- Banned
- #1
I started this new thread because I believe it differs from whether or not the number 5 guernsey should be retired/ reintroduced.
I personally believe that no number should be worn by the captain all the time e.g. what is happening at Richmond being captain is a great enough honour without having to wear a special number.
I am particularly against No. 5 being worn by the captain because it would be after Polly Farmer (who never captained Geelong) and Gary Ablett (who was joint captain for 1? season - correct me if im wrong). Neither were great captains and didnt make their fame as captains nor does anyone remember them as captains. They are legends of the game not legendary captains so to make captains wear number 5 would be disrespectul to all other captains that have worn the blue and white hoops.
I personally believe that no number should be worn by the captain all the time e.g. what is happening at Richmond being captain is a great enough honour without having to wear a special number.
I am particularly against No. 5 being worn by the captain because it would be after Polly Farmer (who never captained Geelong) and Gary Ablett (who was joint captain for 1? season - correct me if im wrong). Neither were great captains and didnt make their fame as captains nor does anyone remember them as captains. They are legends of the game not legendary captains so to make captains wear number 5 would be disrespectul to all other captains that have worn the blue and white hoops.





