Remove this Banner Ad

Carlton's Recruiting

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Boys dont keep feeing this w**nker, he is a pies supporter remeber they are always right and always talking a whole lot of s**t.

For the record lets take a look at a few of the pies selections since 2001....

2001
11Richard Cole
27Tom DavidsonCollingwood
43Mark McGoughCollingwood
72Tristen WalkerCollingwood
Gee 2001 saw 4 top line draft picks go collingwoods ay


2002
21CollingwoodBOWMAN NIXON
29CollingwoodLUKE SHACKLETON
43CollingwoodCAMERON CLOKE

Hmmm 3 quality players there

2003
17CollingwoodWILLIAM MORRISON
32CollingwoodBRAYDEN SHAW35CollingwoodBRENT HALLCollingwoodJULIAN ROWE
Another good yar of recruits

2004
10110513CollingwoodChristopher Egan
23110416CollingwoodSean Rusling55100478CollingwoodAdam Iacobucci
Household superstars?

2005
21CollingwoodDanny Stanley
37CollingwoodJohn Anthony

Pretty impressive list of recruits for the last few years buddy, yeah we have drafted some dudds along the way as well, back check your own backyard out first brother, not flash mate.

Kennedy will destroy the woods in a couple of years time, big fellas take a few years to come on. Once Buclkey and co are gone your in for some torrid years ya to**sr
 
Absolutely. Go ahead.
Okay then.
Your top five would be Gibbs, Murphy, Kennedy, Walker and I'm not sure of the next one (it cannot include Waite or Fisher though, they are not kids any more)

Our top five would be Thomas, Pendlebury, T Cloke, Reid and Brown.

Now. I'll admit Gibbs and Murphy are standouts, and could be said to be better than any of that five.
However, after that, all our younger players are better than yours.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Boys dont keep feeing this w**nker, he is a pies supporter remeber they are always right and always talking a whole lot of s**t.

For the record lets take a look at a few of the pies selections since 2001....

2001
11Richard Cole
27Tom DavidsonCollingwood
43Mark McGoughCollingwood
72Tristen WalkerCollingwood
Gee 2001 saw 4 top line draft picks go collingwoods ay


2002
21CollingwoodBOWMAN NIXON
29CollingwoodLUKE SHACKLETON
43CollingwoodCAMERON CLOKE

Hmmm 3 quality players there

2003
17CollingwoodWILLIAM MORRISON
32CollingwoodBRAYDEN SHAW35CollingwoodBRENT HALLCollingwoodJULIAN ROWE
Another good yar of recruits

2004
10110513CollingwoodChristopher Egan
23110416CollingwoodSean Rusling55100478CollingwoodAdam Iacobucci
Household superstars?

2005
21CollingwoodDanny Stanley
37CollingwoodJohn Anthony

Pretty impressive list of recruits for the last few years buddy, yeah we have drafted some dudds along the way as well, back check your own backyard out first brother, not flash mate.

Kennedy will destroy the woods in a couple of years time, big fellas take a few years to come on. Once Buclkey and co are gone your in for some torrid years ya to**sr
If you read my posts, I said our 01, 02 and 03 drafting was poor.
Since then, it has been good.
 
Thomas > Walker
Egan > Betts
Pendlebury > Simpson
T Cloke > Kennedy
H Shaw > Blackwell
O'Brien > Bower

Waite and Fisher are no longer kids.
If you go on that presumption,
Didak > FIsher
Fraser > Waite

Hang on, where did Murphy and Gibbs go? We're comparing players who play in similar positions. Walker plays on the backline we as Thomas plays with his hair. Pendlebury couldn't tie up Simpson's boots let alone be mentioned in the same breath as him. Here's one for you Bushie.

Fevola >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TicTac and Fraser
 
Thomas > Walker
Egan > Betts
Pendlebury > Simpson
T Cloke > Kennedy
H Shaw > Blackwell
O'Brien > Bower

Waite and Fisher are no longer kids.
If you go on that presumption,
Didak > FIsher
Fraser > Waite
Ha ha ha...that was a good one....what's next? A thread on How to nail diarrhea to a wall?!?!
 
Okay then.
Your top five would be Gibbs, Murphy, Kennedy, Walker and I'm not sure of the next one (it cannot include Waite or Fisher though, they are not kids any more)

Our top five would be Thomas, Pendlebury, T Cloke, Reid and Brown.

Now. I'll admit Gibbs and Murphy are standouts, and could be said to be better than any of that five.
However, after that, all our younger players are better than yours.

Our 5 best are: Simpson, Walker, Murphy, Gibbs and Kennedy.

Yours are Thomas, Pendelbury, Cloke, Reid and Brown.

Let's compare, keeping as much to like types as possible.

Walker>Reid
Murphy>Thomas
Kennedy>Cloke
Simpson>Pendelbury
Gibbs>Brown

So, the results are pretty obvious. The 5 kids you nominated from Collingwood are far inferior to the Carlton 5. Bad luck.
 
Okay then.
Your top five would be Gibbs, Murphy, Kennedy, Walker and I'm not sure of the next one (it cannot include Waite or Fisher though, they are not kids any more)

Our top five would be Thomas, Pendlebury, T Cloke, Reid and Brown.

Now. I'll admit Gibbs and Murphy are standouts, and could be said to be better than any of that five.
However, after that, all our younger players are better than yours.
Gibbs, Murphy, Kennedy, Walker WOW...... plus a 5th? hey, you could throw in my mum and that lot would still be better than your top 5 there.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

How did Brayden Shaw and Billy Morrison work out for you Bushie. They were your first 2 picks in 03 and then Heath Shaw at pick 3. Thought you couldn't go wrong with first round picks mate????
 
Thomas > Walker
Egan > Betts
Pendlebury > Simpson
T Cloke > Kennedy
H Shaw > Blackwell
O'Brien > Bower

Waite and Fisher are no longer kids.
If you go on that presumption,
Didak > FIsher
Fraser > Waite

You are a Class "A" **********head Bushie.

How can you say that Pendlebury is better than Simpson. Have you watched a game of football in the last 20 years.

Thomas is better than Walker you think. How about you stick Thomas in the backline instead of having running around the half-forward flank getting cheap possesions. With the new recuits this year, Walker can finally be released onto the wing. Then we will see who the better player is.

Our gun midfield for 2007: Murphy, Simpson, Gibbs, Walker, Scotland, Blackwell, and Stevens.

Your midfield: old farts who are have passed their used by date.
 
Our 5 best are: Simpson, Walker, Murphy, Gibbs and Kennedy.

Yours are Thomas, Pendelbury, Cloke, Reid and Brown.

Let's compare, keeping as much to like types as possible.

Walker>Reid
Murphy>Thomas
Kennedy>Cloke
Simpson>Pendelbury
Gibbs>Brown

So, the results are pretty obvious. The 5 kids you nominated from Collingwood are far inferior to the Carlton 5. Bad luck.
Like to likes, okay.
Walker is a midfielder, Reid is a tall.
Brown is a tall, Gibbs is a midfielder. Right, credibility=0 already.

To say Simpson is better than Pendlebury is absurd. Pendlebury is 19, Simpson is past the kid stage, and Simpson showed absolutely nothing in his first year, compared to Pendlebury, who showed enormous potential. So Pendlebury > Simpson easily.
Yes, I agree Murphy>Thomas, but not by much, Murphy will not develop much more, while Thomas has a lot more upside.
The list goes
Murphy> Thomas or Gibbs>Thomas yes.
Thomas> Walker Pendlebury > Walker. In fact, Walker is worse than all of those 5 players i nominated.
T Cloke > Kennedy on what each player has shown up to date.
N Brown > Kennedy, and Reid > Kennedy.
 
Like to likes, okay.
Walker is a midfielder, Reid is a tall.
Brown is a tall, Gibbs is a midfielder. Right, credibility=0 already.

To say Simpson is better than Pendlebury is absurd. Pendlebury is 19, Simpson is past the kid stage, and Simpson showed absolutely nothing in his first year, compared to Pendlebury, who showed enormous potential. So Pendlebury > Simpson easily.
Yes, I agree Murphy>Thomas, but not by much, Murphy will not develop much more, while Thomas has a lot more upside.
The list goes
Murphy> Thomas or Gibbs>Thomas yes.
Thomas> Walker Pendlebury > Walker. In fact, Walker is worse than all of those 5 players i nominated.
T Cloke > Kennedy on what each player has shown up to date.
N Brown > Kennedy, and Reid > Kennedy.

You clown. I am done feeding this troll.
 
It's interesting that you have a go at Jeremias for comparing Simpson to Pendlebury, yet you're prepared to do the same with Kennedy and Cloke

Your credibility is zero.

Of all Carlton players, to suggest Bower is unathletic is laughable and just goes further to highlight your inability to judge football talent.

Enjoy your time on this board while it lasts
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It's interesting that you have a go at Jeremias for comparing Simpson to Pendlebury, yet you're prepared to do the same with Kennedy and Cloke

Your credibility is zero.

Of all Carlton players, to suggest Bower is unathletic is laughable and just goes further to highlight your inability to judge football talent.

Enjoy your time on this board while it lasts
Kennedy and Cloke play the same position, so what's so bad about that?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom