Too early to judge Jack yet, just remember SOS played in a good team just about his whole career. Down the track when we are a good side we'll see how he goes. me i think he will be a very good footballer, his old man was a superstar though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hear this argument a lot but at a good side noway does SOJ have near 50 games to his name. I think he would be lucky to have 5.Too early to judge Jack yet, just remember SOS played in a good team just about his whole career. Down the track when we are a good side we'll see how he goes. me i think he will be a very good footballer, his old man was a superstar though.
Yep i can agree with that to a degree, but when our midfield start getting the ball more often smart players will lead to the right position. I think Jack is a smart player.I hear this argument a lot but at a good side noway does SOJ have near 50 games to his name. I think he would be lucky to have 5.
He was a late pick and is clearly a limited player so if he makes it than that just a bonus. No doubt his name has helped him along the way but it also carries huge unfair pressure on the kid.
For me he's in the Polson, Garlett and now Pickett group where it should just be seen as a bonus if they come on rather than expectation.
Post of the year - IMHO it is completely understandable that GC would pay significant overs to get a 10 year Captain.
There are many reasons GC are in the situation they are - lack of leadership is one of the main ones.
Yep i can agree with that to a degree, but when our midfield start getting the ball more often smart players will lead to the right position. I think Jack is a smart player.
Agree. Most of our side will look better in a better sideYep i can agree with that to a degree, but when our midfield start getting the ball more often smart players will lead to the right position. I think Jack is a smart player.
I think it’s players like Garlett Jack and Cuners and others, for whatever reasons, that need to get better. After 3 years in the system they need to start showing something like the Fishers, Curnows.I'm hoping that with a better and fitter list players like Jack Cuningham Garlett get to settle in one role.
Best 27?This, exactly this..........and you'd think if you were Craig Cameron, Stuart Dew, etc, that you'd be selling that fact for all you're worth. I go up there every year for our game up there. It's a must do.
Just like every other club, we will always incur injuries. You need to plan to have enough genuine depth so that you can cover up to 20% of your list being unavailable at any given time. You need a best 32 rather than a best 22 if that makes sense.
I agree with your first 3, surely Simmo will be cooked by then but maybe not. Daisy has to go after next year but will be good for one more year of on field coaching. Levi is just depth for injuries in KPF but could have gone this year so he’s definitely gone next year.
As for the rest, I think most will stay as they are up to it. Garlett and Pickett are the type of players that will thrive in a better team which I think we are likely to be 10-14th next year.
Those new rules can make a real impact...basically, you can negotiate with these players and pretty much have them signed up prior to the draft without the risk of someone else swooping on them. You can have part of your list stitched up before the draft kicks off, which could then take the pressure off who we take in the lower picks.If we wish to take Sam Fisher &/or Jesse Palmer then no risk in missing out if they’re up for rookie listing unless they wish to go to the draft.
http://m.afl.com.au/news/2018-11-18/analysis-how-the-new-rookie-rule-will-change-football
Those new rules can make a real impact...basically, you can negotiate with these players and pretty much have them signed up prior to the draft without the risk of someone else swooping on them. You can have part of your list stitched up before the draft kicks off, which could then take the pressure off who we take in the lower picks.
Just have a feeling our 2nd pick won't be 69.Yep, can certainly settle your mature rookie spots but also pushes up the youngsters to replace them on draft night if other clubs have agreed to the same.
I.e. where clubs would have been taking the mature guys late, we could miss out on a desired draftee where other clubs have room on their list, especially this year where we’re kicking back in from #69.
I have been having that very thought todayJust have a feeling our 2nd pick won't be 69.
Just have a feeling our 2nd pick won't be 69.
Reckon RP meant the latter
Just have a feeling our 2nd pick won't be 69.
Sounds like my Deep Calm.Yeah he did. And anytime he had to take a class as an emergency teacher he'd roll out the tv/VCR combo put this on. I reckon I saw this film 15 times through high school
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
Good lord man, your about twelve totally irrelevant topics behindSounds like my Deep Calm.
I've probably watched Rivers Edge 15 times as well....but by choice....mostly in a dimly lit smoked up loungeroom circa '95
Agree with all of that except Plowman, and fingers crossed for FasoloI can easily make a case for 12
Start the ball rolling with some retirements
Simmo, Daisy, Levi
Others injury prone/shown very little
Phillips, Pickett, Garlett, Lang, Lebois
Players under pressure
Cuners, Fasolo, Jones, Plowman
You could name a couple of others to this category
Yeah weekends ya know. Nice to catch up on the Lukosius discussion though.Good lord man, your about twelve totally irrelevant topics behind
ps please don't shoot me
AceAndy begs to differ, it was something to do with shivering cold summers in a tepid climate he has been known to suffer freezing,s**t fever.as solid an 8th post as there has ever been........