan changed because of the Hill news, not you.
 
Re: Burgatron's Phantom Draft Due Today

Who? Oh that's right, he's the guy who tried to tell me that the majority of US people vote, and that Shannon Grant was better than Brad Johnson. Ahem. Even if another immature person does it, it doesn't make it any better, infact it makes it sadder that you're reading these people and copying them.



Apologising for what? Burgan changed because of the Hill news, not you.
He changed it twice, Einstein. First time because of the Hill news (even though he changed Melbourne's picks which could have remained the same) and today he changed it again.

Has us taking Watts, Blease and Schoenmakers which would be a top draft for us. 2 KPP forwards and a fast outside mid.
 
Re: Burgatron's Phantom Draft Due Today

He changed it twice, Einstein. First time because of the Hill news (even though he changed Melbourne's picks which could have remained the same) and today he changed it again.

Has us taking Watts, Blease and Schoenmakers which would be a top draft for us. 2 KPP forwards and a fast outside mid.

So you're assuming he did, but don't actually know that, and have no hard evidence to prove that? Okay then, just making that clear.
 
Re: Burgatron's Phantom Draft Due Today

So you're assuming he did, but don't actually know that, and have no hard evidence to prove that? Okay then, just making that clear.
You said he changed it because of the Hill news.

The Hill news did not affect Melbournes picks at all. Yet he changed them anyway.

Then he changed them AGAIN 24 hours later.

You're embarrassing yourself.
 
Re: Burgatron's Phantom Draft Due Today

You said he changed it because of the Hill news.

The Hill news did not affect Melbournes picks at all. Yet he changed them anyway.

Then he changed them AGAIN 24 hours later.

You're embarrassing yourself.

And so he's not allowed to change his mind? Sheesh. Do you have any factual evidence, like an admission that he did it for the dees?

If not, fail. I don't go by hearsay logic, I go by evidence. No evidence, sorry.

EDIT: Lynch went high at 13, obviously the experts rate him...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top