Remove this Banner Ad

Hot Topic CARLTON SUPPORTERS ONLY - Carlton fires Captain Carlton

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.


This thread is for the discussion of the sacking of a club mascot after refusing to participate in a bar mitzvah which was allegedly sending money back to the IDF.

By taking this position and labelling the act racist, the club has taken a position on the Israel-Palestine conflict.

This thread concerns a discussion of the following:
  • whether it is acceptable for the club to fire someone for taking a political stance.
  • whether it is a good idea for the club to have taken a public position on this issue.

This thread is not a thread in which you should partake in expressing your political beliefs concerning the conflict, nor is it somewhere in which forum rules do not apply.

Should you seek to participate in conversation related to the war, you can do so here:

There's also a thread on the SRP for a more robust discussion than can be permitted here:


If you wish to participate in this thread, do so knowing that this will not be allowed to escalate beyond a point.

Thanks all!
 
Last edited:
Not sure where the lines are at.

My opinion.

Assuming he was there as a paid employee of the Blues, he needs to act professionally. However, he is entitled to his personal beliefs, which in this case clearly are strong. Not sure how much prior knowledge he has had of the gig.

Walking out for mine should not bring censure if he was unaware of details going in. Unfortunately, if he made the comment that has been attributed, he did cross a line. I can understand his disdain over the inadvertent support he was giving assuming it conflicted with a strong belief.

Again, I fully support his right to withdraw labour without censure, but in this day and age which is fraught with so much pressure to conform, he should have kept his mouth shut, particularly with throwaway terminology that is clearly racist in nature.

If the event was a pseudo fundraiser for a foreign military rather than simply a young supporter’s coming of age, that begs so very many more questions of ethics and legality.
 
This is a very difficult position for Carlton to take regardless of the stated comment made. Noting the International Court of Justice position and many countries expressed outrage against Israels actions, and here we have an event raising money for the Israel Defence Forces (or at least their soldiers).

Depending on the mascots terms and conditions of employment (and what he actually said - ffs why didn't he just walk out quietly!) he may have good cause to argue unfair dismissal in the courts. And hard to see Carlton doing well in the court of public opinion.

Very sad to see politics intruding on sport. While we often like to take the "you know what" out of opposition clubs I hope this gets resolved without too much fallout.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Employees a dickhead for swearing and making a scene at a kids event.

Club will likely have to give him a payout to avoid unfair dismissal claims.

If the club knew what the event was raising money for, then shame on them - it's not antisemetic to be opposed to raising money for a foreign military.
 
If the event was a pseudo fundraiser for a foreign military rather than simply a young supporter’s coming of age, that begs so very many more questions of ethics and legality.
Sensible take I think.

But the club's in a hard place on it, and they want to go with the prevailing political (suck up to the people in control of the purse strings) winds and make a choice.

Shot choice they made, though. Just withdraw membership in protest.
 
I can’t believe what I have just read. Surely there is compassion for both sides in this war. There is no room for extreme political or racial views in sport. While this wasn’t a sporting event he was representing our football club.
They had him along to raise money for a genocide.

He made his choice - respect.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Club hasn't chosen a side at all. Man was employed to do a job. Handled walking out poorly and made a scene. End of.

Affiliations and purpose are secondary to the above for an employer employee relationship
Replace "detention guards at a Chinese concentration camp" for "IDF soldiers". Where is the line before it's fair to withdraw your labour?
 
Small clarification, it wasn't a fundraiser for a foreign military.

It was a kid's (big) birthday party, where the kid/family decided to donate money from presents to wounded Israeli soldiers.

Sure, maybe the same underlying thing at the end of the day. But there is a little nuance in the situation.
 
Replace "detention guards at a Chinese concentration camp" for "IDF soldiers". Where is the line before it's fair to withdraw your labour?

What if the funds were being donated to the Chinese Communist Party and Captain Carlton said 'f*****g commies' before walking out?

Same/different/better/worse?
 
What if the funds were being donated to the Chinese Communist Party and Captain Carlton said 'f*****g commies' before walking out?

Same/different/better/worse?
Has the persecution of the Uyghur people been deemed a genocide by the ICC?

It seems to me that the employee has a defensible position given the primacy of Oz’s adherence to UN conventions
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

What if the funds were being donated to the Chinese Communist Party and Captain Carlton said 'f*****g commies' before walking out?

Same/different/better/worse?
I wouldn't do some fund raiser for something like that.

Online gambling is where it's at.
 
This is a complex situation, involving many aspects. I'd like to know if the person who was paid to perform as Captain Carlton knew he was going to an event associated with a Jewish religious festival? If so, there would have been certain expectations in terms of how one behaved and spoke. At the same time, I can get why he'd be upset when discovering the fund-raising activity. IMO, I think the club has dropped the ball in both speaking of expectations (no swearing at a kid's event), and ensuring an employee was not put in a situation that went against their conscience.
 
Has the persecution of the Uyghur people been deemed a genocide by the ICC?

It seems to me that the employee has a defensible position given the primacy of Oz’s adherence to UN conventions

No, it hasn't.

Although it should be.
 
The Herald Sun headline on the front page is shameful and adds nothing to a nuanced discussion.

The Herald Sun went for inflammatory over nuance? Say it aint so... :p
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hot Topic CARLTON SUPPORTERS ONLY - Carlton fires Captain Carlton

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top