No, he’s looking very shaky, and difficult to see him coaching next seasonYou think Voss looks real safe atm?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
No, he’s looking very shaky, and difficult to see him coaching next seasonYou think Voss looks real safe atm?
What did you expect?Very disappointing tonight.
Hard for Vossy to coach a team of shit footballers. Can't polish turds and there's atleast 30 of them on the list.What did you expect?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You’d honestly expect a fair bit more. I genuinely thought Carlton would be a bit better.What did you expect?
70% of the List is woefulIt’s hard to believe Carlton’s talent is that average. I am lost on them. Either the list or the coaching.
There's quite a few that have talent but are just content to coast every week and collect an inflated pay check.Hard for Vossy to coach a team of shit footballers. Can't polish turds and there's atleast 30 of them on the list.
They give 85%There's quite a few that have talent but are just content to coast every week and collect an inflated pay check.
Vossy reckons footy is 25% natural ability and 85% hard work.They give 85%
Vossy may not be the next Albert Einstein... But I can tell ya this much, the tackling efforts tonight is entirely about a lack of hard workVossy reckons footy is 25% natural ability and 85% hard work.
He has the right idea. He just cant get the players on board. If he cant do that then he's not senior coach material.If there’s one bloke you’d want to have a look at for inspiration on how to play it’s Voss. These players these days are more interested in their socials and next trip to America in the off season to watch NFL.
We’re never in it at 0-4They've generally been pretty good when I've seen them, early days.
Lol what? He will be going to a team offering 600K+ more per year. Let's not pretend this has anything to do with Carlton fans.lol Carlton fans turning on De Koning as they know he's about to leave them.
They did this when he was unable to keep his spot in the team a few years back. You can see why he's happy to accept a change of scenery.
The problem is they do everything half assed.They have always struck me as one of the least agile clubs, like they are still stuck in the John Elliott ways of buying the best players and 'We're Carlton, **** the rest'.
Sydney made B2B GFs without Buddy, winning one, then two GFs in three years with Buddy, winning none. Hawthorn made B2B GFs with Buddy, winning one, then B2B GFs without Buddy, winning both. Arguably the best player this century (top 5 anyway) moving between two of the contending clubs didn't really change the fortunes of either. That's how hard it is to win flags. Carlton give me vibes that they think if they can swap Harry McKay for another mid they will win the flag.
I don’t think it’s coasting to be honest.There's quite a few that have talent but are just content to coast every week and collect an inflated pay check.
The problem is they do everything half assed.
I just compare them to teams who successfully got off the bottom like the Tigers under Hardwick or Lions under Fagan and cringe.
Drafting wise we hit big in 2015, but then whiffed on a number of key picks. Not a great deal of late round success either. That has meant we’re short of players in key areas and had to waste valuable draft capital to secure missing talent.
Those trades for Cerra etc haven’t been nearly as successful as one would hope.
Instead of seemingly having a well run ship with everyone on the same page the club just appears to have continual problems that they try to fix with band aid solutions.
Nothing about the coaches they select seems like it’s ever off the back of well run and comprehensive process.
There has never seemed to be a recruiting strategy that aligns with coaching and forward thinking.
Everyone mentions how the stand rule made the contested footy brand outdated and hard to win with. I do agree somewhat however Richmond was showing back to 2017 that winning games mucking up things with pressure and speed was a viable premiership strategy. Craig McRae was at Richmond and I don’t think his gameplan is drastically different from what a lot of what Richmond was doing then.
I was vehemently against Voss when he was hired. He was no good at the Lions and at Port okay there were decent reviews about people skills etc and maybe his work with Ollie Wines but that club wasn’t winning anything. Yes he wasn’t the head coach but I don’t think he’s much different from Hinkley.
Plus to me it was like they got told no by Clarkson, messed around with Lyon and then just thought oh well Vossy’s a a good guy. There was no proper process.
Both the Tigers and Lions had a strategy and a coach there for a long time to implement what they wanted. Carlton meanwhile chopped and changed coaches and now seemingly decided on a coach with an outdated idea about footy.
I’m sure part of it is how much money we’ve wasted on McGovern etc but compared to say the Lions we simply have ignored key problems with the list. Look at the Lions recruitment since 2016 and you’ll see they consistently filled holes. We did a couple of times but most of our pick ups have been overpaid players who cost too much draft capital like Cerra, McGovern, Saad etc
Now we’ve got Graham Wright who is meant to come in and blow the joint apart and maybe fix things. Consider me quite pessimistic about that considering Carlton’s idea about how to win flags or at least be consistently up the ladder again involves getting in the big name fitness coaches, coaches, CEOs, footy managers, big name player etc.
I think with how he has played at the Eagles it should be abundantly clear why we were very happy to move him on. 28 years old so very limited scope for improvement. Defensive pressure is poor, positional awareness is poor, slow and no positional versatility either. His one strength was set shot kicking accuracy but outside of that he was not making us better.Also don't get why they gave away Owies (or why we wanted him). For a guy that isn't a high priced recruit it seemed weird to not want a guy that kicked 30 goals and can play inside 50 without needing to be a regular target.
I think with how he has played at the Eagles it should be abundantly clear why we were very happy to move him on. 28 years old so very limited scope for improvement. Defensive pressure is poor, positional awareness is poor, slow and no positional versatility either. His one strength was set shot kicking accuracy but outside of that he was not making us better.
He essentially averaged 1 goal a game last season against non bottom 4 opposition and provided nothing else.
We have a lot of small forwards on the list so quantity is not really the issue - it is more quality. Williams has been a small forward with some stints in the midfield and Motlop similar. We would have hoped for more from the others but we have been pretty putrid so haven't really seen the best of anyone. Regardless, we had to go past Owies and I'd still rather put the faith in a 21 year old like Motlop or 23 year old in Durdin improving than an Owies who I don't see getting much better.I agree but I thought he was OK to start the year. Hot garbage since he got injured. None of our forwards get much opportunity or good service so he is on a hiding to nothing. IMO Carlton got rid of him without really replacing the role, hence with McKay mostly injured your second highest goal kicker is Zac Williams. Motlop is OK but goes missing a lot.
In regards to the Hawks game the club is in self preservation mode.Voss seems like a good dude that the players get behind but watching the game on Thursday I was scratching my head at how poor the forward entries were and how easy they seemed to make the game for Hawthorn. They have a couple of skilful players in defence and on the wing but turnovers in the corridor and from shallow entries just make their lives easy.
Every team has strengths and weaknesses in personnel but Carlton don't really seem to make great use of what they have. My team has no experienced key position players left. Yesterday's defence was Ginbey (20, not really a tall, 58 games woo), Brock (22, 10 games, probably not AFL standard), Bazzo (21, 23 games, barely played in two years) and at the other end was Archer Reid (19, 11 games) and Jobe Shanahan (18, 4 games). On paper that team should be terrified of Carlton's spine but I don't fear playing Carlton that the talls will do what Curnow did to us a couple of years ago. And that is with a clearly much stronger midfield. Which is weird but the connection between the lines just isn't there. Also don't get why they gave away Owies (or why we wanted him). For a guy that isn't a high priced recruit it seemed weird to not want a guy that kicked 30 goals and can play inside 50 without needing to be a regular target.