Moo
Premium Platinum
If he has speed why does he look so slow?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he has speed why does he look so slow?
You haven't seen that documentary The Matrix?If he has speed why does he look so slow?
So you are the only person to admit your are fence sitting. I am the only Pro Kersten person on here, the rest of you are anti kersten or don't give a stuff.It is tough to judge any of our forwards for the 2017-this year. The delivery into the 50 is horrendous. Last year was just a write off, so I do not read to much into it. We had a lot of entries into our 50 on the weekend early in the game, however again the game plan seemed to be to rush a bomb into the 50. If we do this, then Kersten has no role in this team.
On the other hand, if we are going to be more patient and hit a target inside 50 with a 15-20m kick to a lead, then yeah he could have a role. But from what I saw on the weekend, we need small forwards surrounding this contest - and for ffs get someone goal side, if nothing else to halve the rebounding opportunity.
Also if Kersten can be a link a player by leading maybe, but I have not seen it. He understandably had a better 2016 than 2017. So I guess the only way Kersten gets a guernsey is to take 6 marks a game at a minimum, have the occasional 10 mark game, but 3 is simply not acceptable for a KPP. This is something he has always struggled with, but if he can't do that as a KPP then he needs to go back to WAFL.
At 25, he has time, but he needs to start this year. He has had the occasional good game, so I am happy to persevere in the short term, and given Port dominated us, I am also writing off the Essendon game, as I think our skills and decisions were woeful. Cam Mac did impress with his work rate - if I see the work rate, then I am more supportive of a game that is nothing special. Kersten seems like a bit of floater, I do not notice him much as he is not really an impact player.
Not sure if that makes sense, but it appears I am on the fence.
He can be a handy 30-35 goal a year player for sure. He was one of two dockers to have multiple shots on Saturday. That’s how dire the game was. People writing him off are premature delistanators.So you are the only person to admit your are fence sitting. I am the only Pro Kersten person on here, the rest of you are anti kersten or don't give a stuff.
Now... heres how I see it. I am realistic. He will average 9-10 disposals a game. Does he need to average 6 marks a game? I don't know. Kerstens form can vary. He can have a 12 disposal game and kick 3-4 goals. He could have a 5 possession game and be scoreless.
I think the problem is more that he doesn't offer a lot else. Most 3rd string forwards are either pretty good goal kickers, get a lot of the ball on the lead or apply good tackle pressure.He can be a handy 30-35 goal a year player for sure. He was one of two dockers to have multiple shots on Saturday. That’s how dire the game was. People writing him off are premature delistanators.
He’s done the work over preseason and is as fit as he’s ever been. Hope he gets a solid 4-5 games to show what he’s got. Lots of third string forwards have goalless games.
Yeah - hence give him 4-5 games to show any improvement. He’s worked his backside off all preseason, done something different, so why not see if he can deliver some different results?I think the problem is more that he doesn't offer a lot else. Most 3rd string forwards are either pretty good goal kickers, get a lot of the ball on the lead or apply good tackle pressure.
At his best, Kersten has only really shown to be a decent goal kicker, and when he's not at his best ... there's not a lot he offers.
I'm actually not against playing Kersten, sorry I should have been clearer. My response was more too the comment that lots of 3rd string forwards go goalless sometimes.Yeah - hence give him 4-5 games to show any improvement. He’s worked his backside off all preseason, done something different, so why not see if he can deliver some different results?
If no improvement, drop him for Apeness or Dixon or Bennell or whoever once they are ready. It’s not going to stifle anyone’s development by leaving him in for a few games but will give a clearer indication if he can cut it at AFL - especially after the preseason he’s had.
It seems he will get games regardless. Tabs will probably get the same due to our lack of choices. But If both can kick 30 each, then that is a lot for freo.He can be a handy 30-35 goal a year player for sure. He was one of two dockers to have multiple shots on Saturday. That’s how dire the game was. People writing him off are premature delistanators.
He’s done the work over preseason and is as fit as he’s ever been. Hope he gets a solid 4-5 games to show what he’s got. Lots of third string forwards have goalless games.
I think we need a defender that releases Blakeley midfield, which allows Fyfe/Mundy to roll forward, which has ramifications for our forward line.I'm actually not against playing Kersten, sorry I should have been clearer. My response was more too the comment that lots of 3rd string forwards go goalless sometimes.
From my perspective at the moment, whether Kersten plays is more dependent on if they want to push Fyfe/Mundy forward more or play a second ruck.
If they play a second ruck, Tabs and McCarthy round out the forward line.
If we can afford Fyfe to go forward more, he does so in Kersten's place and we bring in a mid.
My opinion at the moment, is we need Fyfe in the midfield, Darcy hasn't quite shown enough as a forward for Peel, Dixon needs time and Ape needs a few games under his belt ... so Kersten plays and hopefully hits form.
Its going to take a while before we have a settled forward line and a well run midfield.I think we need a defender that releases Blakeley midfield, which allows Fyfe/Mundy to roll forward, which has ramifications for our forward line.
Long term the tall forwards are Dixon, Taberner/Cox/ruck-forward, McCarthy/Kersten.
So he is dropped and will play at Peel. He is going to be given a shot in the back 6The club has done the right thing with Kersten by getting him to work on his fitness base and then provide greater opportunities to be involved. But he needs to show progress. If not then he is fringe or depth (or gone).
Surely Cox is preferred in the backline?With Logue out indefinitely, Hughes in average form and MJ on the wane you’d have to assume he’ll be getting another opportunity for the seniors very soon.
Surely Cox is preferred in the backline?
I think both would play the 3rd tall in defence and taking MJ's place, it's a question of match ups.Different role I think Gav. From today's team Cox would more replace Hamling or AP whereas Kerstin would be a replacement for Jonno.
Logue is sadly injured and might be done for the year sadly.Even if he makes it as a defender he will be competing with Wilson, Ryan and 2 first rounders in Logue and hopefully Carter. Hard to see a spot for him unless Logue has ongoing issues.
I have to say that it seems a good experiment to have him in the backline. It may not be successful, and it may not be a permanent move, but he has managed to get himself back in the team for now which is a pretty good start.Logue is sadly injured and might be done for the year sadly.
Kersten had a good game vs the crows in the backline.
I have to say that it seems a good experiment to have him in the backline. It may not be successful, and it may not be a permanent move, but he has managed to get himself back in the team for now which is a pretty good start.
I have to say that it seems a good experiment to have him in the backline. It may not be successful, and it may not be a permanent move, but he has managed to get himself back in the team for now which is a pretty good start.