Read that ready to let fly but he didn't call our leadership group overrated or rubbish, he called large leadership groups in general that.
Still one thing he did get wrong IMO:
“Lachie Plowman also got the vote. No doubt a very exciting prospect with a bright future and leadership potential, but the facts will tell you he boasts a 28 percent winning record at AFL level and is yet to experience a final. Hardly leadership material for a proud club like Carlton."
How the hell is Lachie's winning percentage or finals experience relevant? He just got through talking about the size of our group and then wonders how much leadership the #7 or 8 guy is going to provide.
How many of our players have a great winning %?
Should we put Daisy in there or Lang because he came from a winning side? It's just shortsighted bullshit.