Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

System Upgrade - Search is back! - Post feedback.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
I'd say Caro would know a few of the manouverings, it's just whether they are official moves or just tentative moves to test the waters.so which in reality means we are not going to go after thompson
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That Collingwood havent ruled out looking at Mark Thompson as coach, on the offsiders this morning
every coach has a use by date, MM's must be fast approaching and given the rumours of his health over the last few years, it would be prudent of the admin to start looking at who would be a likely successor when MM leaves or is forced out of the job. Its called succession planning and every well run organisation does it.What's wrong with the coach you have now?.
Malthouse is just one factor in a series of factors why Collingwood are where they are at. Even he would say the same. The question should be, and it is one that Essendon have had to answer recently: When does the club make a judgement on an entrenched coaches tenure in terms of relevance in an ever changing game?Malthouse is the reason we are 5th at the moment. With any other coach I personally don't think we'd be in the 8 at all.
Even if we won the flag this year you Malthouse bashers would still find an excuse to hate him.
I'd say Caro would know a few of the manouverings, it's just whether they are official moves or just tentative moves to test the waters.
Collingwood would be looking beyond Malthouse and Malthouse cant be seriously considered to be there in 3 years. It doesnt hurt to forward plan your succession model.
Malthouse is an over-rated coach.

I think she meant Carlton - it was just a slip of the tongue.
Easy to happen when it has to navigate those braces.

I'd say Caro would know a few of the manouverings, it's just whether they are official moves or just tentative moves to test the waters.
Collingwood would be looking beyond Malthouse and Malthouse cant be seriously considered to be there in 3 years. It doesnt hurt to forward plan your succession model.
Because he hasnt done the one thing that is demanded these days of a Collingwood coach.why cant he be there in 3 years times if the team is winning?
That Collingwood havent ruled out looking at Mark Thompson as coach, on the offsiders this morning

The Age is full of alot of left wing ideas - most of which are not true. Always was been. Just a bunch of people thoughts - thats all it is don't worry about what they say too much![]()
Not sure how a club looking at a new coach is a left wing idea.
That Collingwood havent ruled out looking at Mark Thompson as coach, on the offsiders this morning
The way our board have been running it has been spot on. Continue extending his contract by 12 months at the begining of the year.I'd be happy to have Malthouse as coach for at least the next three years. He's been gutsy enough to debut these kids, he deserves the chance to let it play out.
May be an unpopular view but i think Mark Thompson is an over rated coach. I think he is just a perfect example of the difference between a coach an average and a good coach is The strength of the list at the time. Don't get me wrong danny frawley etc would not have been saved by brisbane in there strong years. But I mean 12 months ago Thompson was under pressure to keep his job after his side clearly under performed with pretty much the same list. The expectations for Geelong where there last year and so was the talent and he wasnt able to use it IMO the fact that he took 12 months to get the balance and the best out of the group is really not something that deserves so much praise his coaching is average his list is great.