This should be very humorous....Absolutely. Go ahead.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
This should be very humorous....Absolutely. Go ahead.
Okay then.Absolutely. Go ahead.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If you read my posts, I said our 01, 02 and 03 drafting was poor.Boys dont keep feeing this w**nker, he is a pies supporter remeber they are always right and always talking a whole lot of s**t.
For the record lets take a look at a few of the pies selections since 2001....
2001
11Richard Cole
27Tom DavidsonCollingwood
43Mark McGoughCollingwood
72Tristen WalkerCollingwood
Gee 2001 saw 4 top line draft picks go collingwoods ay
2002
21CollingwoodBOWMAN NIXON
29CollingwoodLUKE SHACKLETON
43CollingwoodCAMERON CLOKE
Hmmm 3 quality players there
2003
17CollingwoodWILLIAM MORRISON
32CollingwoodBRAYDEN SHAW35CollingwoodBRENT HALLCollingwoodJULIAN ROWE
Another good yar of recruits
2004
10110513CollingwoodChristopher Egan
23110416CollingwoodSean Rusling55100478CollingwoodAdam Iacobucci
Household superstars?
2005
21CollingwoodDanny Stanley
37CollingwoodJohn Anthony
Pretty impressive list of recruits for the last few years buddy, yeah we have drafted some dudds along the way as well, back check your own backyard out first brother, not flash mate.
Kennedy will destroy the woods in a couple of years time, big fellas take a few years to come on. Once Buclkey and co are gone your in for some torrid years ya to**sr
Thomas > Walker
Egan > Betts
Pendlebury > Simpson
T Cloke > Kennedy
H Shaw > Blackwell
O'Brien > Bower
Waite and Fisher are no longer kids.
If you go on that presumption,
Didak > FIsher
Fraser > Waite
Pushing the kids barrier. He was drafted in 02.Simpson would be our 5th player
Ha ha ha...that was a good one....what's next? A thread on How to nail diarrhea to a wall?!?!Thomas > Walker
Egan > Betts
Pendlebury > Simpson
T Cloke > Kennedy
H Shaw > Blackwell
O'Brien > Bower
Waite and Fisher are no longer kids.
If you go on that presumption,
Didak > FIsher
Fraser > Waite
Okay then.
Your top five would be Gibbs, Murphy, Kennedy, Walker and I'm not sure of the next one (it cannot include Waite or Fisher though, they are not kids any more)
Our top five would be Thomas, Pendlebury, T Cloke, Reid and Brown.
Now. I'll admit Gibbs and Murphy are standouts, and could be said to be better than any of that five.
However, after that, all our younger players are better than yours.
Pushing the kids barrier. He was drafted in 02.
Gibbs, Murphy, Kennedy, Walker WOW...... plus a 5th? hey, you could throw in my mum and that lot would still be better than your top 5 there.Okay then.
Your top five would be Gibbs, Murphy, Kennedy, Walker and I'm not sure of the next one (it cannot include Waite or Fisher though, they are not kids any more)
Our top five would be Thomas, Pendlebury, T Cloke, Reid and Brown.
Now. I'll admit Gibbs and Murphy are standouts, and could be said to be better than any of that five.
However, after that, all our younger players are better than yours.
Thomas > Walker
Egan > Betts
Pendlebury > Simpson
T Cloke > Kennedy
H Shaw > Blackwell
O'Brien > Bower
Waite and Fisher are no longer kids.
If you go on that presumption,
Didak > FIsher
Fraser > Waite
Like to likes, okay.Our 5 best are: Simpson, Walker, Murphy, Gibbs and Kennedy.
Yours are Thomas, Pendelbury, Cloke, Reid and Brown.
Let's compare, keeping as much to like types as possible.
Walker>Reid
Murphy>Thomas
Kennedy>Cloke
Simpson>Pendelbury
Gibbs>Brown
So, the results are pretty obvious. The 5 kids you nominated from Collingwood are far inferior to the Carlton 5. Bad luck.
Like to likes, okay.
Walker is a midfielder, Reid is a tall.
Brown is a tall, Gibbs is a midfielder. Right, credibility=0 already.
To say Simpson is better than Pendlebury is absurd. Pendlebury is 19, Simpson is past the kid stage, and Simpson showed absolutely nothing in his first year, compared to Pendlebury, who showed enormous potential. So Pendlebury > Simpson easily.
Yes, I agree Murphy>Thomas, but not by much, Murphy will not develop much more, while Thomas has a lot more upside.
The list goes
Murphy> Thomas or Gibbs>Thomas yes.
Thomas> Walker Pendlebury > Walker. In fact, Walker is worse than all of those 5 players i nominated.
T Cloke > Kennedy on what each player has shown up to date.
N Brown > Kennedy, and Reid > Kennedy.
Right here.Where are u Bushie??
Kennedy and Cloke play the same position, so what's so bad about that?It's interesting that you have a go at Jeremias for comparing Simpson to Pendlebury, yet you're prepared to do the same with Kennedy and Cloke
Your credibility is zero.
Of all Carlton players, to suggest Bower is unathletic is laughable and just goes further to highlight your inability to judge football talent.
Enjoy your time on this board while it lasts
Which was?You still havent answered my question