- Joined
- May 29, 2011
- Posts
- 30,433
- Reaction score
- 49,041
- Location
- SA
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt
Dangerfield is the club's best player. Important, but subtle, difference.
Each day you keep defending Van Berlo, you look more and more stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Dangerfield is the club's best player. Important, but subtle, difference.
VB, has proven he is a leader in on the track, preseason year in, year out.
Dangerfield has shown on-field leadership for a long period and I believe he is ready to take over the reins.
Let's be serious here. The clearly intended implication of what you said is that VB is only a leader on the track and not on the field. And that's not something you have any kind of proof for.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
disagree. You only have to watch a game, any game to realise he has no presence at all on the field. Never does anything your captain should when its needed. Boak v VanBerlo is a no contest IMO. He's not alone today though. Our senior players are the reason we lost today. They embarrased themselves and the jumper in that last 5 mins.Let's be serious here. The clearly intended implication of what you said is that VB is only a leader on the track and not on the field. And that's not something you have any kind of proof for.
No, Mitchell is actually a gun.
You are entitled to your belief. I believe you're wrong, but each to their own.I believe he is the best leader.
VB is a proven leader on the track. He is also a proven leader on the ground.VB, has proven he is a leader in on the track, preseason year in, year out.
Dangerfield has shown on-field leadership for a long period and I believe he is ready to take over the reins.
That proves your first assertion. It is 100% completely and utterly irrelevant to your second assertion.The proof is in the preseason runs. He leads them.
At being shitVB is a proven leader on the track. He is also a proven leader on the ground.
VB has had the most luck of any footballer on our list. Cannot do anything but run and will rack up 200plus games. Has no awareness , lateral movement and skills in traffic are awful and always have been. HE IS ONE OF THE LARGEST REASOND WE OFTEN GET KILLED IN THE MIDDLE.He cannot read the ball and just follows the man which means his man normally gets his hands to ball first and clears itEach day you keep defending Van Berlo, you look more and more stupid.
That proves your first assertion. It is 100% completely and utterly irrelevant to your second assertion.
VB is a proven leader on the track. He is also a proven leader on the ground.
Explain how your assertion that he's good on the track (which he is) says anything at all about his on-field leadership? Anything at all. You made 2 assertions - one that he's a good off-field leader (which has never been in dispute) and one that he is a poor on-field leader. Making an assertion about the first does not address the 2nd.Yes, father. You're always right.
Explain how your assertion that he's good on the track (which he is) says anything at all about his on-field leadership? Anything at all. You made 2 assertions - one that he's a good off-field leader (which has never been in dispute) and one that he is a poor on-field leader. Making an assertion about the first does not address the 2nd.
Come on.. you made a statement and have failed to back it up. Here's your original statement:It doesn't matter what I say, your opinion will always be right. So leave it at that. Your behaviour is borderline antagonistic.
cmndstab challenged your lack of logic as follows:VB, has proven he is a leader in on the track, preseason year in, year out.
Dangerfield has shown on-field leadership for a long period and I believe he is ready to take over the reins.
To which you responded with the following:Let's be serious here. The clearly intended implication of what you said is that VB is only a leader on the track and not on the field. And that's not something you have any kind of proof for.
This is an epic failure of logic. Stating that he leads the preseason runs addresses your first statement - that he is an excellent leader on the track (which has never been contested). Please explain how it addresses his on-field performances. There is no logical connection - none.The proof is in the preseason runs. He leads them.
Epic failure of logic? How about explaining:Come on.. you made a statement and have failed to back it up. Here's your original statement:
cmndstab challenged your lack of logic as follows:
To which you responded with the following:
This is an epic failure of logic. Stating that he leads the preseason runs addresses your first statement - that he is an excellent leader on the track (which has never been contested). Please explain how it addresses his on-field performances. There is no logical connection - none.
VB is a proven leader on the track.
He is also a proven leader on the ground.