Captains Captains Thread

[Corby_4]

VC can f*ck off this week.
Wacking it on Kelly for the last game of the weekend.

 

[DustyTiggers]

VC can f*ck off this week.
Wacking it on Kelly for the last game of the weekend.

Id go Lloyd for VC this week - too soon?

 

[Beau_Waters for PM]

Mitchell playing the Bulldogs this week.

I might loophole Franklin for lols, would need to be 140+ for me to take his score.

 

[_Cayz_]

Mitchell playing the Bulldogs this week.

I might loophole Franklin for lols, would need to be 140+ for me to take his score.

I loopholed Franklin on Thursday.and ended up with stitch haha.

 

[Corby_4]

Id go Lloyd for VC this week - too soon?

Haha nah it's not the end of the world.
Will however loophole Narkle for a 22 spot this week if he scores well again.

 

[samFFC]

Mitchell playing the Bulldogs this week.

I might loophole Franklin for lols, would need to be 140+ for me to take his score.

Great choice.
I'll take GAJ if I pick him up. Will keep 125+.

Don't forget everyone, although you may have missed out on 70 points by taking Lloyd or similar this week, you would have lost points the week before with Titch, or he could (god forbid) get an injury like Treloar or Fyfe. Pick a number and stick to it IMO. For me that would be 125. May be higher for other people!

 

[samFFC]

Similar to many I guess! Used the loophole early, and avoided two of Tom's low games by (a) predicting a worse score (r5) and (b) having Macrae in time.

R1: Simpson (loophole) 129
R2: Jacobs (loophole) 120
R3: Mitchell 148
R4: Mitchell 83
R5: Coniglio 112
R6: Mitchell 147
R7: Mitchell 119
R8: Macrae 155
R9: Macrae 144

Average 128.6.

R10: Macrae 113
R11: Mitchell 145
R12: Gawn 83
R13: Mitchell 120
R14: Mitchell 84
R15: Gawn 135

So 3 scores under 112 (but all in the 80s) and 5 scores over 140.

Average: 122.5.

 

[SM]

Danger goes big on the Swans usually I think? We struggle to match up on him, so could be tempting. I might stick with Lloyd though, the bastard. Think I'd need a 160 out of him.

 

[samFFC]

Danger goes big on the Swans usually I think? We struggle to match up on him, so could be tempting. I might stick with Lloyd though, the bastard. Think I'd need a 160 out of him.

I would definitely trust Lloyd over Dangerfield!

 

[Dupogi]

Lloyd only one for me, why not free hit!

 

[atlas1]

Gawn v Freo without Sandi?

 

[Joao]

Gawn v Freo without Sandi?

Yes, especially if it is Jones in and not Darcy. I expect 140 out of Gawn this week, possibly 150.

Danger over Parker flying the flag for me tonight. Not sure who's 90-105 score I'd take

 

[Alvin Purple]

Gawn v Freo without Sandi?

Martin scored 110 against Freo (Apeness) last week but Apeness went almost solo ruck because Sandilands was a late out.
He started fairly well but faded late.
I'm fairly sure Darcy (our second best Ruckman) will come in and so between the 2 of them I think will go ok but I suppose Gawn is a chance, not one that I will be taking that's for sure.

I went with Lloyds 125 last week I will be putting the VC on him again but he would need 150+ for me to take the C of Mitchell.

 

[Corby_4]

160+ to take the C of Titch this week.
Ball's in your court Lloydy.

 

[Joao]

Martin scored 110 against Freo (Apeness) last week but Apeness went almost solo ruck because Sandilands was a late out.
He started fairly well but faded late.
I'm fairly sure Darcy (our second best Ruckman) will come in and so between the 2 of them I think will go ok but I suppose Gawn is a chance, not one that I will be taking that's for sure.

I went with Lloyds 125 last week I will be putting the VC on him again but he would need 150+ for me to take the C of Mitchell.

It is Darcy but he is off a PCL and only two WAFL games. He will be rusty and Gawn will give him a bath IMO. If Sean had AFL form it would be different.

 

[_Cayz_]

Danger or Franklin as VC?

 

[samFFC]

Danger or Franklin as VC?

Buddy more likely to go 150 right?

 

[_Cayz_]

Buddy more likely to go 150 right?

That's my thoughts. When he is on he is on.

 

[DustyTiggers]

Danger or Franklin as VC?

Got the same question - going Buddy for his ceiling. Haven't trusted Danger yet. Which means he will go 140. But hey I figure we get in Franklin for his smashing scores as well as his sh*t scores, so hoping its the later tonight. Heard somewhere Geelong has the best defense though which is a sh*t but it is Buddy nonetheless. And hes coming off a massive 60 odd so he has form.

 

[samFFC]

Got the same question - going Buddy for his ceiling. Haven't trusted Danger yet. Which means he will go 140. But hey I figure we get in Franklin for his smashing scores as well as his sh*t scores, so hoping its the later tonight. Heard somewhere Geelong has the best defense though which is a sh*t but it is Buddy nonetheless. And hes coming off a massive 60 odd so he has form.

Good call

 

[DustyTiggers]

Good call

Just missed 140

 

[atlas1]

Yes, especially if it is Jones in and not Darcy. I expect 140 out of Gawn this week, possibly 150.

Danger over Parker flying the flag for me tonight. Not sure who's 90-105 score I'd take

Martin scored 110 against Freo (Apeness) last week but Apeness went almost solo ruck because Sandilands was a late out.
He started fairly well but faded late.
I'm fairly sure Darcy (our second best Ruckman) will come in and so between the 2 of them I think will go ok but I suppose Gawn is a chance, not one that I will be taking that's for sure.

I went with Lloyds 125 last week I will be putting the VC on him again but he would need 150+ for me to take the C of Mitchell.

Thanks. Will be sticking with the pig

 

[TheRednWhite]

Another 180 please Titchell. Last week was hell watching him rack it up and not having the C on him. Don’t ever want to experience that nonsense again. Please have pity on those that didn’t C you last week because of the stupid VC loophole!! Give us another 180 pig

 

[SloaneysDanger]

I am worried now...

"Western Bulldogs: "We’ll do our best to limit Tom's impact on the game, & that might be through more than one mechanism" Luke Beveridge on Tom Mitchell"

 

[Beau_Waters for PM]

I am worried now...

"Western Bulldogs: "We’ll do our best to limit Tom's impact on the game, & that might be through more than one mechanism" Luke Beveridge on Tom Mitchell"

That's what Buckley said a few weeks ago.. look how that turned out. Of course if media will naturally ask the question "what will you do to stop Tom Mitchell after his 50-possession game last week?", and coaches feel obliged to talk tough. Can't see a genuine tagger in the Dogs team who can run with Mitchell though.