Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Fisher burrowed in to. Smith and Fisher are more alike than Fisher and Walsh. Also, the underlined statement you've made (in error) is exactly what I'm saying."he escaped from nothing and nowhere to distribute the football. Relied on blocks from team mates to escape any contest, and was just the guy smartly making a small amount of space for himself to receive through timing of runs (and occasionally release a team mate, but certainly not at a stoppage)."
This is total rubbish. Won the ball consistently with much help. Worked hard to take the ball off others. Maybe he is just a better Zac Fisher.
That will do me.
PlentyFisher burrowed in to. Smith and Fisher are more alike than Fisher and Walsh. Also, the underlined statement you've made (in error) is exactly what I'm saying.
Watch him again in the game everyone was raving about, and tell me how many times he won his own footy in a contest and disposed of it:
Follow-up question: how many times did he wind up getting rid of the footy when tackled?
Another follow-up question: how many times did he pressure the player in possession?
No, they're not.They are highlights of his possessions not his pressure acts.
Unpopular opinion.
I do not want lukosious. He screams jack watts 2.0 with a potential go home factor.
Give me Walsh or Smith.
Imagine a midfield of TDK, Cripps, Smith/Walsh, Dow, Kennedy, SPS and Fish.. not a bad starting point at all. Serious talent.
Fisher burrowed in to. Smith and Fisher are more alike than Fisher and Walsh. Also, the underlined statement you've made (in error) is exactly what I'm saying.
Watch him again in the game everyone was raving about, and tell me how many times he won his own footy in a contest and disposed of it:
Follow-up question: how many times did he wind up getting rid of the footy when tackled?
Another follow-up question: how many times did he pressure the player in possession?
Fisher burrowed in to. Smith and Fisher are more alike than Fisher and Walsh. Also, the underlined statement you've made (in error) is exactly what I'm saying.
Watch him again in the game everyone was raving about, and tell me how many times he won his own footy in a contest and disposed of it:
Follow-up question: how many times did he wind up getting rid of the footy when tackled?
Another follow-up question: how many times did he pressure the player in possession?
and I still have high hopes for Cuningham & O'Brien and Pickett as a wingman Charlie I still believe will play a lot of midfield minutes and be something very special, then maybe we add Brodie and then Kelly in 2019
I do not think he will now. Think the centre half forward role has been found the best use of his talents. He may do short stints like a Roughy or Hogan but the early questions of whether he would be a mid or forward are over now. He is just too good as a key forward to take away from there. Next season when sides cannot start a loose man in defence after every goal will just advantage players like him more.
Serious?There's definitely a palpable difference between this years top 5-10 and last years. As optimistic as it is as this stage, Lukosius, Rankine, Walsh and Smith look like surefire future stars - contrast that with Rayner, Brayshaw, Dow, LDU and Cerra who looked like good future players, but all had a few question marks - Cerra probably the least of that batch. Rayner was the most obvious future gun, but I doubt he goes Top 5 in this draft. Brayshaw would be lucky to scrape into the top 10-15.
Feel certain Adelaide will come hard for pick 1 (Lukosius) but cant see Silvagni wanting to drop out of the top 5 or 6.
How do Adelaide manage it ?
EFAHim and Harry are going to have a license to roam
They may going to have to let a player go. McGovern?
They also have two first rounders at around 8 & 12. That alone won't get it done but if McGovern wanted to come to us, we can surely work something out to get us back into the top half dozen picks.
Right now the standout quality in the draft sits at around the top 7; Walsh, Smith, BKing, MKing, Rankine, Lukosius and for me Blakey.
Unfortunately though, that top 7 (subjective, I know) is really a top 6 for the obvious reason.
If GC want Lukosius, we may be well best served to deal with them and then with Adelaide for Rankine.
We could do really well should serious interest for those players comes from those clubs.
Still keen on RCD, but he'd want to show some ball-winning ability over the next few weeks.
Could Stocker do a Clayton Oliver this year? Could someone else?
GC armed with picks 2&3 would be great to deal with but i can see them going bang bang on the King brothers as a) replacement bookends for Lynch and May and b) they might even decide to stay on the coast to play out their careers togeather.
Just cant see Adelaide letting Lukosius play in any other colors.
Yes they have 2 1st round picks but not of the calibre Silvagni likes to fire and even with McGovern thrown into the mix , it still leaves us short of the pointy end of the draft so struggling to see how it happens without major input from other parties ...
Feel certain Adelaide will come hard for pick 1 (Lukosius) but cant see Silvagni wanting to drop out of the top 5 or 6.
How do Adelaide manage it ?
Serious?
I liked last years top 5 way more.
I am iffy on projections for this years crop
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Thank you. In a 30+ possession game, do you think those stats are impressive, especially once you grade the quality of the disposal when someone gets hold of him?Question 1: 9 (6 hard ball gets)
Question 2: 4 out of 6 instances of being tackled with the ball (1 free kick for high technically makes 5)
Question 3: 2
What's funny is that you're equating him to Josh Kelly, given Kelly was a far better athlete. He's much closer to Scully.That's funny.
Walsh works very hard and finds himself never far away from a possession, whether it be in the centre, forward or back.
May not be a head first mid, but he doesn't need to be as his work with the ball and bringing team-mates into the game, more than makes up for this 'failing' as is the case for JoshKelly.....and anyone rubbishing Kelly for not being grunt can only be made to look silly.
Walsh just doesn't stop moving and given the way the game may be going to open up, his value will be at a premium.