Oh, you want to keep at it do you?You can call it whatever you like, you've put in the time, you've earned the right.
You are right, I am wrong.Oh, you want to keep at it do you?
Well seeing that you do, i will call you out for what you are, see if you can prove me wrong.
You are a liar.
Now you said everyday for 10 years, see if you can find 5 posts in the last year, come on?
If not, i am right and your are nothing but a liar.
Lying to make a point?
David Glascott and his monkey are fair game however.You obviously haven’t reckoned with the low level of moral standards that permeate this site. The faceless keyboard warriors who belch bile and enjoy the sort of psychological degradation that befell James Hird or a career threatening injury to Charlie Curnow because it means Carlton suffer. They don’t even consider in the slightest the fact that embellishing sh*te rumours about women actually compounds the mysoginistic shadow that hovers over our great game.
This coming from a West COKE Eagles supporter lol. Team full of coke headsThe other is having these 'psuedo-journalists' who are essentially mouthpieces for their old clubs ala timmy the f-wit during the essendon team sanctioned and run doping scandal.
how disgraced drug cheat and incoherent son jobe got a gig as special comments guy on friday night football needs a royal commission.
They are famously made-up!This is just my opinion, and no more than that.
These rumours about the women journalists are a bit beneath us all... even on a rumours board.
It's just too easy to say "oh this woman had (fill in whatever gross sexual episode you imagine) and then imply that discredits them.
Plus, you almost never see it used in a way that allegedly totally discredits their male colleagues in the same way.
Just doesn't sit right with me. And as I say, that's just my opinion. You're all free to disagree. Just thought I'd say what I thought myself.