- Mar 28, 2010
- 5,342
- 6,038
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Miami HEAT
"Offsite black ops injection, harming unborn babies and drug smuggling from a Mexican drug cartel saga."
Check out that hard term
Check out that hard term
Can we now stop calling it the "Supplements saga"?
- Thread starter Reg Grundy35
- Start date
- Tagged users None
What a strange metric.
You finished last and your reputation, here and globally, is significantly worse than Carlton's ever was. Even with all these players back, your team was not even good to begin with.
You forgot the asterisk for the 16, one of those was won in a year that Essenon was convicted of cheating and another was won in a round robin where Essendon lost both it's finals against Richmond, any other year you would not have even contested for the flag.
Are you serious
PED
Performance Enhancing Drug
Supplements!
Rack Watts
Here's MASON
I have a PES dispenser.
Rack Watts
Here's MASON
Even if it were the case, we'd still be ahead.
Don't be too mad.
Rack Watts
Here's MASON
You'd hope so, people have been complaining about Essendon being in the media non-stop, but the moment it has the ability to stop completely, people keep bringing it up. Don't worry, it will pop up again the moment we make finals in 2017, "Essendon benefited from 2016" etc.
Rance2Mewtwo
Cancelled
- Jul 31, 2016
- 1,554
- 4,909
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Every time a legitimate point is made on here, how come Essendon supporters divert the topic into a baiting game and redirect the conversation so nobody actually talks about the real topic?
One reporter on twitter said he uses 'supplements saga' simply because it is shorter.
He reports facts incorrectly due to the use of easier language, if you take him at his word.
Clearly, the AFL media have been told to avoid words such as 'performance-enhancing', 'drugs', 'experimental', etc.
It's blatantly unethical for the AFL media to coordinate their manipulation of public perception through significantly downplaying something as serious as performance enhancing drugs.
Call it the PEDS saga, for short.
One reporter on twitter said he uses 'supplements saga' simply because it is shorter.
He reports facts incorrectly due to the use of easier language, if you take him at his word.
Clearly, the AFL media have been told to avoid words such as 'performance-enhancing', 'drugs', 'experimental', etc.
It's blatantly unethical for the AFL media to coordinate their manipulation of public perception through significantly downplaying something as serious as performance enhancing drugs.
Call it the PEDS saga, for short.
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
Over his dead body.
Supplemented Danks income
But, but what will they do with their lives??
Says 16 in the books doesn't it? Bad luck champ you keep fighting though ok
Just stating some facts, 14 GF wins, plus 2 round robins and one flag tainted by cheating, lots of asterisks there, like it or notSays 16 in the books doesn't it? Bad luck champ you keep fighting though ok
Good on ya. Fact is it says 16 in the book.Just stating some facts, 14 GF wins, plus 2 round robins and one flag tainted by cheating, lots of asterisks there, like it or not
Fact is the records show that the EFC implemented a club sanctioned doping program so you must agree that the "supplement saga" should now and forever more be referred to as the "club sanctioned doping program"
Lol different topic. Caring about what you want to call this past saga? Zero.Fact is the records show that the EFC implemented a club sanctioned doping program so you must agree that the "supplement saga" should now and forever more be referred to as the "club sanctioned doping program"
There is another book that mentions 666, I assumed that was Hirdy's number, still the books about AFL have Essendon on 14 Grand Final victories and 2 round robins, so yes 16 flags but with asterisks.
Wish i could do multiple likes to this post
no one ever had to call it the supplements saga #alliterationz
everyone who called it a supplements saga was in thrall to ian hanke (take a look at his jpeg) and liz lukin and she is only good for her tuna fishing weightlifter brother...
CJC and other SARMs drugs, selective androgen receptor modulators, made Bolt run 9.5, when previous epochs of sprinters, tall sprinters could not accelerate from the blocks because their levers were a disadvantage. And Yohan Blake was threatening Bolt before the establishment and institutions started cracking down on his competition, making their doping, a doping done with one hand tied behind their back. Disadvantaged in doping.
They are better than the Russian roids, and Soviet era where the female GDR athletes WRs still stand in the record books.
every post is Poe's law but this post is Poe's law and serious a manifest paradox.
RussellEbertHandball
everyone who called it a supplements saga was in thrall to ian hanke (take a look at his jpeg) and liz lukin and she is only good for her tuna fishing weightlifter brother...
CJC and other SARMs drugs, selective androgen receptor modulators, made Bolt run 9.5, when previous epochs of sprinters, tall sprinters could not accelerate from the blocks because their levers were a disadvantage. And Yohan Blake was threatening Bolt before the establishment and institutions started cracking down on his competition, making their doping, a doping done with one hand tied behind their back. Disadvantaged in doping.
They are better than the Russian roids, and Soviet era where the female GDR athletes WRs still stand in the record books.
every post is Poe's law but this post is Poe's law and serious a manifest paradox.
RussellEbertHandball
Last edited:
