Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I like Danger too but not sure about a Friday night captain.Danger on my radar this week...
loves the attention does the DangerI like Danger too but not sure about a Friday night captain.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That's a good point. I really feel like Danger should be the one this weekend.with Martin out... does that make any difference for the rocky captainers?
Tore up the bulldogs last time, who have been ravaged by injury and so should make it easier. Friday night scares me though, like you said. Archie Smith vs Jack Trengove battle of the ruck spuds in the Rocky game. Don't think Stef out will effect Rocky too much though, even without first use of the ball he will still get plenty of points through tackles. Both should go 130. Flip of a coin for me really, a frustrating flip thoughThat's a good point. I really feel like Danger should be the one this weekend.
It's tough. Rocky comes with that injury risk too. Saying that though, his average in recent times at the Gabba is absolutely ridiculous. Discounting injured games his last five there have been 128, 135, 142, 132 and 149. That is ****ed haha.Tore up the bulldogs last time, who have been ravaged by injury and so should make it easier. Friday night scares me though, like you said. Archie Smith vs Jack Trengove battle of the ruck spuds in the Rocky game. Don't think Stef out will effect Rocky too much though, even without first use of the ball he will still get plenty of points through tackles. Both should go 130. Flip of a coin for me really, a frustrating flip though
It'd be pretty ballsy to take it off a bloke coming off 179 lol.It's tough. Rocky comes with that injury risk too. Saying that though, his average in recent times at the Gabba is absolutely ridiculous. Discounting injured games his last five there have been 128, 135, 142, 132 and 149. That is stuffed haha.
I suppose rankings wise everyone else will keep him captain, or change to him as captain after last week. If he has a mare or gets injured everyone will be in the same boat.It'd be pretty ballsy to take it off a bloke coming off 179 lol.
every single player in the league comes with an injury risk when you think about itI suppose rankings wise everyone else will keep him captain, or change to him as captain after last week. If he has a mare or gets injured everyone will be in the same boat.
Except for Kade Simpson hahaevery single player in the league comes with an injury risk when you think about it
The bloke above you didn't do any better. I might have gone with Rocky but being a Port supporter I know his record against us doesn't include monster scores. In 8 games he has only two 120+ games. Geelong is playing the Bombers, going back onto Danger should be a safe bet.Why oh why did I pick rocky? I told myself it was better to stick with Mr consistent (danger) and I somehow got swayed![]()
Danger will be locked for the rest of the season, barring injury. Good run coming up. Should cash in big time against the Bobmers.The bloke above you didn't do any better. I might have gone with Rocky but being a Port supporter I know his record against us doesn't include monster scores. In 8 games he has only two 120+ games. Geelong is playing the Bombers, going back onto Danger should be a safe bet.
Fair point but I'm not sure if the Cats can afford that with the Crows breathing down their neck for top four. Need that percentage.Bit wary about Danger. When geelong played the bombers back in rd 4 no cats got to the ton. This was because Scott had the players (especially the mids) spend large amounts of time on the bench, to give them sort of a half-rest. I think their highest scorer was Selwood with 97. With finals coming up I'd expect this to happen again. However, they only won that game by about 30 points, and considering they would be desperate for percentage, they may just go all out this time. Merrett had 127 in that game. I might go him again.
Bit wary about Danger. When geelong played the bombers back in rd 4 no cats got to the ton. This was because Scott had the players (especially the mids) spend large amounts of time on the bench, to give them sort of a half-rest. I think their highest scorer was Selwood with 97. With finals coming up I'd expect this to happen again. However, they only won that game by about 30 points, and considering they would be desperate for percentage, they may just go all out this time. Merrett had 127 in that game. I might go him again.
Bit wary about Danger. When geelong played the bombers back in rd 4 no cats got to the ton. This was because Scott had the players (especially the mids) spend large amounts of time on the bench, to give them sort of a half-rest. I think their highest scorer was Selwood with 97. With finals coming up I'd expect this to happen again. However, they only won that game by about 30 points, and considering they would be desperate for percentage, they may just go all out this time. Merrett had 127 in that game. I might go him again.