Pinto_09
Debutant
Scribe
Don't take the bait mate.
Your appointed to do this job - as long as your comfortable with the result then thats all that counts.
Sure, listen to expected critics about certain players but don't go down the path of restructuring how it is done just because they think someone else can do a better job or the process is wrong.
Its not the AFL for crying out loud
Any poster that thinks the selector needs to see every game, every team etc etc are w*nking themselves
I'm on Scribe's side fool. I think he's done a fine job and i think selecting a team (right or wrong) is always good fun and brings some healthy debate. I was just adding that not too much should be read into it (as most have already agreed) due to the fact that he doesn't actually watch any games. He's pretty much just gone on the umpires votes which is a very risky option. God knows those C grade umpires aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.
And scribe, i don't know what sort of panel would/could be chosen but if they were i doubt they would ask to be compensated. Two meetings, one at half way and one at the end, wouldn't be too much time to give up for those passionate enough. However, selecting who should go on this panel is a completely different story. I've got no idea and i think until every C grade ammo game is televised there will never be an appriopriate person, or people, to select this side.
Still good fun to do though and well done to the blokes that made. It sure gives him some bragging rights.
P.S. I saw Dukes on 3 occasions and thought he was average at best. On what i saw he shouldn't have made the side. He's a shadow (not literally) of what he was in his VFL days.





