- Jul 5, 2013
- 3,332
- 4,824
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Golovkin looked like he could've gone another 12 rounds.
As someone who's only recently started watching boxing, is it worth continuing watching with judges like Adalaide? It was a great fight, but that really took the shine off it.
I'd always assumed the talk about boxing being rigged/corrupt was an overplayed trope but that 118-110 makes it seem realistic suddenly.You'll still get to see some great fights most of the time. It's typically the high profile fights that attract a lot of controversy.
Sometimes I also wonder whether it's all worth following. You either get complete mismatches with one boxer absolutely destroying another for 12 or however many rounds, or you'll get great contests, with a clear winner, ruined by the result like we did today.
It was a draw so one of them will have the result advantage.Rigged.
More money in it for a rematch though, they'll square it up at 1 all.
Ahh, so 6 each. Wow.It was a draw so one of them will have the result advantage.
Wow. Just watched on utube.. I don't mind the draw. That was too close for me to give it to either fighter.
Absolute brutes!
The draw isn't the big issue. The big issue is that a judge could somehow was the same fight as everyone else and score it 118-110 Canelo.
I hope Adelaide Byrd dies. I hate people like that ruining s**t for millions of people.
That is why I watch 1/10th of the boxing I used to. That was a clear cut victory. There's no two ways about it. It was a clear GGG win. 8-4 at best.
It was ******* one sided.
See the thing is, most people can see the draw perspective, but Canelo winning 10 rounds? * off. An absolute tragedy. Even Canelo said he only won 7-8 rounds.Great fight, I watched it again last night on the tube. Not angry at the draw after watching it the second time