iAsbestos
All Australian
- Nov 22, 2019
- 609
- 1,092
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Dunkley oooofWe're getting Shai Bolton?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dunkley oooofWe're getting Shai Bolton?
The club would be crazy not to consider Ronny FRJ (Ronny Fejo Jnr) with a later pick or if we trade upwards.
Moves like a more flashy, agile and better kicking version of SPS.
Has benefitted from SANFL experience and game time this year also.
If you're going to trade out a pick, it's pick 6. And if you're going to trade in a pick, it's pick 40.The occasional hit but lots of misses there.
What is it about pick 6 ?If you're going to trade out a pick, it's pick 6. And if you're going to trade in a pick, it's pick 40.
AFL Draft Picks Broken Down by Pick Number - Draftguru
www.draftguru.com.au
A second pick in the 60's this year might be more speculative than leaving room for a mid-season pick next year.Minor phrasing error/mislead.
We have no reason to delist Cottrell just to re-select him in the rookie draft. If we do that, we could've just offered him a fourth year rookie deal and saved the hassle and risk. The rules literally changed this year to allow a fourth year rookie deal without the need to delist and re-draft, yet we are delisting and re-drafting...
It's because he needs to be of the list come lodgement day end of November.
Some time between Dec 1 and mid-March when the SSP closes. Doc will go onto the inactive list and Cottrell will be his SSP rookie replacement.
A decision on Doc's season wouldn't be too outlandish considering the significant health journey he is on and its effects on the human body, particularly in a high performance environment.
Further, it would be an absolute joke if we only took 1 kid in this draft pool. You need a consistent stream of youth coming in on a yearly basis - which is why the 3 picks in the ND was mandated in the first place.
2 ND picks and Akuei as Cat B, should be the absolute minimum for fresh blood in the team.
Yes...
But, the club has publicly stated O’Brien and Cottrell will be picked up via the rookie draft
Minor phrasing error/mislead.
We have no reason to delist Cottrell just to re-select him in the rookie draft. If we do that, we could've just offered him a fourth year rookie deal and saved the hassle and risk. The rules literally changed this year to allow a fourth year rookie deal without the need to delist and re-draft, yet we are delisting and re-drafting...
In a draft pool like 2021 when many of youngsters not had much footy in last two years, it going to be almost pure luck if you hit or miss I would think.The occasional hit but lots of misses there.
In Numerology the number 6 is the embodiment of the heart. It represents unconditional love and the ability to support, nurture, and heal. In the Bible 666 is the number of the beast. In statistics there can be outliers (data that deviates by a factor of more than 1.5, which pick 6 does compared to picks 5 and 7). However...What is it about pick 6 ?
When I look at draft history I personally only start from about mid 1990's like 1994 as it the time the under 19's system is gone and most of the concessions of West Coast, Crows and Bears are gone to leave the draft pool more open to all players in Australia to pick from. Dockers and Port the new clubs in mid 90's still had some concessions but not as crazy good as Eagles to begin with.If you don't include first 15 years of the draft (where perhaps not same attention to drafting), the last 25 years or so for pick 6 is pretty much to the norm...
This makes great sense to me.A second pick in the 60's this year might be more speculative than leaving room for a mid-season pick next year.
Should be noted there is also a de-listed free agency period before the National Draft. Which if did not upgrade both Kennedy and Honey it could mean you get a delisted free agent on primary list and leave one of those guys on rookie list. Probably why not heard them certain upgrades yet as club has to keep options open as need to see what spills out from other clubs as more get delisted.This makes great sense to me.
So... 1 pick in ND, upgrade Kennedy and Honey, LoB and Cotterill on Rookie list, see how things go with Doc etc, and if needed, mid-season draft.
Dunkley oooof
If you're going to trade out a pick, it's pick 6. And if you're going to trade in a pick, it's pick 40.
AFL Draft Picks Broken Down by Pick Number - Draftguru
www.draftguru.com.au
Yes and have a maximum list number allowed of 42 + 2x Cat B rookies
Currently we have
33 senior list
+ 6 already signed rookies
+ 2 committed to rookies (LOB & Cottrell)
= 41 listed players + 1x Cat B
Leaves us 1x Draft list spot and 1x Cat B rookies available
To get to the required number of
36x Senior list spots
6x Rookie list spots
2x Cat B spots
we will need to
Main Draft
1x Draft and 2x Rookie Upgrades (Kennedy & Honey?)
= 36x Senior list spots
Rookie Draft
Pick 6 - LOB
Pick 25 - Cottrell
= 6x Rookie list spots
1x Cat B
= 2x Cat B spots
AFL rules state (which were posted here a couple of days ago) any LTI spots that need to be filled can only be done, after the rookie draft..
In the Pre season or in MSD
Pick 199 got the Patriots Tom Brady. Surely the greatest and most ridiculous draft pick of all time.Pick #119 is where it's at.
Dean Kemp or a Prime Minister!!!
Certainly a possibility. Though, given we have already made commitments to LOB & Cotts, if we were planning to take two picks, you'd think we would have sought an exemption from the AFL already. And perhaps we have, just not announced it. Obviously a very sensitive matter, and Doc's welfare needs to be at the top of everyone's concerns.Whatever the AFL rules say, there is always exceptions and exemptions, with what’s happening with Doc, we may be planning on asking the AFL for some leeway.
Yes and have a maximum list number allowed of 42 + 2x Cat B rookies
Currently we have
33 senior list
+ 6 already signed rookies
+ 2 committed to rookies (LOB & Cottrell)
= 41 listed players + 1x Cat B
Leaves us 1x Draft list spot and 1x Cat B rookies available
To get to the required number of
36x Senior list spots
6x Rookie list spots
2x Cat B spots
we will need to
Main Draft
1x Draft and 2x Rookie Upgrades (Kennedy & Honey?)
= 36x Senior list spots
Rookie Draft
Pick 6 - LOB
Pick 25 - Cottrell
= 6x Rookie list spots
1x Cat B
= 2x Cat B spots
AFL rules state (which were posted here a couple of days ago) any LTI spots that need to be filled can only be done, after the rookie draft..
In the Pre season or in MSD
Might be only minor but our pick 64 will go out a couple for father sons but will come in by up to 10 picks when Collingwood and bulldogs give up later picks to make up the points when Daicos and Darcy get bidded on. 64 might end up being 56.This makes great sense to me.
So... 1 pick in ND, upgrade Kennedy and Honey, LoB and Cotterill on Rookie list, see how things go with Doc etc, and if needed, mid-season draft.
The club would be crazy not to consider Ronny FRJ (Ronny Fejo Jnr) with a later pick or if we trade upwards.
Moves like a more flashy, agile and better kicking version of SPS.
Has benefitted from SANFL experience and game time this year also.
We have 33 on the senior list now and must start next season with a minimum of 36.
2 x ND picks + 1 rookie elevation = 36 on the senior list
We have 6 on the Cat A rookie list currently. 5 when you take into account the elevation mentioned above. This gives us one pick, which will be LOB given we have committed to taking him.
This gives us a 36/6/1 split, and the required 42 on the senior + Cat A rookie list.
There is no reason for us to have delisted Cottrell unless we already know we are moving someone to the LTI/Inactive list. My guess is this will be Doc, and will allow us to take a rookie via the SSP period. This will be Cottrell.
End result:
Senior list: 36 (+1 inactive)
Cat A Rookie list: 7 (6 + 1 SSP)
Cat B Rookie list: 1
Slight edit to this.
From the Nick Austin interview posted on the CFC website, sounds like we're pretty happy to take just the one pick into this national draft. So that may mean 1 x ND and 2 x upgrades.
Not expecting much from us re: trading picks either, sounds like we're very content picking where we are and more importantly very keen to attack next year's draft.
Pick 56 is not a bad pick to have. If we are not using it, maybe we can trade it for a F2...Might be only minor but our pick 64 will go out a couple for father sons but will come in by up to 10 picks when Collingwood and bulldogs give up later picks to make up the points when Daicos and Darcy get bidded on. 64 might end up being 56.